Excerpt: ...l Interrogatories and Request for Monetary Sanctions of $1,680 against Plaintiff and her counsel pursuant to CCP § 2030.290 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. While the Special Interrogatories at issue were titled “Requests for Admission” on Page 3 of the Special Interrogatories attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Adam F. Summerfield filed March 22, 2022, the discovery propounded unmistakably constitute special interrogatories to...

Excerpt: ...t prevails in this Arbitration, it should be accorded attorney's fees and costs as a prevailing party and /or pursuant to Section 1780(6) of the CLRA. Western Motors also appealed to the Arbitrator's discretion under the Rules to award fees in circumstances like these where a Claimant may have failed diligently to investigate claims before pursuing them. [¶] In this matter, the Arbitrator does not consider Respondent's entitlement to fees or cos...

Excerpt: ...earing in Orange County Superior Court. Although Defendant Avalon Care Center‐Merced HY‐Lond, LLC dba Hy‐ Lond Health Care Center‐Merced filed a proof of service by email or electronic transmission showing service of the motion and request for judicial notice on March 15, 2022, the opposition filed by Plaintiff on April 18, 2022 asserts that the papers were not received until Friday, December 17, 2021, a date prior to the filing of the mo...

Excerpt: ...elations, Lilia Garcia Brower, and the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement to the First Cause of Action For Declaratory Relief Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1060 and Writ of Mandate and Injunctive Relief Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1085 asserting that Respondents have no authority to apply overtime to sheepherders; to the Second Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief pursuant to Government Code § 11350 and Code of Civil P...

Excerpt: ...elations, Lilia Garcia Brower, and the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement to the First Cause of Action For Declaratory Relief Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1060 and Writ of Mandate and Injunctive Relief Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1085 asserting that Respondents have no authority to apply overtime to sheepherders; to the Second Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief pursuant to Government Code § 11350 and Code of Civil P...

Excerpt: ...pear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. To limit the spread of the COVID‐19 virus, the court will only conduct remote hearings. Parties who contest the tentative ruling or wish to appear remotely at a hearing must contact the clerk of the court at (209) 725‐ 4240 to provide t...

Excerpt: ...ed or contributed to Kenneth Derry's unfortunate death. The motion is supported by Undisputed Facts 1‐27 which in turn are supported by admissible evidence in the form of the expert declaration of Garret Smith M.D. and the records on which his expert opinions are based which establish a prima facie case that Defendant Pacheco is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This shifts the burden to Plaintiff to establish a triable issue of material...

Excerpt: ...ne referred to in her complaint, (3) The incident involving the gizzard processing machine referred to in her complaint was the result of Plaintiff's own negligence, and (4) Plaintiff suffered no damages as a result of the incident involving the gizzard processing machine referred to in the complaint. Accordingly, Defendant Marel, Inc. has established a prima facie case that Defendant Marel, Inc. is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This s...

Excerpt: ...ant to CCP § 1008, a Motion for Reconsideration of the February 22, 2022 Order on the grounds that while the Court had interpreted the Diskeeper case to require that a motion for attorney's fees be filed 15 days after notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, a party seeking attorney's fees based on contract has at least from notice of judgment or dismissal to file a noticed motion for an award of attorney's fees, and, therefore, Defendants' mot...

Excerpt: ...nterest in all water related to the 4‐S property when it acquired such property through foreclosure. On September 29, 2021, Defendant 4‐ S Ranch Partners, LLC filed a Cross‐Complaint naming only Plaintiffs as Cross‐Defendants and on January 4, 2022, Defendant 4‐S Ranch Partners LLC filed an Amended Cross‐Complaint against Plaintiffs and new Cross‐Defendant WT Capital Lender Services. The Amended Cross‐Complaint alleges a first cau...

Excerpt: ... must call (209) 725‐4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. To limit the spread of the COVID‐19 virus, the court will only conduct remote hearings. Parties who contest the tentative ruling or wish to appear remotely at a hearing m...

Excerpt: ...Plaintiff to Defendant Citibank, N.A. is sought in connection with the Second Amended Complaint's Fifth Cause of Action for Negligence against Defendant Citibank, N.A., and Sixth Cause of Action for Conversion against Defendant Citibank N.A., brought in connection with alleged actions by Plaintiff that Defendant Citibank N.A. failed to comply with its own internal procedures in connection with an alleged embezzlement by Defendant Chima. Defendant...

Excerpt: ...ith alleged actions by Plaintiff that Defendant Citibank N.A. failed to comply with its own internal procedures in connection with an alleged embezzlement by Defendant Chima. Defendant Citibank N.A. has filed an answer containing a general denial and eleven affirmative defenses and a CrossComplaint for Equitable Indemnity and Declaratory Relief against Defendant Chima. A Stipulated Protective Order was issued by the Court on March 15, 2021. The s...

Excerpt: ...Amended Complaint's First Cause of Action for Fraud and Disparagement of Title, Third Cause of Action for Wrongful Foreclosure, Fourth Cause of Action for Elder Abuse, and Seventh Cause of Action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Demurrer to the Fifth Cause of Action to Set Aside Trustee Sale and Sixth Cause of Action to Quiet Title is OVERRULED. While there is no dispute that Defendant ECP ...

Excerpt: ... to CCP § 2023.030(a). On December 9, 2021, the continued this matter on the Court's own motion to Thursday, February 24, 2022, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8 and issued the following tentative ruling: “On the one hand, much of the discovery propounded appears excessive and unnecessary given the issues in this case. On the other hand, Plaintiff's responses are replete with broad generalizations rather than the articulation of specific facts, date...

Excerpt: ...ion in Violation of Public Policy, and (8) Interference with Cal Family Rights Act. The Court notes that a Request for Dismissal of the Eighth Cause of Action only without prejudice was filed on January 11, 2020, and entered by the court on that day. The instant motion for summary judgment/summary adjudication asserts that: (1) Plaintiff did not timely exhaust administrative remedy for discrimination claim; (2) Plaintiff did not timely exhaust ad...

Excerpt: ...sure why this one credit card is in court. We have had no contact with Plaintiff regarding a lawsuit. We wish this credit card to be part of our debt consolidation with Americor which is currently in negotiation to settle.” Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is supported by a Separate Statement of Undisputed Fact wherein Undisputed Facts 1‐9 cite admissible evidence establishing a prima facie case that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment a...

Excerpt: ... disputing the agreement's coverage of the claim involved in the action, but not as to the nature and substance of that dispute.” Since the instant requests for admission seek information about the nature and substance of a potential coverage dispute and the instant form interrogatory 17.1 would seek all facts, identification of all witnesses, and all documents relating to the substance and nature of a potential coverage dispute, the requests a...

Excerpt: ... to state a claim, (2) statute of limitations, (3) estoppel, (4) laches, (5) unclean hands, and (6) statute of frauds). The Plaintiff brings a motion for summary judgment, and the Defendant brings a cross‐motion to compel arbitration to be heard concurrently. There is not separate statement of undisputed fact filed in opposition to the motion for summary judgment, no evidence establishing any triable issue of fact, and the sole grounds for oppo...

Excerpt: ...upported by admissible evidence establishing facts 1‐18 which in turn establishes a prima facie that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment in the amount of $8,827.62 as a matter of law for the for “Open Book Account” and for “Account Stated” claims. The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725 ‐4240 to notify the court of your...

Excerpt: ...ractors GSA to Plaintiff's Complaint The Demurrer to the Verified Reverse Validation Complaint filed March 16, 2020 by Defendant San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors GSA to which Defendant City of Gustine GSA, Defendant City of Firebaugh GSA, Defendant City of Fresno GSA for DeltaMendota Subbasin Management Area B, Defendant Merced County Delta‐Mendota GSA, Defendant City of Los Banos GSA, Defendant City of Mendota GSA, Defendant City of Newm...

Excerpt: ...claims against them, that, given the nature of this coordinated action, it is not feasible at this time to determine the extent to which Plaintiff may or may not have exhausted administrative remedies. This Court finds that the Verified Reverse Validation Complaint filed March 16, 2020 is timely filed. Finally, this Court. Plaintiff's objection to some of the demurrers on the grounds that they are procedurally defective is also OVERRULED and this...

Excerpt: ...ractors GSA to Plaintiff's Complaint The Demurrer to the Verified Reverse Validation Complaint filed March 16, 2020 by Defendant San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors GSA to which Defendant City of Gustine GSA, Defendant City of Firebaugh GSA, Defendant City of Fresno GSA for DeltaMendota Subbasin Management Area B, Defendant Merced County Delta‐Mendota GSA, Defendant City of Los Banos GSA, Defendant City of Mendota GSA, Defendant City of Newm...

Excerpt: ...claims against them, that, given the nature of this coordinated action, it is not feasible at this time to determine the extent to which Plaintiff may or may not have exhausted administrative remedies. This Court finds that the Verified Reverse Validation Complaint filed March 16, 2020 is timely filed. Finally, this Court. Plaintiff's objection to some of the demurrers on the grounds that they are procedurally defective is also OVERRULED and this...

Excerpt: ...al of the residential real property from the rental market”), the Court finds the language used in the notice (“Owner intends to withdraw the Premises from the rental market”) is substantially similar and sufficient to constitute a cause of action for no‐fault just cause eviction under the Tenant Protection Act of 2019. The Court notes that whether the alleged reason for termination of tenancy is true is an issue of fact for trial. Defend...