Excerpt: ...dow during which Piazza's normally maintained its video footage, Gonzalez argues that litigation was reasonably foreseeable in this instance, and so the failure to preserve the video constituted spoliation of evidence. Although it is a much closer call than either side is willing to admit, the court finds that litigation was reasonably foreseeable before Gonzalez made a formal demand, and that Piazza's was negligent in failing to preserve the vi...

Excerpt: ...ntiff Travel ers Property Casualty Company of America (“Travelers”), requests a total of $60,994.50 in fees and costs, representing the amounts incurred in responding to both appeals and the petition for review. Defendant Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. (“Critchfield”) o pposes the motion on two discrete grounds, discussed below. As a threshold matter, Travelers has submitted a request for judicial notice of various court filings and orde...

Excerpt: ...ve rulings below. I. Background This is a personal injury matter arising out of incidents that occurred during Plaintiff's incarceration. On August 7, 2020, a deputy twisted Plaintiff's wrist over tightened handcuffs, causing injury. (SAC, p. 40; Attachment to Co mplaint, p. 4.)2 On October 3, 2020, another deputy challenged Plaintiff because he refused orders to confront another inmate. (Ibid.) Plaintiff identifies another incident on October 2...

Excerpt: ... stated claims for: (1) Breach of Contract; (2) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; (3) Promissory Estoppel; (4) Fraud; (5) Unfair Business Practice; (6) Unjust Enrichment; (7) Money Paid; (8) Accounting; and (9) Conspiracy. She alleged that defendants Wu, H u, and Li were all the alter egos of We Party. We Party brought a demurrer to Ren's original complaint, as well as a motion to strike the complaint's request for pu...

Excerpt: ...ixteen years old.” (Complaint, ¶¶ 1 -2, 8, 11 -14.) According to the allegations in the Complaint, Plaintiff, who is currently sixty -two years old, was a student at Lynbrook High School (“Lynbrook”) located in Santa Clara County. (Ibid.) The alleged sexual abuse occurred betw een 1976 and 1977. Defendant, a public entity/school district, was an employer of Doe 2, a then 40 -year -old Lynbrook science teacher who molested and sexually abu...

Excerpt: ...al negligence. The FAC al leges Officer Taktejeva engaged in police misconduct on March 19, 2021 when she displayed inaccuracies in her police report in relation to an attack by Tang Jianing (“Jianing”) on Plaintiff.1 Specifically, the FAC alleges: inaccurate reporting regarding Ji aning's account of the attack and weapon utilization; failure to communicate Plaintiff's injury to the on- call judge who issued the emergency protective order; P...

Excerpt: ...in user -in terface (“UI”) designs, via email to provide UI design services for his project, which would later become known as Zoom. The email designated Plaintiff as “UI consultant,” and his job was to provide his professional opinions and make recommendations for im proving the product's UI. Between October 27, 2011, and October 29, 2011, Mr. Yaun and Plaintiff exchanged emails regarding contract terms, eventually entering a Shares -for...

Excerpt: ...r Velador Zuniga are mother and son. Esther Zuniga is the Trustee of the Ester V. Zuniga Revocable Living Trust Dated December 20, 2004 (“Trust”). Defendant Alesia Murrieta is the Successor Trustee under the terms of the Trust and Esther Zuniga's granddaughter. The facts are not disputed. Esther Zuniga and her ex -husband, Plaintiff's father, purchased the Property as their residence in 1972. On July 2, 2003, Plaintiff's father/Esther Zuniga'...

Excerpt: ...Lua. (Complaint, p. 4.) Lua initiated this action on December 3, 2021, asserting claims for negligence and premises liability. On October 4, 2023, Seaside filed the instant motion, which Lua opposes. II. Evidentiary Objections Lua's objections to Seaside's evide nce do not need to be ruled upon because they do not comply with Rule of Court 3.1354. Rule 3.1354 requires two documents to be submitted when evidentiary objections are made: the object...

Excerpt: ... Way in Stanford, County of Santa Clara (“Property”.) The Property is owned by Plaintiff as part of its housing program located in a 450 -acre subdivision and used exclusively to provide subsidized housing for eligible faculty. (FAC ¶¶ 3, 8, 33.) On August 21, 2018, P laintiff entered into a ground lease agreement with the Faculty Lessee for a term of 51 years. Plaintiff reserved a significant ongoing interest in the Property and granted o...

Excerpt: ...operator of the vehicle, was driving a 2017 Lexus RX. (Compl., ¶¶ 3 -4.) Plaintiff did not contribute to the accident. (Compl., ¶ 7.) On October 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed her Complaint alleging a negligence cause of action against Defendant. On January 2, 2024, Defendant filed a demurrer to the Complaint. Plaintiff opposes the motion. II. Demurrer a. Legal Standard “A demurrer tests only the legal sufficiency of the pleading. It admits the...

Excerpt: ...irst Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 21 February 2024. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. --- o ooOooo --- Order On Defendant Aemetis Advanced Fuels Keyes, Inc.'s Demurrer To Plaintiff's Complaint. I. Statement of Facts. Plaintiff Lion Manufacturing (“Lion”) is engaged in the business of c...

Excerpt: ...reholder of a separate entity, Cynthi.io Inc. Google's termination letter —sent only to Mr. Willaims —accuses Plaintiff of conducting work for Cynthi.io using Google's time and resources, including his corporate laptop. Plaintiff vehemently denies very sentence o f the termination letter, referencing both his pre -hiring correspondence with other Google personnel and his cooperation during Google's investigation of this alleged conflict of i...

Excerpt: ...scan for Plaintiff. (Ibid.) Plaintiff did not receive a call from Defendant explaining the results of the CT scan or to discuss any risks or future treatment. (Ibid.) Instead, Plaintiff received a postcard concerning her test re sults which simply stated, “no abnormalities.” (Ibid.) On August 18, 2022, Plaintiff woke up and was nearly completely blind in her right eye. (See Attachment to Complaint.) Plaintiff alleges Defendant should have dia...

Excerpt: ...ah resided at t he time of commencement of the action. On April 22, 2022, Li filed the operative first amended complaint for declaratory relief (“FAC”). On September 2, 2022, Mummah concurrently filed an Answer to the FAC and a Cross- Complaint for Violation of Federal and California Fair Debt Collection Practices Acts (“FDCPA”) (“cross- complaint”). The cross-complaint named Li's attorney, Scott A. Flaxman, as a cross- defendant. ...

Excerpt: ...nt project in San Jose know n as “Downtown West.” (See FAC, ¶¶ 1 -2, 42 -47.) Defendant Leslie Kipp is one of several descendants of former owners of the parcels comprising the subject property and may claim to have some right, title, estate, interest, lien or cloud on title to the s ubject properties. (See FAC, ¶¶ 5 -41.) Plaintiffs collectively assert fee interest ownership of the subject properties, alleging that Civil Code section 831...

Excerpt: ...First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 21 February 2024. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. --- oo oOooo --- Orders on: (1) Motion Of Defendants/ Cross -Complainants For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication, On Cross -Complaint; (2) Motion Of Defendants For Summary Judg...

Excerpt: ...On 12/8/2022 Defendant served a notice of taking Plaintiff's deposition on 12/28/2022 and requested the RPD Nos. 1 -17 be produced at the deposition. Written objections must be served on the party noticing the deposition at least three calendar days before the deposition. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2025.410(a), (b).)3 Plaintiff served timely written objections to the notice of deposition by email on 12/23/2022. A party may move to compel deposition atte...

Excerpt: ...ar, make, and model as the [Subject Vehicle]”: (1) internal analyses and investigations regarding the “electrical defect” that allegedly manifested itself in the Subject Vehicle; (2) communications regarding the electrical defect; (3) electronic documents “relating to any decision to issue any notices, letters, campaigns, warranty extensions, technical service bulletins and recall concerning the [electrical defect]; (4) customer complaint...

Excerpt: ...of John Doe 6. Doe 1 argues that Doe 6 has placed his mental condition at issue in this case, given his claims that he “continues to suffer from post -traumatic stress disorder, depression, repressed feelings and memories of his encounters, aggression, psychological s truggles, substance abuse, psychological trauma[,] and an inability to maintain meaningful relationships as a result of the alleged childhood sexual abuse that forms the basis of ...

Excerpt: ...y opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 21 February 2024. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. --- oooOooo--- Order On Defendant Zhichao Lu's Motion To Dismiss Or, in the Alternative, Stay Proceedings. I. Statement of Facts. Plaintiff Jin Zhang (“Zhang”) started working for defendants Hefei Reliance Memory Ltd.; Reliance Mem...

Excerpt: ...ussed below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Related Case In August 2017, another Samaritan employee, Jennifer Richert, filed a similar action related to her wage statements, Richert v. Samaritan, LLC (Super. Ct. Santa Clara County, No. 17CV314186) (Richert) . Ms. Richert is represented by the same counsel who represent Plaintiffs here. She alleges that, during pay periods when she received overtime wages, her wage statements failed to i...

Excerpt: ...ry relief; and, 3) Fraud. On March 22, 2023, the Arzadons filed a demurrer to the complaint. Artemio passed away. On May 5, 2023, Estrella R. Floresca (“Estrella”), individually and as the successor of interest of Artemio C. Floresca, filed a first amended complaint (“FA C”) asserting identical causes of action. On June 6, 2023, the Arzadons filed an answer to the FAC. Estrella demurred to the unverified answer and on September 29, 2...

Excerpt: ...acate. 1. Backgrou nd This case arises out of Hopkins's representation of Carleen Whittelsey (“Whittelsey”) and her now -deceased husband Stuart G. Whittelsey Jr. (“Stuart”) in estate planning and estate administration over the course of numerous years, including in litigatio n regarding the estate after Stuart passed away. On June 22, 2021, Whittelsey filed this action for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against Hopkins....

Excerpt: ... “Defendants”) ar ising out of various alleged wage and hour violations. The Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”), filed by plaintiffs Chyna La She Cole (“Cole”) and Alexander Jay Matua (“Matua”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) on March 24, 2023, sets forth causes of action f or: (1) Failure to Pay Overtime Wages; (2) Failure to Pay Minimum Wages; (3) Failure to Provide Meal Periods; (4) Failure to Provide Rest Periods; (5) Wait...