Excerpt: ...oot. Explanation: SUMMARY JUDGMENT Evidentiary Objections The court finds plaintiff's objection to Pappas Declaration paragraph 3, and Exhibit A attached thereto, moot in light of plaintiff's submission of the same evidence in her opposition. The court overrules plaintiff's remaining objections to the Pappas Declaration. Merits A trial court shall grant summary judgment where there are no triable issues of material fact and the moving party is e...

Excerpt: ...surprise, mistake or excusable neglect under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b).3 Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) provides, in pertinent part: The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Application for t...

Excerpt: ... will be entertained on Tuesday, February 20, 2024, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 403. Tentative Ruling: To grant plainti
¯'s motion to compel testimony from person most knowledgeable for defendant Fresno Surgery Center. To grant plainti
¯'s motion to compel further responses to request for production of documents served with deposition notices. Defendant shall make its persons most knowledgeable available for the next noticed deposition dates, an...

Excerpt: ...ent consistent with the court's summary judgment order. Explanation: The Material Undisputed Facts Plainti
¯s are Robert Solorio, Ana Solorio, Cirenia Lozono and Ian Solorio, a minor, through his guardian ad litem (collectively "Plainti
¯s"). This case arises from a tragic collision (the "Collision") between a train and Plainti
¯s' passenger vehicle (the "Vehicle"), which resulted in "catastrophic and, ultimately, fatal injuries” to Decedent...

Excerpt: ...rules all of plainti
¯'s objections to the Hamilton Declaration, all of plainti
¯'s objections to the Wijnen Declaration, plainti
¯'s one objection to the Le
¯al Declaration, and the objection to paragraph 3 of the Bryan Declaration. The court sustains plainti
¯'s hearsay objection to paragraph 4 of the Bryan Declaration. The court overrules defendant's objections numbers 1, 3, 4, 6, and 7. The court sustains defendant's objections numbers 2...

Excerpt: ...ught before the same judge that made the order; (2) made within 10 days after ser vice upon the party of notice of the entry of the order; (3) based on new or di
¯erent facts, circumstances, or law; and (4) made and decided before entry of judgment. Code of Civil Procedure section1008 is jurisdictional. (Gilberd v. AC Transit (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1494, 1499.) A party requesting the court reconsider its prior orders must provide new evidence and...

Excerpt: ...awal is not yet e
¯ective, as counsel have not Þled proof of service of the Order Granting Attorney's Motion to be Relieved as Counsel. According to the order at paragraph 5, the “[attorney] is relieved as counsel of record for client e
¯ective upon the Þling of the proof of service of this signed order upon the client.” No such proof of service has been Þled. Plainti
¯ Þled this is action to recover on a $500,000 Loan Agreement and Pr...

Excerpt: ...ted 30 days' leave to Þle the Þrst amended complaint. The time in which the complaint can be amended will run from service by the clerk of the minute order. New allegations/language in the Þrst amended complaint are to be set in boldface type. To Þnd moot defendant's motion to strike the prayer for punitive damages in light of the ruling sustaining the demurrer to all causes of action. Explanation: In California, a complaint shall contain a s...

Excerpt: ...hich the complaint may be amended will run from service of the order by the clerk. All new allegations shall be in boldface type. Oral argument shall be heard on Wednesday, March 20, 2024 at 3:30 p.m. in Department 503. Explanation: A party may Þle a general demurrer on claims that “[t]he pleading does not state facts su
¯icient to constitute a cause of action.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e); Estate of Moss (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 5...

Excerpt: ...demurrer is to test the su
¯iciency of a plainti
¯'s pleading by raising questions of law. (Plumlee v. Poag (1984) 150 Cal.App.3d 541, 545.) The test is whether plainti
¯ has succeeded in stating a cause of action; the court does not concern itself with the issue of plainti
¯'s possible di
¯iculty or inability in proving the allegations of the complaint. (Highlanders, Inc. v. Olsan (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 690, 697.) In assessing the su
¯icienc...

Excerpt: ...cument included in defendant's request for judicial notice. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).) Explanation: Defendant moves to set aside his default on the ground of inadvertence, surprise, mistake, and excusable neglect under Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, subdivision (b). The trial court has broad discretion to vacate the judgment and/or the clerk's entry of default that preceded it. However, that discretion can be exercised only if the mo...

Excerpt: ... s er v i c e o f th i s o rd e r. A ll n ew all egati o n s s h a ll b e i n b o l d face. E x p l an ati o n : C ross - defendant Mutari demurs to the Þrst cross-claim for breach of contract on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action against it, as Mutari was not a party to the purchase agreement that forms the basis for the cause of action. Mutari points out that the cross-complaint only alleges a purchase agreement to buy the sub...

Excerpt: ...e court does not concern itself with the issue of plainti
¯'s p o s s i b l e d i
¯iculty or inability in proving the allegations of their complaint. (Gruenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co. (1973) 9 Cal.3d 566, 572; Highlanders, Inc. v. Olsan (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 690, 697.) The complaint is liberally construed (Rodas v. Spiegel (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 513, 517; Code Civ. Proc., § 452), which “means that the reviewing court draws inferences favorable to t...

Excerpt: ...posed judgment consistent with this ruling. To direct defendant Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. to remit $500 in Þling fees for the consideration of the summary judgment motion. Explanation: Defendants Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“Volkswagen”) and Michael Cadillac, Inc. (“Michael Cadillac”) move for summary judgment of the Complaint Þled by plainti
¯ Hubert Williams (“Plainti
¯”). The Complaint states 5 causes of action: ...

Excerpt: ...in which the amended pleading must be Þled will run from service of the order by the clerk. Explanation: In this action, FTA seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to the e
¯ect that under the Bylaws of Joint Health Management Board (“JHMB”) an annual election must be held among the Union Directors for the Union-designated Chairperson/Co-Chairperson and their alternates using the weighted voting procedure described in the JHMB Bylaws. The ...

Excerpt: ... Sixth, and Seventh Causes of Action Tentative Ruling: To sustain the demurrers to the entire Third Amended Complaint, with leave to amend. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (f).) To take judicial notice of each document included in defendants' requests for judicial notice. (Evid. Code, § 452, subds. (c), (d).) Explanation: Defendant Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center dba Community Regional Medical Center (“CRMC”) generally and sp...

Excerpt: ...y name; when the defendant's true name is discovered, plainti
¯ must amend their pleading accordingly. (Code Civ. Proc. §474.) The court may strike out any irrelevant, false or improper matter inserted in any pleading; or strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or Þled in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule or an order of the court. (Code Civ. Proc. §436(a) and (b).) In the case at bench, Defendants move to strik...

Excerpt: ...nal request and response, the request as amended following meet and confer, and any amended response, in addition to the moving party's statement of the factual and legal reasons for compelling a further response and an opposing response thereto. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1345, subd. (c).) The Joint Separate Statement shall be Þled at least ten court days before the continued hearing. Explanation: A motion to compel a further response to dema...

Excerpt: ...t in the total amount o $1,875. Monetary sanctions are ordered to be paid within 30 calendar days rom the date o service o the minute order by the clerk. Explanation: On January 3, 2024, this motion was continued when the parties Þled a joint statement indicating that the they had agreed to schedule the deposition or on or beore January 31, 2024. The court has not received an update rom the parties and the matter was not taken o
¯ calend...

Excerpt: ...Sanctions: First, plainti
¯'s motion is defective, since plainti
¯ never Þled or served a notice of motion as required by California Rules of Court, rules 3.1110 and 3.1112. “A notice of motion must state in the opening paragraph the nature of the order being sought and the grounds for issuance of the order.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1110(a). The motion must also identify the party or parties bringing the motion; name the parties to wh...

Excerpt: ...ourt may make any order that justice requires to protect any party or other person from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden and expense. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.060, subd. (b).) This motion is brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.060. Accordingly, the Superior Court of Fresno County, Local Rules, rule 2.1.17 applies. The relevant provision of Local Rule 2.1.17 provides as follows “…no motion...

Excerpt: ...l dollar amounts Þlled in (actual costs awarded as well as enhancement payments), within 5 days of the clerk's service of this order. To set a hearing on December 4, 2024 at 3:30 p.m. in Department 502 as a hearing date for an Amended Judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 384. A veriÞed report of payouts of settlement funds and a proposed amended judgment shall be submitted no later than November 18, 2024. Explanation: “Before ...

Excerpt: ...�Defendant”) demurs to the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on the grounds that the second cause of action, for breach arising from a special relationship that it fails to state su
¯icient facts to state a cause of action against Defendant, and that it is uncertain. On a demurrer a court's function is limited to testing the legal su
¯iciency of the complaint. A demurrer is simply not the appropriate procedure for determining the truth of ...

Excerpt: ...ll run from service by the clerk of the minute order. New allegations/language must be set in boldface type. Explanation: The function of a demurrer is to test the su
¯iciency of a plainti
¯'s pleading by raising questions of law. (Plumlee v. Poag (1984) 150 Cal.App.3d 541, 545.) The test is whether plainti
¯ has succeeded in stating a cause of action; the court does not concern itself with the issue of plainti
¯'s p o ss i b l e d i
¯iculty...

Excerpt: ...nitive damages, and the allegations at Item 14a “(2) punitive damages,” and “(2) in the amount of: $3,000,000.00.” (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 425.13, 425.10.) The striking of the punitive damages allegations is without prejudice to plainti
¯s Þling a motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.13, subdivision (a). Explanation: Plainti
¯s' Second, Third, and Fourth Amended Complaints Code of Civil Procedure section 472, subdivision (a)...