Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

3489 Results

Location: Fresno x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 223))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 3200,100
Array
(
)
2019.10.31 Motion for Summary Judgment 176
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.31
Excerpt: ...cing evidence showing that he did not breach the standard of care when he treated decedent, and that he did not cause decedent's injuries or death. “The standard of care in a medical malpractice case requires that physicians exercise in diagnosis and treatment that reasonable degree of skill, knowledge and care ordinarily possessed and exercised by members of the medical profession under similar circumstances. [Citations.] ‘ “The standard o...
2019.10.31 Motion for Protective Order 469
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.31
Excerpt: ...r to discuss the defects in the motion; and they are numerous. On a motion for a protective order seeking to restrict the disclosure of trade secrets, the moving party has the burden to prove, by the preponderance of the evidence, that there is good cause for issuance of a protective order. That party must provide an affidavit or declaration which: 1) lists the declarant's qualifications to give an opinion; 2) identifies the alleged trade secret;...
2019.10.31 Motion for Attorneys' Fees 395
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.31
Excerpt: ...d on April 3, 2018, on the ground that there was no claim therein against Wood and Access Medical providing for recovery of attorneys' fees other than Penal Code § 496(c), which Judge Snauffer found unrecoverable in this case. That ruling was reversed on appeal: “we reverse the trial court's denial of Switzer's motion for attorney fees premised on section 496(c), and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings to determin...
2019.10.31 Demurrer 850
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.31
Excerpt: ...orth in boldface typeset. Explanation: A general demurrer admits the truth of all material allegations and a Court will “give the complaint a reasonable interpretation by reading it as a whole and all its parts in their context.” (People ex re. Lungren v. Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 300.) A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that ar...
2019.10.31 Demurrer 374
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.31
Excerpt: ..., are deemed admitted irrespective of the difficulty of proof at trial. [Citation.] The allegations are to be liberally construed with a view to substantial justice between the parties.” (Universal By‐Products, Inc. v. City of Modesto (1974) 43 Cal.App.3d 145, 151.) Here, Cross‐Defendant City of Parlier (“City”) demurs to the second amended cross‐complaint (“SACC”) on the ground that the claims were late‐filed pursuant to the Go...
2019.10.30 Motion to Enforce Settlement 807
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.30
Excerpt: ...parties argue over whether or not the May 2019 agreement was rescinded. The implication is that if the May agreement was rescinded, the February 2019 agreement is revived and can now be enforced pursuant to section 664.6. However, the evidence shows that the May 2019 agreement functioned as a novation to the February 2019 agreement. (See Civ. Code § 1531, subd. (1) [a novation is made by the substitution of a new obligation between the same part...
2019.10.30 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 909
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.30
Excerpt: ... Civ. Proc., § 473; Cherrigan v. City etc. of San Francisco (1968) 262 Cal.App.2d 643, 653.) Where no prejudice is shown to the adverse party, “courts are bound to apply a policy of liberality in permitting amendments to the complaint at any stage of the proceedings, up to and including trial.” (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761; Higgins v. Del Faro (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 558, 564; Congleton v. Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co. (1...
2019.10.30 Petition to Compel Arbitration 717
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.30
Excerpt: ...agreement, and that even if it is determined valid, defendants waived their right to arbitration when they persuaded plaintiffs to forgo the Labor Commissioner proceeding. The court finds plaintiffs' argument regarding waiver persuasive. On a procedural note, defendants argue that this court should not consider plaintiffs' opposition because plaintiffs were required to respond to their petition within 10 days, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure ...
2019.10.30 Motion to Strike 430
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.30
Excerpt: ...t any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading; or strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. (Code Civ. Proc. §436; see also Mercury Interactive Corp. v. Klein (2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 60, 104, fn. 35.) An “immaterial allegation in a pleading” includes an “allegation that is not essential to the statement of a claim”...
2019.10.30 Demurrer 305
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.30
Excerpt: ...o run from service by the clerk of the minute order. Explanation:  Defect in the Motion Plaintiff is correct about the defect in defendant's motion: there is no “demurrer” included. Here, where the various components involved in the motion are combined into one, this means that a separately‐captioned portion which distinctly specifies the grounds of demurrer must be included. It was not. Instead, defendant's “notice” section simply i...
2019.10.30 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 725
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.30
Excerpt: ...on of the separate causes of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c.) Explanation: Plaintiffs Cook and TJC Partners move for summary judgment of the entire complaint, or in the alternative adjudication of their breach of contract claims, contending that defendant Holmes owes $334,240 to Cook and $375,000 to TJC which he has failed to repay, despite having executed a series of promissory notes and guarantees of repayment. Plaintiffs also point to the fa...
2019.10.29 Motion to Authorize Disclosure of Records or for Issue Restrictions 358
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.29
Excerpt: ...on appears in the Court's files. The parties appear to concede that the documents at issue are subject to federal privacy protections. The question is whether the relevance identified by Defendants is sufficient to pierce that privacy. As noted by Defendants, the privacy right is balanced against the need for the evidence in question. (Williams v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531, 552.) Defendants have identified two separate items of discover...
2019.10.29 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 530
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.29
Excerpt: ...294, subd. (c)(1); see also College Hosp. Inc. v. Superior Court (1994) 8 Cal.4th 704, 725 [“absent an intent to injure the plaintiff, ‘malice' requires more than a willful and conscious disregard of the plaintiff's interests. The additional component of ‘despicable conduct' must be found”].) “'Despicable' conduct is conduct which is so vile, base, contemptible, miserable, wretched or loathsome that it would be looked down upon and desp...
2019.10.29 Motion for Relief from Provisions of Government Code 945.4 087
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.29
Excerpt: ...ix months of the accrual of the cause of action. (Gov't Code. §911.2.) The parties do not dispute that the claim was filed late. (See also Gov't Code § 945.3 (claim‐filing requirement is not tolled while criminal charges are pending).) An application to present a late claim must be sent within one year of the accrual of the cause of action. (Gov't Code §911.4.) Respondent does not dispute that the application for leave to file a late claim i...
2019.10.29 Demurrer 122 (2)
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.29
Excerpt: ...d Complaint are to be set in boldface type. To overrule the demurrer. The answer shall be filed within 20 days of the date of this order unless a Second Amended Complaint is timely filed. Explanation: Motion to Strike Allegations of fraud are not improper in claims of breach of contract against a public entity. (see E.H. Morrill Co. v. State (1967) 65 Cal.2d 787, 794.) However, there are no supporting facts of the claims which are the subject of ...
2019.10.24 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 489
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.24
Excerpt: ...ovided that both plaintiff and the dealership “agree that any claim, dispute, and/or controversy that either party may have against one another…arising from, related to, or having any relationship or connection whatsoever with [Plaintiff] seeking employment with, employment by, or other association with the [Dealership], whether based on tort, contract, statutory, or equitable law, or otherwise…shall be submitted to and determined exclusive...
2019.10.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 047
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.24
Excerpt: ...tion must be provided subject to the protective order on file. The further responses are to be served no later than November 7, 2019. To grant sanctions, but to reduce the amount to $885.00, payable by defendant and his counsel by November 7, 2019. Explanation: Interrogatories Nos. 6 and 8 seek the addresses of banks and other financial institutions where defendant Lisenko has had accounts in the past 13 years. Interrogatories Nos. 7 and 9 seek a...
2019.10.24 Motion to Disqualify Counsel 169
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.24
Excerpt: ...nner connected with a judicial proceeding before it, in every matter pertaining thereto.' (Code Civ. Proc., § 128, subd. (a)(5); [citations].)” (People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. SpeeDee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1135, 1145 (SpeeDee Oil).) Motions to disqualify generally arise in one of two contexts: (1) in cases of successive representation, where an attorney seeks to represent a client with interests that are potential...
2019.10.24 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint 712
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.24
Excerpt: ... . a summons may be served by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint during usual office hours in his or her office or, if no physical address is known, at his or her usual mailing address[.]” (Code Civ. Proc. §415.20(a).) “If a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with reasonable diligence be personally delivered to the person to be served . . . a summons may be served by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at the person's ...
2019.10.24 Motion to Strike 731
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.24
Excerpt: ...d amended complaint detailing the basis for the punitive damages. All new or amended allegations are to be set forth in boldface typeset. Explanation: A motion to strike can be used to: “(a) [s]trike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading[;]” or “(b) [s]trike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court.” (Code Civ. ...
2019.10.24 Petition to Abate Substandard Building, Appoint Receiver 990
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.24
Excerpt: ...ds published in the California Building Standards Code, the State Housing Law, and other rules and regulations adopted pursuant to the State Housing Law. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 17980 to 17982.) When the violations or conditions of the property involve noncompliance with the requirements of the State Housing Law, or with the requirements of the published State Building Standards Code that implement the State Housing Law, or with local ordinance...
2019.10.23 Motion for Sanctions 500
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.23
Excerpt: ...) the motions were untimely as to the initial discovery responses, and (2) the court did not give permission to file the motions after the PTDC as required by Local Rule 2.1.17. In opposing the motions to compel, plaintiff requested $6,000 in monetary sanctions. The tentative ruling did not address the request for sanctions. Neither party requested oral argument, and so on August 8 the tentative ruling became the order of the court. Plaintiff the...
2019.10.23 Demurrer 225
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.23
Excerpt: ...71) 5 Cal. 3d 584, 591. Defendant Logan is alleged to be the owner of the property, to have leased the property to the other defendants, and to have done so with the knowledge of their intention to use the property as a board and care facility. The amended pleading specifically alleges that Logan herself was negligent in hiring, supervising, and retaining employee caregivers. See paragraph 46. The new allegation that Logan herself was negligent i...
2019.10.23 Application for Writ of Possession 810
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.23
Excerpt: ... an undertaking in order to obtain the writ. (Code Civ. Proc. § 515.010, subd. (b).) Explanation: Under Code of Civil Procedure section 512.010, (a) Upon the filing of the complaint or at any time thereafter, the plaintiff may apply pursuant to this chapter for a writ of possession by filing a written application for the writ with the court in which the action is brought. (b) The application shall be executed under oath and shall include all of ...
2019.10.22 Motion to Strike 278
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.22
Excerpt: ...endant may move to strike allegations from a pleading in two situations: (a) the allegation is “irrelevant, false, or improper” or “superfluous” or “abusive” and (b) where the “pleading was not drawn in conformity with the laws of the state or a court rule.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 436(a), (b).) Paragraphs 65.a), 65.i), 70, 75 and 78 These allegations are part of the fifth cause of action for bad faith against Infinity on behalf of Ca...
2019.10.22 Motion for Summary Judgment 176
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.22
Excerpt: ...le their substantive opposition and expert declaration by October 15, 2019. Defendant's reply shall be due five calendar days before the continued hearing date. Explanation: Under Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (h), “If it appears from the affidavits submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be...
2019.10.22 Motion for Sanctions 172
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.22
Excerpt: ...nd Code of Civil Procedure section 575.2, which allow for sanctions for non‐compliance with the California Rules of Court and local rules. In this case, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant and her counsel are in violation of California Rules of Court, rule 3.894 and Fresno Superior Court Local Rule 2.4.1 and Civil Standing Order No. 07‐0628. Together, these rules require that all parties and attorneys of record must attend all mediation sessions...
2019.10.22 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 031
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.22
Excerpt: ...s order by the clerk. New allegations/language must be set in boldface type. Explanation: Plaintiff seeks leave to amend in order to substitute Kerwin Jackson (“Jackson”) and KJ Worldwide Investments, Inc. (“KJ Worldwide”) as Does 1 and 2, respectively, and to allege that, at all relevant times, they were agents or employees of defendants David Maclachlan and Nuestra Casa Real Estate (“Nuestra Casa”), and that either they or Maclachla...
2019.10.22 Motions to Decertify Class, to Certify Class for Labor Code Section 203 624
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.22
Excerpt: ...'s motion to decertify and to grant plaintiffs' motion to certify with directions. To set February 19, 2020, at 3:30 p.m., as a case management and trialsetting conference in Department 503. Explanation: DECERTIFICATION MOTION 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal decision in this matter specifically called on this Court to address the manageability issue as the case progressed: It does not appear a manageability analysis was explicitly conducted i...
2019.10.22 Motion for Attorney Fees 646
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.22
Excerpt: ...roduced as the result of litigation. (Galbiso v. Orosi Public Utility Dist. (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1063, 1088; see also Sukumar v. City of San Diego (2017) 14 Cal.App.5th 451, 464‐465 [public entity produced pivotal email, photographs and 146 email documents at a court ordered PMK deposition after “unequivocally claim[ing] it had produced every document”. . ..].) Additionally, a plaintiff who prevails in a CPRA action is entitled to an awar...
2019.10.17 Demurrer 399
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.17
Excerpt: ...ndant's demurrer, in its entirety. Explanation: In the case at bar, plaintiffs allege two causes of action: (1) violation of Government Code sections 820, subdivision (a) & 815.2, et. seq.; and (2) negligence. Only the first cause of action is directed at moving parties. Defendants demur to cause of action one, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivisions (e) & (f). Defendants argue that: (1) the facts are insufficient to alle...
2019.10.17 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 105
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.17
Excerpt: ...by a judgment in an action brought by the government. The act authorizes a representative action only for the purpose of seeking statutory penalties for Labor Code violations (Lab.Code, section 2699, subds. (a), (g)), and an action to recover civil penalties ‘is fundamentally a law enforcement action designed to protect the public and not to benefit private parties.” Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal. 4th 348, 381....
2019.10.17 Motion for Summary Judgment 965
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.17
Excerpt: ...ation: Plaintiff has sued defendants Abolnik, Galamgam, and Nwaka for elder neglect based on their alleged failure to intervene to protect him from defendant Hodanu, who allegedly assaulted and battered plaintiff. He alleges that he is over the age of 65 and an inpatient at the Department of State Hospitals – Coalinga, and thus he is an elder or dependent adult. (Complaint, ¶ 1.) Hodanu allegedly attacked and battered plaintiff on November 12,...
2019.10.17 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 643
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.17
Excerpt: ...r summary judgment, or alternatively summary adjudication, of both his complaint and the cross‐complaint filed by Derek Kazanjian. This is a repetitive motions, seeking summary judgment of the same pleadings and causes of action, and raising the same issues, as that denied on May 17, 2019. A party may not move for summary judgment “based on issues asserted in a prior motion for summary adjudication” that has been denied by the court unless ...
2019.10.17 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 011
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.17
Excerpt: ...hnicon”) as to the entire complaint. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c.) Technicon shall submit a proposed judgment consistent with this court's order within ten (10) days of the date of service of this order. Explanation: Technicon moves for summary judgment on the ground that all of the claims of plaintiff Hydroelectric Penetrations, L.P. (“HP”) against it are all barred by the settlement agreement and release executed between Technicon and Ernie ...
2019.10.16 Motion to Compel Arbitration 084
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.16
Excerpt: ...). Plaintiff sues to recover unpaid back commissions owed under the Independent Producer's Agreement (“IP Agreement”). Plaintiff also claims that HRBC president Enrique Romero made defamatory statements about plaintiff in connection with this dispute. The Complaint alleges the following causes of action: 1. Breach of Contract 2. Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing 3. Conversion 4. Unfair Competition and Violation of Busi...
2019.10.16 Motion for Summary Judgment 669
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.16
Excerpt: ...leadings. Second, we determine whether the moving party has met its statutory burden of proof. Once the defendant has made such a showing, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to produce evidence that a triable issue of fact exists as to an essential element of the cause of action. The third and final step is to determine whether the opposing party has demonstrated that a triable issue of fact exists as to the cause of action. In determining whethe...
2019.10.16 Motion for Class Certification 618
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.16
Excerpt: ...ers, mental health rehab specialist, PSCs, caseworkers, personal service coordinators, education and mental health specialists, direct service aids, mental health professionals – unlicensed (same as mental health therapist – licensed), and who were provided with cell‐phones or radio communication devices or cell phone stipends by Turning Point. To also grant certification to a subclass of all such persons who separated from employment at an...
2019.10.16 Motion to Set Aside Default 289
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.16
Excerpt: ... that she is entitled to have the default set aside because she was not properly served with the complaint and summons or that the default was entered less than 30 days after she was served, she has failed to meet her burden of showing that the complaint and summons were not properly served, or that she was served after the date indicated on the proof of service. “‘[C]ompliance with the statutory procedures for service of process is essential...
2019.10.16 Demurrer, Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 078
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.16
Excerpt: ...Plaintiff shall have ten (10) court days from the clerk's service of this order in which to file a second amended complaint. All new or amended allegations are to be set forth in boldface typeset. Explanation: Demurrer A general demurrer admits the truth of all material allegations and a court will “give the complaint a reasonable interpretation by reading it as a whole and all its parts in their context.” (People ex re. Lungren v. Superior C...
2019.10.16 Demurrer 238
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.16
Excerpt: ...from service by the clerk of the minute order. New allegations in the Second Amended Complaint are to be set in boldface type. Explanation: Where the complaint fails to plead ultimate facts, the complaint is subject to demurrer. (Code of Civil Procedure § 430.10(e); Berger v. California Ins. Guar. Ass'n (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 989, 1006.) Essentially, “[a] complaint must allege the ultimate facts necessary to the statement of an actionable clai...
2019.10.16 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 697
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.16
Excerpt: ... Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 853. If a defendant makes this showing, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to demonstrate that one or more material facts exist as to the cause of action or as to a defense to a cause of action. (CCP § 437(c), subdivision(p)(2).) In a summary judgment motion, the pleadings determine the scope of relevant issues. (Nieto v. Blue Shield of Calif. Life & Health Ins. Co. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 60, 74.) A defendant need onl...
2019.10.10 Motion to Compel Responses, for Production of Docs, for Monetary Sanctions 877
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.10
Excerpt: ...ories, Request for Production of Documents, and Requests for Admissions, and for Monetary Sanctions Tentative Ruling: To grant plaintiff's motions to compel defendants Auto USA and Tidalwave Finance Corporation to serve verified responses without objections to plaintiff's form and special interrogatories and request for production of documents. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290; 2031.300.) Defendants shall serve verified responses without objections...
2019.10.8 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 191
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.8
Excerpt: ...ff also prays for compensatory, general and punitive damages. Defendant's Demurrer Defendant demurs to both causes of action. Defendant moves pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e)—failure to state a cause of action. Defendant also demurs to plaintiff's request for punitive damages.2 5. First Cause of Action: Assault The essential elements of a cause of action for assault are: (1) defendant acted with intent to caus...
2019.10.8 Motion for Monetary, Issue, and Terminating Sanctions 569
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.8
Excerpt: ... clerk. To deny the request for terminating, issue, and evidence sanctions at this point. Explanation: Nowhere in Mr. Waterman's declaration or in the opposition argument is it acknowledged that Mr. Waterman received notice of the Request for Pretrial Discovery Conference (“PDC”) well before his planned time of “unavailability.” Thus, he had time to file an Opposition in order to signal his willingness to participate in the PDC process. T...
2019.10.8 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 165
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.8
Excerpt: ...Cross‐Defendants The Woodmont Company and Greg Newman to Strike Portions of the Prime Cross‐Complaint Tentative Ruling: To sustain the general demurrers to the second and third causes of action of the Prime Cross‐Complaint, without leave to amend. The motion to strike is ordered off calendar as moot, given the ruling on demurrer. Cross‐Defendants The Woodmont Company and Greg Newman are directed to submit to this court, within 7 days of s...
2019.10.8 Demurrer 327
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.8
Excerpt: ...d ten days leave to amend. All changes must be in bold. The time in which an amendment may be filed will run from service by the clerk of the minute order. Explanation: In the case at bar, plaintiff alleges four causes of action: (1) breach of contract; (2) wrongful termination – age discrimination; (3) wrongful termination – gender discrimination; and (4) disparate treatment. Defendant demurs to each cause of action based upon Code of Civil ...
2019.10.3 Demurrer 403
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.3
Excerpt: ...onable interpretation by reading it as a whole and all its parts in their context.” (People ex re. Lungren v. Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 300.) A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) Facts appearing in exhibits attached to the complaint will also be accepted as...
2019.10.3 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 182
Location: Fresno
Judge: Tharpe, D. Tyler
Hearing Date: 2019.10.3
Excerpt: ...e causes of action, the motion to strike items 4 thru 6 stated in the Notice of Motion is denied. To deny the motion to strike as to items 3 and 7 (re punitive damages) stated in the Notice of Motion. To grant the motion to strike as to items 1 and 2 (re pain and suffering) stated in the Notice of Motion. The plaintiffs are granted 20 days leave to file a First Amended Complaint. The time in which the Complaint can be amended will run from the co...
2019.10.3 Motion for Summary Judgment 212
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.3
Excerpt: ...y judgment order. Explanation: As the moving party, a defendant bears the initial burden of proof to show that the plaintiff cannot establish one or more elements of the causes of action or to show that there is a complete defense. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(p)(2).) Only after the moving party has carried this burden of proof does the burden of proof shift to the other party to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists—and th...
2019.10.3 Motion to Compel Arbitration, for Sanctions 566
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.10.3
Excerpt: ...ation: 1. Objections The Court sustains all objections made by defendants Gurvinder Kandola and Julie Su, referred to herein collectively as the “Labor Commissioner.” The Court also notes that the evidence supplied with the reply papers on the issue of commerce is devoid of any actual ads allegedly placed in out of state publications or invoices showing that was done. There are no receipts or order confirmation for purchases from out of state...
2019.10.3 Motion to Compel Production of Video Footage 733
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.3
Excerpt: ...o both of the following: (a) Preserve the rights of attorneys to prepare cases for trial with that degree of privacy necessary to encourage them to prepare their cases thoroughly and to investigate not only the favorable but the unfavorable aspects of those cases. (b) Prevent attorneys from taking undue advantage of their adversary's industry and efforts. Code of Civil Procedure section 2018.030 provides: (a) A writing that reflects an attorn...
2019.10.2 Demurrer 831
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.10.2
Excerpt: ...e 30‐day period permitted by law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 430.40, subd. (a).) However, “[a] motion for judgment on the pleadings is equivalent of a general demurrer but is made after the time for demurrer has expired. The rules governing demurrers apply.” (Evans v. California Trailer Court (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 540, 548.) Code of Civil Procedure section 438, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(ii) permits a motion for judgment on the pleadings by a defendant...
2019.10.2 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 357
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.2
Excerpt: ...to Frazer, for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10, subd. (e).) To sustain the demurrer as to the eighth cause action, for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as to both Frazer and Matthews' estate. (Ibid.) To overrule the demurrer as to the ninth cause of action. To deny the motion to strike and grant in part, as discussed below. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 435, 43...
2019.10.2 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 234
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.2
Excerpt: ... of action: (1) retaliation in violation of FEHA, Gov. Code § 12940(h); (2) violation of Labor Code § 6310; and (3) violation of Labor Code § 6311. Summary judgment was previously granted as to the first cause of action, and it should not have been included in the SAC. Defendants now move for judgment on the pleadings as to the remaining causes of action on the ground that plaintiff did not comply with the Government Tort Claims Act. "[A] ...
2019.10.2 Motion for Summary Adjudication 697
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.2
Excerpt: ...ainst defendants Young, Clarke, and Podratz. (Ibid.) Defendants shall submit a proposed judgment consistent with this order within 10 days of the date of service of the order. Explanation: First, the individual defendants move for summary adjudication of the discrimination, retaliation, and failure to prevent discrimination and retaliation claims against them on the ground that individuals cannot be held liable for discrimination or retaliation u...
2019.10.1 Demurrer 444
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.10.1
Excerpt: ...mplaint (FAC) alleged against Defendants Laton Unified School District, Laton High School, and Jason Krikava for failing to file the claims within the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff shall have ten (10) court days in which to file the Second Amended Complaint (SAC). Any new or altered allegations shall be set forth in boldface typeset. Explanation: A general demurrer admits the truth of all material allegations and a Court will “gi...
2019.10.1 Motion for Attorney's Fees
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.1
Excerpt: ...s based on actual time expended, determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” (Civ. Code, § 1794, subd. (d).) The statute “requires the trial court to make an initial determination of the actual time expended; and then to ascertain whether under all the circumstances of the case the amount of actual time expended and the monetary charge being made f...
2019.10.1 Motion for Class Certification and Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement 707
Location: Fresno
Judge: Simpson, A.M.
Hearing Date: 2019.10.1
Excerpt: ...ction is proper. Luckey v. Superior Court (2014) 228 Cal. App. 4th 81 (rev. denied). See also Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions (T.R. Westlaw, 2017) Section 7:3: “The parties' representation of an uncontested motion for class certification does not relieve the Court of the duty of determining whether certification is appropriate.” The case so requiring is Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor (1997) 521 U.S. 591, 620 (“Amchem”): “Confronted wi...
2019.1.31 Motion to Set Aside Default, for Protective Order 752
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.1.31
Excerpt: ...cal Rules, rule 2.1.17.) Explanation: Motion to Set Aside Default The court may relieve a party from a judgment, order or other proceeding taken against him or her as a result of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect, where the application for relief is made within six months of entry of the judgment, etc. (Code Civ. Proc. §473(b).) Application for relief may be based on either (1) an attorney affidavit of fault, in which event re...
2019.1.31 Motion to Dismiss Petitions 409
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.31
Excerpt: ... petitions, without prejudice. However, the court does intend to set a status conference on March 28, 2019 at 3:30 p.m. in Department 502 and require petitioners' counsel to update the court on the status of the administrative records in each case, as well as whether the cases have been set for hearings on the merits. If petitioners fail to lodge an administrative record in each case and set the cases for hearings on the merits within a reasonabl...
2019.1.31 Motion to Discharge Writ of Attachment and Release Property 260
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.31
Excerpt: ...erty released from levy. (Code Civ. Proc., § 485.240, subd. (a).) On a showing of “clear and convincing” reasons, courts have inherent power to vacate ex parte attachments without any notice (i.e., on defendant's application). (Western Steel & Ship Repair, Inc. v. RMI, Inc. (1986) 176 Cal.App.3d 1108, 1116‐1117.) At the hearing, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the attachment was proper. (Loeb & Loeb v. Beverly Glen Music...
2019.1.31 Motion to Compel Initial Responses 653
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.31
Excerpt: ...ral, set one, directed to Defendant Duchscherer; and request for production of documents, set one, directed to Defendant Duchscherer. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(b), 2031.300(b).) Defendants Tobias and Duchscherer are ordered to serve complete verified responses to the discovery set forth above, without objection, within 15 days of the clerk's service of the minute order. To impose monetary sanctions in favor of Plaintiff, against Defendants T...
2019.1.31 Motion to Compel Depositions, Appoint Discovery Referee 853
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.31
Excerpt: ... some issue therein, be referred for decision to a third party (referee). Such reference may be made pursuant to the parties' agreement or, in certain cases, without the parties' consent. Under Code of Civil Procedure § 638, the court may order a reference either: • “(U)pon the agreement of the parties filed with the clerk, or judge, or entered in the minutes ... ”; or • “(U)pon the motion of a party to a written contract or le...
2019.1.31 Motion for Summary Judgment 178
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.31
Excerpt: ...submitted within 5 days of notice of the ruling. Explanation: Standard of Care The appropriate standard of care required of a medical professional is not a matter of common lay knowledge. Therefore, except in cases of “egregious” medical negligence, expert medical testimony is required in medical malpractice actions to establish the standard of care required of a physician (or other health care provider) under the circumstances. See Flowers v...
2019.1.30 Motion to Dismiss, to Consolidate 849
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.30
Excerpt: ...roposed judgment consistent with this order. To take the motion to consolidate off calendar in light of the dismissal of the Morones action. Explanation: Defendants Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc. and Del Monte Fresh Porduce (West Coast), INc. (collectively, “Del Monte”) move to dismiss Morones v. Del Monte Fresno Produce N.A., Inc. et al., Case No. 14CECG02849. The action was filed on January 31, 2014. "An action shall be brought to t...
2019.1.30 Motion to Amend Answer, for Leave to File Complaint 915
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.30
Excerpt: ...deny all motions. Explanation: The motions before the court seek leave to file cross‐complaints and to amend defendants' answers. All of the proposed new and amended pleadings are premised on factual allegations postulating alleged concealment and misrepresentations by plaintiff before the moving defendants became members as to whether plaintiff was running a deficit, was mismanaged, etc. Insofar as the proposed amendments seek to assert a cros...
2019.1.30 Motion for Sanctions, to Amend 230
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.30
Excerpt: ...der a party, the party's attorney, or both, to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by another party as a result of actions or tactics, made in bad faith, that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.” (Code Civ. Proc. §128.5(a); see Levy v. Blum (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 625, 635 [§128.5 which “permits the award of attorney fees, not simply as appropriate compensation to the prevailing pa...
2019.1.30 Motion for Class Certification and Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement 707
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.30
Excerpt: ...n for class certification and preliminary approval of settlement is proof that the matter truly is litigated as a class action, more such complex motions requiring substantial time to resolve are expected. The matter is therefore deemed complex pursuant to Rule 3.400(b)(1); the complex fees must be paid on or before February 22, 2019. 2. Class Certification a. Standards An agreement of the parties is not sufficient to establish a class for settle...
2019.1.29 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 076
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.29
Excerpt: ...t v. County of Los Angeles (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 125, 145.)  To sustain defendant's demurrers based upon: (1) Gurpreet's lack of capacity; (2) Jasbir's claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress which are based upon: 31‐315.2; 31‐320.5; 31‐335.1 and 31‐405 (for both mandatory duty and vicarious liability); (3) social worker liability; (4) negligent hiring; (5) acts of independent contractors; and (6) plaintiffs' allegation of...
2019.1.29 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 322
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.1.29
Excerpt: ...nsufficient to show a good faith attempt to confer with defendant regarding the motion. (Code Civ. Proc. § 439, subd. (a).) Plaintiff's counsel shall file a supplemental declaration regarding her meet and confer efforts by March 15, 2019. Explanation: “Before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to this chapter, the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subj...
2019.1.29 Motion for Summary Judgment 869
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.1.29
Excerpt: ...defendant breached the duty, and that the breach was a proximate or legal cause of injuries suffered by the plaintiff.” (United States Liab. Ins. Co. v. Haidinger–Hayes, Inc. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 586, 594.) Likewise, in order to establish premises liability on a negligence theory, a plaintiff must prove duty, breach, causation and damages. (Ortega v. Kmart Corp. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1200, 1205. Defendants' motion is based solely on the theory that pr...
2019.1.29 Motion to Tax Costs 562
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.29
Excerpt: ... October 1, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation deeming the prematurely filed Memorandum of Costs timely filed. See ¶ 6 of the Stipulation. On November 13, 2018, notice of entry of judgment was filed. On November 26, 2018, Defendant filed a motion seeking to tax costs; specifically, the amount of $29,446.44 listed at line 13 as “interest pursuant to CC § 33289.” No opposition was filed. Merits In the case at bench, an appeal has been file...
2019.1.29 Petition to Compel Arbitration 396
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.29
Excerpt: ...that controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for rescission of the agreement.” (Code Civ. Proc. §1281.2(a), (b); see Espejo v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 104...
2019.1.25 Motion for Summary Judgment 824
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.25
Excerpt: ...om the affidavits submitted in opposition to a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication, or both, that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for reasons stated, be presented, the court shall deny the motion, order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had, or make any other order as may be just. (Civ. Proc. Code §437c, subd. (h).) A continuance (normally a matter within the court...
2019.1.25 Application for Default Judgment 033
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.25
Excerpt: ...erned by CCP §§872.010 through 874.240. CCP § 872.210 states: (a) A partition action may be commenced and maintained by any of the following persons: (1) A coowner of personal property. (2) An owner of an estate of inheritance, an estate for life, or an estate for years in real property where such property or estate therein is owned by several persons concurrently or in successive estates. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), an action between...
2019.1.24 Motion to Vacate Judgment, OSC Re Why Service Should not be Quashed 317
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.24
Excerpt: ... proofs of service for the opposition indicate that it was served, by regular mail, on January 11, 2019 as required. Motion to Vacate. When an application for enforcement of a sister‐state judgment is filed, a judgment debtor has thirty days from service in which to challenge the sister‐state judgment. (Code Civ.Proc. § 1710.40 subd.(b).) Challenges to the judgment on the grounds that there was no subject matter or personal jurisdiction in t...
2019.1.24 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 629
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.1.24
Excerpt: ...ipt of the hearing), as defense counsel states they did. Further, the trial minute order from September 10, 2018, indicates it was “not reported,” so it does not appear it could have been put “on the record.” Thus, the court can only consider the terms of the written settlement agreement to determine if it is enforceable pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 (“section 664.6”). The written agreement was signed only by Mrs. ...
2019.1.24 Motion to Bifurcate 807
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.24
Excerpt: ...ego will unduly prejudice defendants; and (4) bifurcation will result in jury confusion. Plaintiffs oppose, arguing judicial economy will not be promoted because there is significant overlap between the evidence related to alter ego liability and the evidence that will be relevant to the balance of the issues. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1048(b) the court “in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials wi...
2019.1.24 Motion for Summary Judgment 023
Location: Fresno
Judge: McGuire, Rosie
Hearing Date: 2019.1.24
Excerpt: ...g parties shall submit proposed judgments consistent with the court's order within 10 days of the date of this order. Explanation: California State University's Motion: Plaintiff has alleged only one cause of action against CSU based on CSU's allegedly negligent hiring training, supervision, retention, and investigation of defendant Andres Perez‐Esteban. However, defendant has presented evidence that it never hired Esteban, and that Esteban was...
2019.1.24 Motion for Settlement Approval 071
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.1.24
Excerpt: ...42,500, with the balance going to the nonappearing defendants. Any supplemental papers must be received by the Court no later than Friday, February 22, 2019. Explanation: The legislature requires the Court to approve any settlement of a complaint seeking civil penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”). (See Labor Code §§2699, subd.(l); 2689, et seq.) However, neither the Legislature nor the California Lab...
2019.1.24 Motion by Receiver to Employ Counsel 568
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.1.24
Excerpt: ...ommencing with Section 701.510) of Chapter 3 of Division 2 of Title 9. The sale is not final until confirmed by the court.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 568.5.) The proposed sale of the property will be conducted according to law. California Rule of Court 3.1180 provides: A receiver must not employ an attorney without the approval of the court. The application for approval to employ an attorney must be in writing and must state: (1) The necessity for t...
2019.1.23 Demurrer 279
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.1.23
Excerpt: ...aint, which will run from service by the clerk of the minute order. New allegations/language must be set in boldface type. Explanation: Second Cause of Action: Failure to Engage in Good Faith Interactive Process It is a jurisdictional prerequisite to state a claim under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) that the plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies before commencing a lawsuit. (Gov. Code, §§ 12960, 12901, 12925, subd. (b); O...
2019.1.23 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 712
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.1.23
Excerpt: ...errule Defendants' demurrer to the remaining causes of action. To grant Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiff's claims for punitive, special, and exemplary damages, with leave to amend. Plaintiff is granted 20 days, commencing from service of the minute order by the clerk, to file and serve a first amended complaint. All new allegations in the amended complaint are to be set in boldface type. Explanation: Demurrer In testing a pleading against a...
2019.1.23 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 709
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.23
Excerpt: ...in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect; and may, upon like terms, enlarge the time for answer or demurrer. The court may likewise, in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading or proceeding in other particulars...” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a).) “ ‘Code of Civil Procedure section 473, which gives the courts power to permit amendments in fur...
2019.1.23 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement 741
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.1.23
Excerpt: ...on settlement, plaintiff also seeks class certification for the purposes of approving the settlement. Therefore, the court must first determine whether the class should be certified before deciding whether the settlement should be preliminarily approved. “Code of Civil Procedure section 382 authorizes class actions ‘when the question is one of a common or general interest, of many persons, or when the parties are numerous, and it is impractic...
2019.1.23 Motion for Summary Adjudication 086
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2019.1.23
Excerpt: ...ake a prima facie showing that there are no triable issues of material fact. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) A defendant meets that burden by showing that one or more elements of the cause(s) of action cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense thereto. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subds. (p)(2), (o)(2).) Once the moving party has met its initial burden, the burden shifts to the opposing party to produ...
2019.1.23 Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted, for Sanctions 910
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2019.1.23
Excerpt: ...on for sanctions without prejudice. Plaintiff has not successfully made a motion. Explanation: The evidence presented is insufficient to support the motion. All that need be shown in the moving papers is that the discovery was properly served on the opposing party, that the time to respond has expired, and that no response of any kind has been served. (See Leach v. Sup.Ct. (1980) 111 CA3d 902, 905–906.) Plaintiff has failed to provide evidence ...
2019.1.23 Motion to Transfer and Consolidate Cases 532
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2019.1.23
Excerpt: ...ia Rule of Court 3.500(e). Moving party is also ordered to “take all appropriate action necessary to assure that the transfer takes place and that proceedings are initiated in” San Joaquin County Superior Court “to complete consolidation” with the case pending in that court, pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.500(f). The trial date of February 25, 2019, mandatory settlement conference date of January 30, 2019, and trial readiness hear...
2018.8.9 Petition to Compel Arbitration 487
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2018.8.9
Excerpt: ...esolution. To this end, ‘arbitration agreements should be liberally construed', with ‘doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues [being] resolved in favor of arbitration [citations].'” (Market Ins. Corp. v. Integrity Ins. Co. (1987) 188 Cal. App. 3d 1095, 1098, internal citations omitted.) “[W]hen a petition to compel arbitration is filed and accompanied by prima facie evidence of a written agreement to arbitrate the controversy, th...
2018.8.9 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 956
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2018.8.9
Excerpt: ...been issued, this is unnecessary. Jack filed this motion twice, once on June 14, 2018, in an attempt to have it heard ex parte, which the court ordered off calendar, and a second time on July 2, 2018, after the court instructed defendant that he must file a noticed motion.2 Since the supporting declarations filed with each motion are slightly different as to some crucial details, they are both considered in analyzing defendant's request to set as...
2018.8.9 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment 475
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2018.8.9
Excerpt: ...within 10 days of service of the minute order plus 5 days for service via mail. (CCP § 1013) Explanation: Background On February 10, 2017, Plaintiff filed a judicial form Complaint alleging a cause of action for motor vehicle negligence and a cause of action for general negligence arising from a multi‐vehicle collision that took place on April 2, 2016 on Interstate 70 near Spiceland, Indiana. Plaintiff alleges that its truck was “rear‐ end...
2018.8.9 Motion to Consolidate 900
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2018.8.9
Excerpt: ...r the Federal Employers Liability Act. He claims that on March 15, 2015, he suffered neck and lower back injuries when he was struck on the right side of the head by an object that entered through an open window while he was operating a locomotive owned by the Defendant Union Pacific. He alleges that the air conditioner was broken and the windows were open for cooling purposes. At the time, he was working as a locomotive engineer on UP644 at Defe...
2018.8.9 Motion for Writ of Possession 031
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2018.8.9
Excerpt: ... a writ of possession concerning personal property identified as a “Vatech PAX‐I 3D Green 15X15, Mfg. #30P15X15, Master Serial Number 055‐0991” which is valued at $32,100. Plaintiff contends that the equipment was delivered to 5151 N. Palm Ave. Suite 320, in Fresno, CA, pursuant to an Equipment Finance Agreement and that the Defendants are in default of the Agreement by failing to make monthly payments. Whether a writ of possession is to ...
2018.8.9 Motion for Summary Adjudication 629
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2018.8.9
Excerpt: ...ant to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it is more likely than not that there is no triable issue of material fact. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) In determining whether any triable issues of material fact exist, the court must strictly construe the moving papers and liberally construe the declarations of the party opposing summary judgment. Any doubts as to whether a triable issue of material fact exist...
2018.8.9 Anti-SLAPP Motion 499
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2018.8.9
Excerpt: ...ree speech rights and/or right to petition. (Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 658.) The defendant must establish that the “core injury‐producing conduct upon which the plaintiff's claim is premised” is protected speech. (Hylton v. Frank E. Rogozienski, Inc. (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 2364, 1272.) The meaning of “arising from” in Code of Civil Procedure, section 425.16, subdivision (b)(1...
2018.8.8 Motion to Strike 469
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2018.8.8
Excerpt: ...ring the 45‐ day leave to amend period. The time in which the answer can be amended will run from service by the clerk of the minute order. Explanation: Defendant Golden, a corporation, filed its Answer to the Complaint in pro per. The answer was signed by Golden's CFO. A corporation cannot represent itself in court either pro per or through an officer or agent who is not an attorney. (Caressa Camille, Inc. v. Alcohol Beverage Control Appeals B...
2018.8.8 Motion to Compel Responses, Request for Sanctions 162
Location: Fresno
Judge: Gaab, Kimberly
Hearing Date: 2018.8.8
Excerpt: ...t One, and Request for Production of Documents, Set One, without objection, and shall produce all documents responsive to the requests for production. All objections are waived. To impose monetary sanctions in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $767.00 against Voua Yang and Cindy Mai Xiong (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2023.010(d), 2023.030(a)), to be paid within 30 days of service of the order by the clerk. To order plaintiffs to pay filing fees of $1...
2018.8.8 Motion for Attorney's Fees 578
Location: Fresno
Judge: Black, Donald
Hearing Date: 2018.8.8
Excerpt: ... order. Explanation: A prevailing buyer in an action under the Song–Beverly Consumer Warranty Act “shall be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of costs and expenses, including attorney's fees based on actual time expended, determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” (Civ. Code, § 1794, ...
2018.8.8 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 175
Location: Fresno
Judge: Hamilton, Jeff
Hearing Date: 2018.8.8
Excerpt: ...irst amended complaint, without leave to amend, for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10, subd. (e).) To grant defendant First American's motion to strike the references to malice, fraud, and oppression, and the requests for punitive damages and attorney's fees against it in the first amended complaint, as improper and unsupported. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 435, 436.) To deny leave to amend. To...

3489 Results

Per page

Pages