Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

697 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: San Mateo x
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 242)) AND term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND term_taxonomy_id = 518)) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 450,25
Array
(
)
2021.02.09 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 492
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2021.02.09
Excerpt: ...c. (“Sedgwick”) and Plaintiff‐in‐Intervention Guadalupe Campillo‐Cortes (“Campillo”) are DENIED. Sedgwick's request for joinder is GRANTED. A. The Peculiar Risk Doctrine Applies Only to Hazardous Activities Under the peculiar risk doctrine, a property owner who hires an independent contractor to do “inherently dangerous work” can be held directly liable for damages when that independent contractor causes injury to others by negl...
2021.02.09 Demurrer 745
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2021.02.09
Excerpt: ...er, the Court construes the complaint's allegations liberally with a view to attaining substantial justice among the parties. Code of Civil Procedure section 452. All material facts are treated as true. Apple v. Superior Court (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 222, 240. The Demurrer to the First Cause of Action for Fraud is OVERRULED. Defendants challenge the specificity of the allegations, that there are no actionable allegations, and no damages pled. The C...
2021.02.02 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 297
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2021.02.02
Excerpt: ...or Summary Judgment or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication, is ruled on as follows: (1) As a threshold matter, Defendants' Notice of Motion indicate that this Motion is brought to the First, Second, Third, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Causes of Action (“COA”) based on Plaintiff's failure to produce admissible evidence in support of these COA. (See Defendants' Notice of Motion, Issues 1‐3, and 5‐7.) A defendant moving for summary judgment...
2021.01.26 Motion for Summary Judgment 195
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2021.01.26
Excerpt: ...tively, Summary Adjudication, to the Complaint of Plaintiffs Sherlene and Lawrence Wong is ruled on as follows: Stillwater has brought this motion for summary judgment on two grounds: (1) that there was no direct physical loss to property as described in Coverage C of the policy; and (2) any loss was not covered by one of the sixteen perils covered under the policy. Defendants then claim that the other causes of action fail because they depend on...
2021.01.12 Motion for Mandatory Venue Transfer 171
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2021.01.12
Excerpt: ...(See Code of Civ. Proc. § 395.5.) “In tort, ‘liability arises where the injury occurs….'” (Mission Imports, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. (Monterey Bay Co., Inc.) (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929.) Injury refers to a wrongful invasion of rights. (Black Diamond Asphalt, Inc. v. Sup. Ct. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 166, 172.) The burden is on Defendant to overcome the presumption that the venue selected by Plaintiffs Yolanda S. Recania and Vernon Recania (“Plaint...
2021.01.12 Demurrer 007
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2021.01.12
Excerpt: ...oc. § 430.10(e). On 9‐11‐20, the Court granted Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (MJOP) with leave to amend, directed to the original Complaint's asserted causes of action for (1) actual fraudulent transfer, (2) constructive fraudulent transfer, (3) common law fraudulent transfer, (4) declaratory relief, and (5) accounting. Plaintiff thereafter filed the FAC, reasserting the same first four causes of action, but dropping the a...
2020.12.22 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 902
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.22
Excerpt: .... Plaintiff's opposition is long on argument, but does not indicate what specific allegations in the SAC describe extrinsic fraud, and the Court has not located any. The allegations of wrongdoing describe, at most, intrinsic fraud. It is Plaintiff's burden to offer a showing that he can amend his pleading to state a cause of action. Plaintiff's Opposition makes no showing of possible amendment. The motion is DENIED as to the third through sixth c...
2020.12.22 Demurrer 758
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.22
Excerpt: ... Fraudulent Transfer based on failure to allege facts sufficient to support this claim against it. Defendant asserts that the allegations show it was not a transferor or transferee of any alleged fraudulent transfer, and therefore cannot be liable for conspiracy to commit fraudulent transfer. Defendant argues that the controlling authority here is Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 503 (“Applied Equipment”). ...
2020.12.21 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 161
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.21
Excerpt: ...ion for breach of contract, the motion is DENIED. As with a demurrer, a motion for judgment on the pleadings “does not lie to a part of a cause of action.” Grieves v. Superior Court (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 159, 163. Here, Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action alleges multiple breaches of the 2017 Operating Agreement, not all of which appear to hinge on the parties' dispute regarding LLC ownership percentages. Complaint, ¶¶82‐92. The Second Cau...
2020.12.18 Motion to Vacate Dismissal 784
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.18
Excerpt: ...,000 in American Express Company. Plaintiff American Express National Bank's unopposed “Motion for Order Vacating Dismissal and Entering Judgment against Defendant,” filed 10‐2‐ 20, is GRANTED. Code Civ. Proc. § 664.6. Per the parties' “Stipulation for Conditional Entry of Judgment” filed 10‐22‐18 (signed 10‐19‐ 18), the parties settled their dispute and Defendants agreed to make a series of payments to Plaintiff per a paymen...
2020.12.18 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 440
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.18
Excerpt: ...Cal.App.3d 703, 710. Where discovery is required to oppose a jurisdictional challenge, a defendant may conduct that discovery without being considered to make a general appearance in the action. Factor Health Management, LLC v. Superior Court (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 246. Specially Appearing Defendant may therefore participate in jurisdictional discovery without waiving their jurisdictional arguments. Plaintiff is authorized to conduct jurisdiction...
2020.12.17 Motion for Summary Adjudication 345
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.17
Excerpt: ...se of Action for Declaratory Relief, is GRANTED, for the reasons stated below. Both the Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action hinge the same question—namely, given the parties' 2013 settlement agreement, the resolution of the parties' prior lawsuit (Case No. CIV522693), and Defendants Fair et. al.'s recent payment to Plaintiffs J.B.B. et. al. of $475,424.12 to satisfy the Judgment in CIV522693, are Plaintiffs J.B.B. et. al. still investors in/equity...
2020.12.04 Motion for Summary Adjudication 403
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.04
Excerpt: ... are objecting to the remainder of the sentence. If they are, the objection is OVERRULED. Objection 2: SUSTAIN as to the bolded language “I presumed based on what I saw that he had crashed into us because he talking (sic) on his cell phone and not paying attention to the road on the basis of speculation. OVERULED as to the rest of the objection. Objection 3: SUSTAIN as to Plaintiffs' Exhibit N on the basis of hearsay, lack of foundation, lack o...
2020.12.02 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 719
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.02
Excerpt: ... take judicial notice of its own records. 3) DENIED as to the printout from the Oregon Secretary of State for an LLC named “Oregon Drying Technologies”, generated on 10/2/20. (Kirpes Decl., Exh. A) Although judicial notice may be taken of a certificate of corporate status under Ev. Code, §452(c) (See, Friends of Shingle Springs Interchange v. County of El Dorado (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1470, 1483), the printout is not a certificate of corpora...
2020.12.02 Motion to Quash for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 321
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.02
Excerpt: ...orum. According to Defendants, this Court lacks specific personal jurisdiction because “Robison and his sole proprietorships are in North Carolina, there is no dispute. Plaintiffs arranged for product to be shipped there — and this litigation arose out of a dispute about that delivery.” MPA, p.6. Defendants, however, fail to acknowledge that Defendants, as well as Plaintiffs, were parties to an agreement to ship flooring product to North Ca...
2020.12.02 Demurrer 261
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.02
Excerpt: ...e attorney to use such skill, prudence and diligence as members of his or her profession commonly possess and exercise; (2) a breach of that duty; (3) a proximate causal connection between the breach and the resulting injury; and (4) actual loss or damage resulting from the attorney's negligence." (Coscia v. McKenna & Cuneo (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1194, 1199.) Defendant asserts that the allegations are insufficient to support that she breached the duty...
2020.12.01 Motion to Strike 362
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.01
Excerpt: ... contend, first, that the allegations set forth at ¶¶ 40‐49 of the Hogans' Third Amended Cross‐Complaint, relating to the third cause of action for violation of Bus. & Prof. Code § 7031 asserted against Defendant JPM, must be stricken because the Hogans failed to seek leave to amend this cause of action. According to Defendants, “the Court's ruling granting the Hogans leave to correct the problems with [the Hogan's former fifth cause of ...
2020.12.01 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 320
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.01
Excerpt: ...Proc. § 437c, subd. (c).) “Summary judgment is proper only if it disposes of the entire lawsuit.” (All Towing Servs. LLC v. City of Orange (2013) 220 Cal. App. 4th 946, 954.) The present motion addresses only the counts for open book account and account stated; the motion fails to address the claims for Goods sold and delivered (Complaint ¶ CC‐1(b)(3)) and credit extended (i.e., money paid at Defendant's request) (Id. ¶ CC‐1(b)(6)). Si...
2020.12.01 Demurrer 540
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.12.01
Excerpt: ...e is GRANTED pursuant to Evidence Code § 452(d). Cross‐Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED pursuant to Evidence Code § 452(d). Judicial notice is taken of the documents' filing/recording, contents, and legal effect, but not the truth of allegations therein. Williams v. Wraxall (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 120, 130, n. 7. Cross‐Complainants have standing to sue under the lease. The Lease and Guarantees relate to the same matters, are...
2020.11.30 Motion to Quash 374
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.11.30
Excerpt: ...of the tenancy. In support, Defendants cite to Delta Imports, Inc. v. Municipal Court (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 1033, 1036 (“Delta Imports”), which held that a motion to quash service of summons is the only method to challenge whether a complaint states a cause of action for unlawful detainer supporting a five‐day summons. However, Borsuk v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 607, 611‐ 617 (“Borsuk”), disagree...
2020.11.24 Motion for Attorney's Fees 637
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.11.24
Excerpt: ...is a breach of contract case involving Defendant's breach of the parties' “2015‐2016 Statement of Financial Responsibility.” See 4‐9‐18 First Amended Complaint, Ex. A; 10‐22‐20 Howard Decl., Ex. 3. The agreement contains an attorney's fees clause which provides that the prevailing party in an action to enforce the contract is entitled to recover attorney's fees and court costs. Id. at ¶7 (“Additional Terms of Agreement”). Plain...
2020.11.24 Demurrer 149
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.11.24
Excerpt: ... action for intentional interference with prospective economic relations is SUSTAINED with leave to amend on the ground that the Complaint does not sufficiently allege an independent wrongful act. “An act is not independently wrongful merely because defendant acted with an improper motive. … [A]n act is independently wrongful if it is unlawful, that is, if it is proscribed by some constitutional, statutory, regulatory, common law, or other de...
2020.11.23 Demurrer 078
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.11.23
Excerpt: ...eo that there were only two legal rentable units on the property. Id., ¶ 30‐34. At the time Plaintiffs purchased the property, they believed there were three legal and permitted rental units on the property. Following their discovery in 2018, Plaintiffs commenced this suit against their agent, the sellers, and the listing agent. The moving Defendants (“Listing Broker”) demur to Plaintiffs' second, third, fourth, and fifth causes of action ...
2020.11.20 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 643
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.11.20
Excerpt: ...sider and weigh the Tech‐Bilt factors … when no one objects, the barebones motion which sets forth the ground of good faith, accompanied by a declaration which sets forth a brief background of the case is sufficient.” City of Grand Terrace v. Superior Court (1987) 192 Cal.App.3d 1251, 1261. While Defendant Duff's motion is bare bones, it does provide sufficient information for the Court to conclude that the settlement is in good faith. Liab...
2020.11.20 Demurrer 916
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2020.11.20
Excerpt: ...ocedure section 1005(b), which requires opposing papers to be filed and served at least nine court days before the hearing. November 11, 2020, Veteran's Day, was a legal holiday. However, despite this delay, Defendants timely filed and served their Reply. Therefore, the Court exercises its discretion to still consider Plaintiffs' Opposition, but reminds Plaintiffs in the future to timely file and serve their papers or else they may not be conside...

697 Results

Per page

Pages