Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

408 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Shasta x
Judge: Wood, Tamara L x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 246)) AND term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND term_taxonomy_id = 408)) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 150,25
Array
(
)
2022.06.13 Motions to Compel Responses 578
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.06.13
Excerpt: ...efendant Team RV Management, LLC to Serve Responses Request for Production of Documents, Set One. Defendant Team RV Management, LLC filed a joint Opposition in which all three motions were addressed. The Reply also addresses all three motions. Due to the manner of the briefing, the Court is issuing one tentative ruling that will address all three motions. Request for Continuance. In the Opposition, Defendant requested that the three motions to co...
2022.06.13 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 322
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.06.13
Excerpt: ...briefing. The proposed class is defined “As all non‐exempt hourly employees of Frozen Gourmet, Inc. who performed work in California at any time during the period of October 6, 2017 through October 1, 2021. The PAGA period is September 23, 2020, through the date of settlement approval or judgment. The proposed class members are approximately 25 former and current employees of Defendant. The proposed settlement is: Total Settlement Amount $180...
2022.05.31 Motion to Set Aside Default 788
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.05.31
Excerpt: ... he or she may serve and file a notice of motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action. The notice of motion shall be served and filed within a reasonable time, but in no event exceeding the earlier of: (i) two years after entry of a default judgment against him or her; or (ii) 180 days after service on him or her of a written notice that the default or default judgment has been entered. (b) A notice of m...
2022.05.23 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 322
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.05.23
Excerpt: ...ormed work in California at any time during the period of October 6, 2017 through October 1, 2021. The PAGA period is September 23, 2020, through the date of settlement approval or judgment. The proposed class members are approximately 25 former and current employees of Defendant. The proposed settlement is: Total Settlement Amount $180,000.00 Proposed Attorneys' Fees (up to 35%) ‐$63,000.00 Litigation Costs and Expenses (up to) ‐$12,000.00 S...
2022.05.23 Motion for Default Judgment 822
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.05.23
Excerpt: ...Safety Code § 11470. The judicial and/or administrative procedure for forfeiture is laid out generally in Health and Safety Code §§ 11488.4 and 11488.5. For a judicial forfeiture the District Attorney's Office (or other agency) is required to file a Petition for Forfeiture. Health and Safety Code § 11488.4(a). The Petition for Forfeiture must be served on the individuals from whom the property was seized. Health and Safety Code § 11488.5(c)....
2022.05.09 Motion to Compel Further Responses 596
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.05.09
Excerpt: ...ays prior to the hearing as required by CCP § 1005(b). Plaintiffs filed a substantive Reply on April 6, 2022. The Court continued the hearing due to insufficient time for the Court to review the Opposition and Reply, but did not make any findings regarding the late filing. After reviewing both the Opposition and Reply, the Court should consider finding that the Opposition was filed late due to excusable neglect and inadvertent mistake and that P...
2022.05.02 Motion to Compel Further Responses 596
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.05.02
Excerpt: ...ays prior to the hearing as required by CCP § 1005(b). Plaintiffs filed a substantive Reply on April 6, 2022. The Court continued the hearing due to insufficient time for the Court to review the Opposition and Reply, but did not make any findings regarding the late filing. After reviewing both the Opposition and Reply, the Court should consider finding that the Opposition was filed late due to excusable neglect and inadvertent mistake and that P...
2022.04.25 Demurrer 973
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.04.25
Excerpt: ...0(e). A demurrer can be used to challenge defects that appear on the face of the complaint or from matters that may be subject to judicial notice. Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal. 3d 311, 318. The court “treat[s] the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law.” Hood v. Hacienda La Puente Unified School District (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 435, 438. No matter how unlikely, a...
2022.02.22 Motion to Strike 338
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.02.22
Excerpt: ...efforts. Merits. The court may, upon a motion made pursuant to Section 435, or at any time in its discretion, and upon terms it deems proper: 2 (a) Strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading. (b) Strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP § 436 A motion to strike can be used to attack the entire pleading, o...
2022.02.22 Motion for Attorney Fees 372
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.02.22
Excerpt: ... seven causes of action. The anti‐SLAPP was originally scheduled to be heard on August 30, 2021, however the hearing was continued at the request of Plaintiff and the anti‐SLAPP was eventually heard on October 4, 2021. The Court took the matter under submission and granted the anti‐SLAPP on November 22, 2021 in all aspects except one cause of action as to Defendant Mark Lucas. In the ruling on the anti‐SLAPP, the Court determined that Def...
2022.02.14 Motion for Default Judgment 990
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.02.14
Excerpt: ...e § 11470. The judicial and/or administrative procedure for forfeiture is laid out generally in Health and Safety Code §§ 11488.4 and 11488.5. For a judicial forfeiture the District Attorney's Office (or other agency) is required to file a Petition for Forfeiture. Health and Safety Code § 11488.4(a). The Petition for Forfeiture must be served on the individuals from whom the property was seized. Health and Safety Code § 11488.5(c). This serv...
2022.02.14 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 974
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.02.14
Excerpt: ...Civil Procedure] section 877.6 require that a number of factors be taken into account” when evaluating whether a settlement between a plaintiff and joint tortfeasor is in good faith, including (1) a rough approximation of plaintiffs' total recovery and the settlor's 3 proportionate liability; (2) the settlement amount, (3) allocation of the settlement proceeds among multiple plaintiffs, if applicable; (4) recognition that a settlor should pay l...
2022.02.14 OSC Re Sanctions 534
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.02.14
Excerpt: ...ttlement check has not been cashed due to a need for a signature from the Guardian Ad Litem. No response to the OSC was received, nor was a response received for the prior OSC issued in the amount of $250.00 on October 19, 2021. Although an attorney hired by the Guardian Ad Litem has the primary responsibility for pursuing the minor's claim, hiring the attorney does not relieve the guardian of all responsibility for pursuing the claim. Brandon G....
2022.02.07 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 960
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.02.07
Excerpt: ...claration of Tristan P. Espinosa provides sufficient evidence of Plaintiff's meet and confer efforts. Request for Judicial Notice. Plaintiff requests the Court take judicial notice of the Answer filed by Defendants, Plaintiff's Motion to Deem Admissions, and the Court's ruling and Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Deem Admissions. Plaintiff provided a copy of each. Pursuant to Evid. Code §§ 452(d) and 453, the Court grants the request. Merit...
2022.01.31 Motion for Monetary Sanctions 133
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.01.31
Excerpt: ... a ruling made in California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection v. Eunice E. Howell, et al. Defendant did not object to the request and the ruling is a record of a court. The Court will take judicial notice pursuant to Evid. Code §§ 452(d) and 453. Meet and Confer Efforts. Both parties have provided substantial evidence regarding meet and confer efforts. The Court finds that the meet and confer efforts were sufficient. Merits of the Mot...
2022.01.10 Motion to Strike or Tax Costs 346
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.01.10
Excerpt: ... were not necessary. Ibid. If the items appear to be proper charges, the verified memorandum of costs is prima facie evidence that the items were reasonably incurred. Oak Grove School Dist. v. City Title Ins. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698. Conclusory and unsubstantiated objections to a cost are insufficient to rebut the presumption that they were reasonably and necessarily incurred. Ladas v. California State Auto. Ass'n (1993) 19 Cal. App. 4...
2022.01.10 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 492
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.01.10
Excerpt: ...against the plaintiff, such party may not thereafter in any other action assert against the plaintiff the related cause of action not pleaded.” “Related cause of action” is defined as “a cause of action which arises out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences as the cause of action which the plaintiff alleges in his complaint.” CCP § 426.10(c). Causes of action are related if there is a logical rel...
2022.01.10 Demurrer 110
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2022.01.10
Excerpt: ... for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. If an amended complaint, cross‐complaint, or answer is filed, the responding party shall meet and confer again with the party who filed the amended pleading before filing a demurrer to the amended pleading. (1) As part of the meet and confer process, the demurring party shall identify all of the specific causes of ...
2021.12.20 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 670
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2021.12.20
Excerpt: ...ding Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement was filed on November 19, 2021 along with supporting declarations. The motion is unopposed. Final Approval of the Settlement: The parties have agreed to settle the case for $575,000.00. The breakdown of the settlement is: Total Settlement Amount $575,000.00 Proposed Attorneys' Fees (33 1/3%) $191,666.67 Litigation Costs and Expenses $21,239.57 Settlement Administration Costs $6,500.00 PAGA...
2021.12.06 Motion to Strike Costs 680
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2021.12.06
Excerpt: ...opment Group Holdings, LLC (“DGH”) did not file a Memorandum of Costs. Timing. The Lockwoods and DGI each filed a Memorandum of Costs on October 18, 2021 and both were personally served on the Eatmons' counsel, Douglas Wright, on the same date. “Any notice of motion to strike or to tax costs must be served and filed 15 days after service of the cost memorandum.” CRC 3.1700(b)(1). The Eatmons timely filed their Motion to Strike Memorandum ...
2021.11.22 Motion to Strike or Tax Costs 980
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2021.11.22
Excerpt: ...Item No. 1 (filing and motion fees) $809.00  Item No. 5 (service of process) $80.00  Item No. 16 (other) $373.00 2 Merits of Motion: The Song‐Beverly Act; specifically, Civil Code Section 1794(d) states “If the buyer prevails…the buyer hall be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of costs and expenses…determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the buyer in conne...
2021.11.15 Motion for Default Judgment 984
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2021.11.15
Excerpt: ...th and Safety Code § 11470. The judicial and/or administrative procedure for forfeiture is laid out generally in Health and Safety Code §§ 11488.4 and 11488.5. For a judicial forfeiture the District Attorney's Office (or other agency) is required to file a Petition for Forfeiture. Health and Safety Code § 11488.4(a). The Petition for Forfeiture must be served on the individuals from whom the property was seized. Health and Safety Code § 1148...
2021.10.25 Motion for Attorney Fees 980
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2021.10.25
Excerpt: ...torney's fees. Civ. Code § 1794(d). The attorney's fee award is limited to the amount the court determines was reasonably incurred by the buyer in commencing and prosecuting the action, based on actual time expended. The prevailing buyer has the burden of proving the fees were both reasonably necessary to conduct the litigation and reasonable in amount. Civil Code § 1794(d); Robertson v. Fleetwood Travel Trailers of California, Inc., (2006) 144...
2021.10.18 Motion to Vacate Dismissal 228
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2021.10.18
Excerpt: ...ertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” CCP § 473(b). Application “shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the … dismissal.” CCP § 473(b). A moving party must show diligence. Kendall. Barker (1988) 197 Cal. App. 3d 619, 625. What is a reasonable time in any case depends upon the circumstances of that particular case and there must be some showing, some evidence, as the basis for the exercise of t...
2021.10.12 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 682
Location: Shasta
Judge: Wood, Tamara L
Hearing Date: 2021.10.12
Excerpt: ...s the proxy or agent of state labor law enforcement agencies, representing the same legal right and interest as those agencies, in a proceeding that is designed to protect the public, not to benefit private parties. Villacres v. ABM Industries Inc. (2010) 189 Cal. App. 4th 562. The purpose of PAGA is not to recover damages or restitution, but to create a means of “deputizing” citizens as private attorneys general to enforce the Labor Code; th...

408 Results

Per page

Pages