Excerpt: ...). Pla intiffs allege that defendants know about the bedbug infestation in their room and failed to completely eradicate it. [Complaint, ¶¶90 -91] From this, the reckless disregard of the probability of emotional injury is alleged. [Complaint, ¶94] These alleg ations are sufficient to state two of the elements. However, defendants have not alleged “severe” emotional distress. “Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of substant...

Excerpt: ...lear.” Plaintiff resubmitted a copy of the declaration with a visible signature. (ROA 248 [Not. of Errata, Exh. B].) In light of the “corrected” declaration, Defendants' evidentiary objections are overruled. The Court may properly consider the Stelzer Declaration and exhi bits attached thereto. (Gall v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 117, 125.) Plaintiff moves, under Rules 8.278 and 3.1702, for an order fixing the amount of att...

Excerpt: ...elez [RO A # 1104], are sealed. Statement of Law “Unless confidentiality is required by law, court records are presumed to be open.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.550(c); In re Marriage of Tamir (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 1068, 1079.) “A record must not be filed under seal without a court order. The court must not permit a record to be filed under seal based solely on the agreement or stipulation of the parties.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2...

Excerpt: ...ode Ci v. Proc., § 418.10, subd. (a)(1).) The court may dismiss without prejudice the complaint in whole, or as to that defendant, when dismissal is made pursuant to Section 418.10. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581(h).) Here, Defendant, a Utah resident, asserts the cou rt lacks personal jurisdiction over him as it relates to Plaintiff's complaint. Defendant submits evidence showing he has been a resident of Utah since 2015, has a Utah driver's license, ...

Excerpt: ...ubstitutions of attorn eys have been filed such that Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Trela no longer represent any of Defendants, after previously representing all Defendants. The motion is made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 128.5 and 128.7(b). The motion and arguments in support of it are sparse, but it is clear the motion is based on the mistrial declared in this action on September 12, 2023, after Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Trela declared a con�...

Excerpt: ...ent infliction of emotional distress and one of the two defamatory statements alleged as the basis for the first cause of action for defamation (and the court of appeal affirmed that ruling). The governing analysis for a fee motion regarding a partially successfu l special motion to strike was described in Mann v. Quality Old Time Serv., Inc. (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 328, 344- 345: “An award of attorney fees to a partially prevailing defendant ...

Excerpt: ... of two terms: (1) six months after the person's death, or (2) the limitation period that would have been applicable had the person not died.” Parsons v. Tickner (1995) 31 Cal. App. 4th 1513, 1525; Code Civ. Proc., § 377.30. The two -year statute of limitations, CCP § 335.1, applies to statutory elder abuse and negligence claims. Defendant argues the statute of limitations has run, even with the application of Emergency Rule 9(a), which s...

Excerpt: ...action for breach of contrac t requires pleading of a contract, plaintiff's performance or excuse for failure to perform, defendant's breach, and damage to plaintiff resulting therefrom.” (Munoz v. MacMillan (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 648, 655.) “A written contract may be pleaded either b y its terms— set out verbatim in the complaint or a copy of the contract attached to the complaint and incorporated therein by reference— or by its lega...

Excerpt: ...moot as to paragraphs 56 and 86. It is denied as to paragraph 120 and granted with 15 days leave to amend as to paragraph 73. Demurrer A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear within the “four corners” of the pleading – which includes the pleadi ng, any exhibits attached, and matters of which the court is permitted to take judicial notice. Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal. 3d 311, 318; Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) ...

Excerpt: ...on, and application of the economic loss rule to the fourth, fifth, and sixth causes of action. The Court finds Defendants complied with their meet and confer obligations prior to filing the Demurrer. Statement of the Law “The party against whom a complaint or cros s-complaint has been filed may object, by demurrer or answer as provided in Section 430.30, to the pleading on any one or more of the following grounds: … (e) The pleading does...

Excerpt: ...IED. Code of Civil Procedu re section 437c(p)(1) provides that, “[f]or the purposes of motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication: (1) A plaintiff or crosscomplainant has met his or her burden of showing that there is no defense to a cause of action if that party has prov ed each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff or cross -complainant has met that burden, the bur...

Excerpt: ...d to the “fou r corners” of the pleading (which includes exhibits attached and incorporated therein) or from matters outside the pleading which are judicially noticeable under Evidence Code §§ 451 or 452. Although California courts take a liberal view of inartfully dra wn complaints, it remains essential that a complaint set forth the actionable facts relied upon with sufficient precision to inform the defendant of what plaintiff is complai...

Excerpt: ...cts that may be implied or inferred from those expressly alleged in the complaint. [Citations.]” (City of Atascadero v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 445, 459.) Code of Civil Procedure section 452, states, “In the construction of a p leading, for the purpose of determining its effect, its allegations must be liberally construed, with a view to substantial justice between the parties.” Perez v. Golden Empi...

Excerpt: ... 872, 889 [or dinarily no basis for judicial notice of content of government web sites].) As to Ex. B, judicial notice is limited to the fact that the declaration and exhibits were filed, but not of the truth of their contents. (Williams v. Wraxall (1995) 33 Cal.App.4 th 120, 130, FN 7.) Timeliness: defamatory statements. “Case law requires that statements alleged to constitute libel ‘must be The SAC now adequately alleges delayed discovery ...

Excerpt: ...�the court, in its discretion, may award to the prevailing party…reasonable attorney's fees and costs…except that…a prevailing defendant shall not be awarded fees and costs unless the court finds the action was frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless when brought, or the plaintiff continued to litigate after it clearly became so.” (Gov. Code, § 12965(c)(6); Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire Dist. (2015) 61 Cal.4th 97, 115.) �...

Excerpt: ...en of show ing that an essential element of the plaintiff's claim cannot be established by presenting evidence that the plaintiff “does not possess and cannot reasonably obtain, needed evidence.” (Lona v Citibank, N.A. (2011) 202 CA4th 89, 110.) Only after a defendant meets that burden, does the burden shift to the plaintiff to produce admissible evidence showing the existence of a triable issue as to a cause of action or complete defense...

Excerpt: ... her mental examination on 11/17/23 per the parties' agreement. But, this is not supported by the evidence included with the motion. In particular, the Court notes that the last email sent between the parties regarding the proposed 11/17/23 examination date was an email on 11/8/23 from Defense counsel to Plaintiff's counsel stating: “Dr. Lavid is available on Nov. 17th for the IME. Please confirm that date so we can get it on calendar.” (Fel...

Excerpt: ...posing the petit ion bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its defense. [Citation.] In these summary proceedings, the trial court sits as a trier of fact, weighing all the affidavits, declarations, and other documentary eviden ce, as well as oral testimony received at the court's discretion, to reach a final determination.'” (Lane v. Francis Capital Management LLC (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 676, 683.)...

Excerpt: ...ty se eking arbitration has the “burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by a preponderance of the evidence, while a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its def ense.” The trial court “sits as the trier of fact, weighing all the affidavits, declarations, and other documentary evidence, and any oral testimony the court may receive at its dis...

Excerpt: ...not apply to “ any case brought by an employee or applicant for employment against an employer for acts or omissions arising out of or relating to the employment relationship”], 2025.480 [authorizing motion to compel answers at deposition].) Plaintiff's evidentiary obje ction no. 3 to the Thomas Decl. is SUSTAINED [relevance]. Plaintiff's remaining evidentiary objections are OVERRULED. The motion is GRANTED as to a second session of plaintiff...

Excerpt: ... after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party, or a person designated by an organization that is a party under Section 2025.230, without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the depositio...

Excerpt: ...D. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.300.) As an initial point, plaintiff's points and authorities incorrectly reference a motion to compel responses to interrogatories, not a response to inspection demands. As the error did not prejudice defendant's ability to prepar e a response on the merits, the court is going to treat the motion as one to compel responses to inspection demands. A motion to compel responses to discovery requires the moving party t...

Excerpt: ...reinafter refer red to as “La Palma Intercommunity Hospital”). La Palma Intercommunity Hospital further seeks reimbursement of costs of motion from Plaintiff in the amount of $2,670.00. This Motion is made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, et seq. Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6 (a) If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for set...

Excerpt: ...ourt's ord er issued January 16, 2024, as alleged in Paragraph 3.b.2 of the [Proposed] OSC re: Contempt (ROA #174). At that time and on that date, the court will hold the arraignment and set a further hearing, evidentiary hearing, or trial, as the case may be. Plai ntiffs Leah Rae Knoll; PHA Professional Services, Inc. dba DC Plumbing, Heating and Air Conditioning; and SC Equipment Company, LLC are ORDERED to personally serve Defendant David L. C...

Excerpt: ...onsolidate for all p urposes Superior Court Case No. 30-2020 - 01171344- CU-OE -CJC and 30- 2022-01286992- CU-JR -CJC is CONTINUED to July 29, 2024, at 1:45 PM in Department C15. Request to Vacate ODA of Labor Commissioner: A trial court “may, on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order.” Code of Civil Procedure, § 5 473(d). “A judgment can be void for lack of personal or subject matter j...