Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

368 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Shasta x
Judge: Baker, Stephen H x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 246)) AND term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND term_taxonomy_id = 407)) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 325,25
Array
(
)
2019.10.15 Motion to Strike 093
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2019.10.15
Excerpt: ...ction of Emotional Distress; 2. Breach of Contract1 ; 3. Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; 4. Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy; and 5. Intentional or Negligent Misrepresentation. On March 25, 2019, the Third Cause of Action for Breach of Implied Covenant was dismissed. On April 8, 2019, the Court sustained with leave to amend a demurrer as to the remaining four causes of action. The same day the Court gr...
2019.1.28 OSC Re Dismissal 869
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2019.1.28
Excerpt: ... Court. Plaintiff's failure to obtain permission was discovered in early December 2018. On December 14, 2018, the present Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (hereinafter “OSC”) was issued to Plaintiff. The OSC also provided Lakota the notice required by CCP § 391.7(c) informing him he had ten (10) days to obtain leave from the Presiding Judge to pursue the litigation. Plaintiff failed to seek the required leave. The OSC also provided that Pla...
2019.1.28 OSC Re Dismissal 647
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2019.1.28
Excerpt: ...County Superior Court. Plaintiff's failure to obtain permission was discovered in early December 2018. On December 14, 2018, the present Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (hereinafter “OSC”) was issued to Plaintiff. The OSC also provided Lakota the notice required by CCP § 391.7(c) informing him he had ten (10) days to obtain leave from the Presiding Judge to pursue the litigation. Plaintiff failed to seek the required leave. The OSC also pr...
2019.1.28 Motion to Continue Trial Date 373
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2019.1.28
Excerpt: ...he case as a result of which the case is not ready for trial.” CRC 3.1332(c)(7). There are numerous other factors to be considered by the Court including but not limited to the proximity of the trial date, whether there have been other continuances, the length of the continuances, whether any party will suffer prejudice, and the interests of justice. CRC 3.1332(d)(1‐3) & (10). A motion to continue trial must be brought “as soon as reasonabl...
2019.1.28 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 947
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2019.1.28
Excerpt: ...rial. The failure to file earlier must have been in good faith. Id. Leave to file a cross‐complaint must be liberally construed to avoid forfeiture of causes of action. Id. Defendant has established that the failure to file the cross‐ complaint earlier was based on good faith efforts to settle this litigation. This matter is set for trial in October 2019 which will provide Plaintiff ample time to conduct discovery on the cross‐complaint. Fu...
2019.1.28 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 767
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2019.1.28
Excerpt: ... § 435.5(a). A motion to strike must also be supported by a meet and confer declaration. CCP § 435.5(a)(3). No meet and confer declaration was provided with the demurrer and motion to strike. It appears 2 moving party has submitted the Declaration of Damon Booth with its reply in an effort to cure this defect. This declaration indicates nothing more than the fact counsel apparently had a single telephone conversation on November 6, 2018 wherein...
2019.1.28 Claim of Exemption 837
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2019.1.28
Excerpt: ...provided the required “Claim of Exemption” mandatory Judicial Council Form but it fails to identify any code section that would apply. Further, the facts alleged simply state that the proof of service was incomplete and that it was never actually filed or stamped by the clerk's office. It is unclear to which proof of service he is referring. The original complaint was personally served on December 10, 2010 according the proof of service filed...
2018.8.13 Motion to be Relieved as Counsel 305
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.13
Excerpt: ...d as counsel is brought instead of filing a consent under CCP § 284(1). Mr. Cogan has established in general terms that there has been a breakdown in the relationship. The 3 information provided in the declaration is sufficient to establish a need to be relieved provided all procedural requirements have been met. CRC 3.1362(d) specifically requires service of the motion, supporting declaration and proposed order. The proof of service on file ref...
2018.8.13 Motion to Quash Subpoena 815
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.13
Excerpt: ...st 13, 2018 and therefore the opposition was due on July 31, 2018. The opposition was filed on August 7, 2018. The proof of service shows that the opposition was not served until August 7, 2018 and was therefore untimely. Even if the Court were to consider the closure from July 30‐August 3 due to the Carr Fire there is no excuse why the opposition was not timely served on the opposing parties. The Court will exercise its discretion and consider...
2018.8.7 Motion to Contest Application for Good Faith Settlement 952
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.7
Excerpt: ...thority to represent Reed or file a motion on his behalf. On this basis alone, the motion is denied. Counsel should be prepared to address this issue at the hearing of this matter. Out of an abundance of caution, and in order to promote economy and convenience to the parties, the Court issues the following “tentative” tentative ruling indicating how it would rule if Peter Dubrawski properly appeared. Plaintiff, Robert Reed and non‐parties r...
2018.8.7 Demurrer 637
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.7
Excerpt: ...“general demurrers.” A general demurrer lies when the allegations of the complaint show that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch v. Berwald (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 990, 995. Merits of Motion: Plaintiff's form complaint for personal injury alleges two causes of action arising from the same incident. The first cause of action is for “Motor Vehicle” which is a type of negligence cause of action....
2018.8.6 Claim of Exemption 813
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.6
Excerpt: ...at can be withheld is 25% of disposable income). 15 USC § 1673(a). Section 1672(b) of Title 15 of the United States Code defines “disposable earnings” as “that part of the earnings of any individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of any amounts required by law to be withheld.” CCP section 706.011 provides an almost identical definition. Under California law, even more than 75% can be exempt, if the income is sufficient...
2018.8.6 Demurrer 637
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.6
Excerpt: ...“general demurrers.” A general demurrer lies when the allegations of the complaint show that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch v. Berwald (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 990, 995. Merits of Motion: Plaintiff's form complaint for personal injury alleges two causes of action arising from the same incident. The first cause of action is for “Motor Vehicle” which is a type of negligence cause of action....
2018.8.6 Demurrer 795
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.6
Excerpt: ... five calendar days if the notice is served by mail. CCP § 1005(b). The motion was served by mail on July 12, 2018. The last day to serve by mail was actually July 8, 2018. The motion is therefore untimely. Plaintiff has filed an opposition which addresses this procedural defect and which addresses the underlying merits of the demurrer. Opposing a motion on the merits waives any irregularities in the notice. Carlton v. Quint (2000) 77 Cal.App.4t...
2018.8.6 Motion to Contest Application for Good Faith Settlement 952
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.6
Excerpt: ...thority to represent Reed or file a motion on his behalf. On this basis alone, the motion is denied. Counsel should be prepared to address this issue at the hearing of this matter. Out of an abundance of caution, and in order to promote economy and convenience to the parties, the Court issues the following “tentative” tentative ruling indicating how it would rule if Peter Dubrawski properly appeared. Plaintiff, Robert Reed and non‐parties r...
2018.8.3 Motion to Contest Application for Good Faith Settlement 952
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.3
Excerpt: ...thority to represent Reed or file a motion on his behalf. On this basis alone, the motion is denied. Counsel should be prepared to address this issue at the hearing of this matter. Out of an abundance of caution, and in order to promote economy and convenience to the parties, the Court issues the following “tentative” tentative ruling indicating how it would rule if Peter Dubrawski properly appeared. Plaintiff, Robert Reed and non‐parties r...
2018.8.3 Demurrer 637
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.3
Excerpt: ...“general demurrers.” A general demurrer lies when the allegations of the complaint show that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch v. Berwald (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 990, 995. Merits of Motion: Plaintiff's form complaint for personal injury alleges two causes of action arising from the same incident. The first cause of action is for “Motor Vehicle” which is a type of negligence cause of action....
2018.8.3 Claim of Exemption 813
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.8.3
Excerpt: ...that can be withheld is 25% of disposable income). 15 USC § 1673(a). Section 1672(b) of Title 15 of the United States Code defines “disposable earnings” as “that part of the earnings of any individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of any amounts required by law to be withheld.” CCP section 706.011 provides an almost identical definition. Under California law, even more than 75% can be exempt, if the income is sufficie...
2018.7.30 Motion to Contest Application for Good Faith Settlement 952
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.30
Excerpt: ...thority to represent Reed or file a motion on his behalf. On this basis alone, the motion is denied. Counsel should be prepared to address this issue at the hearing of this matter. Out of an abundance of caution, and in order to promote economy and convenience to the parties, the Court issues the following “tentative” tentative ruling indicating how it would rule if Peter Dubrawski properly appeared. Plaintiff, Robert Reed and non‐parties r...
2018.7.30 Demurrer 637
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.30
Excerpt: ...“general demurrers.” A general demurrer lies when the allegations of the complaint show that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch v. Berwald (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 990, 995. Merits of Motion: Plaintiff's form complaint for personal injury alleges two causes of action arising from the same incident. The first cause of action is for “Motor Vehicle” which is a type of negligence cause of action....
2018.7.30 Claim of Exemption 813
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.30
Excerpt: ...that can be withheld is 25% of disposable income). 15 USC § 1673(a). Section 1672(b) of Title 15 of the United States Code defines “disposable earnings” as “that part of the earnings of any individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of any amounts required by law to be withheld.” CCP section 706.011 provides an almost identical definition. Under California law, even more than 75% can be exempt, if the income is sufficie...
2018.7.23 OSC Re Sanctions 701
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.23
Excerpt: ...018 and by Plaintiff on June 28, 2018. Mr. Smith was therefore the attorney of record in this case and remained the attorney for Plaintiff at the time the OSC issued. No response has been provided by either Plaintiff or Mr. Smith. Sanctions are therefore imposed in the amount of $250 against Plaintiff and Mr. Smith. The clerk is directed to prepare a separate Order of Sanctions. ...
2018.7.9 Motion to Transfer and Consolidate 139
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.9
Excerpt: ...resentation, and declaratory relief. Part of their complaint also makes reference to a lawsuit filed by two of the Defendants (Amrit and Ruby Gill) on April 19, 2017 in Orange County (Orange County Superior Court Action No. 30‐2017‐00915449‐CU‐FR‐CJC). The Orange County complaint alleges similar causes of action pertaining to the same transaction, but also includes different causes of action and different parties. It appears both compla...
2018.7.9 Motion for Summary Judgment 525
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.9
Excerpt: ...t. Decker opposes the motion but Plaintiff does not. 4 Objections: Decker's Objection No. 1: SUSTAINED Ginno's Objection No.1: SUSTAINED Ginno's Objection No. 2: SUSTAINED Factual Background: In 2015 Plaintiff was employed by the National Veterinary Associates (“NVA”) as the managing veterinarian at the Westside Pet Hospital (the “Hospital”). NVA leased the Hospital from the Ginno Family Trust. On January 29, 2015, Plaintiff was injured w...
2018.7.9 Demurrer 319
Location: Shasta
Judge: Baker, Stephen H
Hearing Date: 2018.7.9
Excerpt: ...action on the last page of their Memorandum of Points and Authorities appears to be in error as a demurrer on that cause of action was neither noticed nor argued. Standards of Demurrer: A demurrer should be sustained if the complaint fails to “state facts sufficient to constitute a valid cause of action.” CCP § 430.10(e). A demurrer can be used to challenge defects that appear on the fact of the complaint or from matters that may be subject ...

368 Results

Per page

Pages