Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

407 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: San Mateo x
Judge: Greenberg, Susan x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 242)) AND term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND term_taxonomy_id = 393)) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 400,50
Array
(
)
2018.6.27 Demurrer 748
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2018.6.27
Excerpt: ... entirety. The Court finds that these causes of action are sufficiently stated. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties. ...
2018.6.26 Motion to Strike 657
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2018.6.26
Excerpt: ...dum of Points and Authorities a “Matrix of Targeted Allegations and Legal Authorities” that is 24‐pages long identifying the portions it is seeking to strike as well as the legal basis for striking each portion. While Defendant may have intended for this Matrix to be helpful in light of the numerous provisions it is seeking to strike, the court notes that Defendant includes arguments in the Matrix that are not in the Memorandum of Points an...
2018.6.26 Motion for Sanctions 005
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2018.6.26
Excerpt: ...rceable, for failure to comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.320, subdivision (d). Before this motion was filed, Plaintiff never offered this as an explanation for her failure to appear. Regardless, the Minute Order is enforceable under Bittle v. Superior Court (1976) 55 Cal.App.3d 489 and Carpenter v. Superior Court (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 249, 269‐270, both of which Plaintiff relies on. All of the requisites of Section 2032.320(d) ...
2018.6.26 Motion for Order 488
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2018.6.26
Excerpt: ...ted duration of the appeal. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(1), adopted by Local Rule 3.10, effective immediately, and no formal order pursuant to Rule 3.1312 or any other notice is required as the tentative ruling affords sufficient notice to the parties.. ...
2018.6.26 Motion for Order 268
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2018.6.26
Excerpt: ...to allow Plaintiff's counsel time to address the fact that Plaintiff is deceased, either through appointment of a personal representative, a successor‐in‐interest, or otherwise. Code Civ. Proc. § 377.31. Prior to the continued hearing date, either party may file additional documents/evidence with the Court, should they choose to do so. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court, pursuant to Rule 3.1308(a)(...
2018.6.26 Motion for Good Faith Settlement 571
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2018.6.26
Excerpt: ...ff and interested party Irlanda Fuentes‐Perez by Nationwide Legal LLC. However, there is no declaration from the individual at Nationwide Legal as to the actual delivery of the motion. The court also notes that PV Holding Corp. was not served with the motion. Although it has been dismissed by plaintiff, the settling party needs to show that its rights would not be affected by the good faith determination. Indemnity claims by other joint tortfea...
2018.6.26 Demurrer 657
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2018.6.26
Excerpt: ...ourth Causes of Action are barred by the statute of limitations is OVERRULED. The one‐year statute of limitations begins to run “after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the facts constituting the wrongful act or omission….” (C.C.P. sec. 340.6.) Although Plaintiff alleges a number of wrongdoings and/or omissions by Defendant, Plaintiff alleges at least in part that she did not disco...

407 Results

Per page

Pages