Excerpt: ...rer: whether a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Schabarum v. California Legislature (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1205.) In considering such a motion the court may properly accept facts it may judicially notice or that cannot reasonably be controverted. (Columbia Casualty Co. v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 457, 468.) “The motion normally lies only for defects fully disclosed on the face of the pleading under attac...

Excerpt: ... not taken further action to perfect notice to the court of any stay triggered by a bankruptcy. On October 15, 2019, Defendant represented to the court that Plaintiff had filed for bankruptcy on October 11, 2019, and therefore this suit was stayed. No evidence had been presented to the court of any bankruptcy filing. Plaintiff acknowledges filing for bankruptcy, but represents that that bankruptcy filing was dismissed December 12, 2019, and that ...

Excerpt: ... summary judgment” filed on February 22, 2019 in case number 2:17‐cv‐01313‐WBS‐DB, provided as Exhibit A of Defendant's request for judicial notice. In the federal action filed by Plaintiff against Defendant, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant. (RJN, Exh. A, p. 15.) In making this determination, the district court concluded that Defendant Tan arrested Plaintiff “pursuant to a reasonable belief that there...

Excerpt: ...me Sav. Of Am. (1997) 59 Cal.App.4th 1192, 1199; Garcia v. Hejmadi (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 674, 689‐690.) Defendant Horne is awarded a monetary sanction against Plaintiff in the amount of $525 for reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in opposing this motion. A motion for reconsideration of a discovery order is subject to sanction for misuse of the discovery process. (Mattco Forge v. Arthur Young & Co. (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 1429, 1440‐1441.) Defe...

Excerpt: ...EW's (“JOE”) demurrers to Plaintiff's earlier action on these facts. The court takes judicial notice of this document as a record of a court of this state. (Ev. Code § 452, subd. (d).) Fifth Cause of Action: Interference with Contractual Relations. The elements of a cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relations are: (1) a contractual relationship between a plaintiff and a third party, (2) defendant's knowledge of th...

Excerpt: ...tober 25, 2019. The motion was filed November 15, 2019. The motion should have been finalized at the conclusion of the submission of evidence and/or raised prior to the court taking this matter under submission effective October 25, 2019. Second, Plaintiff did not disclose this claimed injury, damages or theory of recovery through discovery. Although the city was aware of the code enforcement citation that was apparently produced through discover...

Excerpt: ...to the Complaint based largely on the same arguments, but provided Plaintiff the opportunity to amend. In the interim, Plaintiff filed and served a First Amended Complaint, but after meeting and conferring with Defendants about alleged defects, voluntarily filed and served a Second Amended Complaint. Given the significant delay and many opportunities to amend, where the previously identified defects are repeated without correction, no further lea...

Excerpt: ...ranted. Defendant's claimed costs for subpoenas for medical, long term care, and school records are an “investigation expense” that cannot be shifted. (Code of Civ. Proc. § 1033.5, subd. (b)(2).) Plaintiffs motion to tax costs for filing fees and courier service is granted and denied. As the prevailing party, Defendant is entitled to recover filing fees. However, the numbers cited by Defendant are inconsistent with the schedule of filing fee...

Excerpt: ...t (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 864, 872; G.D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 29.) “In order to survive a motion to strike an allegation of punitive damages, the ultimate facts showing an entitlement to such relief must be pled by a plaintiff.” (Clauson v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1255.) The court had previously considered Plaintiffs' allegation that Defendant had made vague and unspecified verbal threats of ...

Excerpt: ...ough 13 of the declarations of Marlon and Febes Taasan and the transcript of the deposition of Hodges are overruled. Defendant Veriprise Processing Solutions, LLC's motion for summary judgment, based on the privilege pursuant to Civil Code section 2924(d), is denied. While it is true that Plaintiffs' allegation against Defendant consists solely of the issuance of statutory notices required by the nonjudicial foreclosure statutes (FAC, ¶ 24), Def...

Excerpt: ...ough 13 of the declarations of Marlon and Febes Taasan and the transcript of the deposition of Hodges are overruled. Defendant Veriprise Processing Solutions, LLC's motion for summary judgment, based on the privilege pursuant to Civil Code section 2924(d), is denied. While it is true that Plaintiffs' allegation against Defendant consists solely of the issuance of statutory notices required by the nonjudicial foreclosure statutes (FAC, ¶ 24), Def...

Excerpt: ... responding party to assert objections, including those based on privilege or work product. C.C.P. §2030.290(a) [interrogatories]; §2031.300(a) [requests for production]; §2033.280(a) [requests for admissions]. To the extent that objections are raised in “promptly” filed protective order motion, those raised objections may be preserved. However, if the protective order motion is denied, with those objections found invalid, in the absence o...

Excerpt: ...r Court (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 29.) “In order to survive a motion to strike an allegation of punitive damages, the ultimate facts showing an entitlement to such relief must be pled by a plaintiff.” (Clauson v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1255.) “[T]he act of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated may constitute an act of ‘malice' under section 3294 if performed under circumstances which disclose a conscious disregard...

Excerpt: ...r Court (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 29.) “In order to survive a motion to strike an allegation of punitive damages, the ultimate facts showing an entitlement to such relief must be pled by a plaintiff.” (Clauson v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1255.) “[T]he act of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated may constitute an act of ‘malice' under section 3294 if performed under circumstances which disclose a conscious disregard...

Excerpt: ...ns interstate commerce between Nevada limited liability company VEROS and California individual person LOPEZ. However, the court rules on this petition using the procedures of Code of Civil Procedure sections 1280 et seq. (Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 410 (Rosenthal).) California's procedural rules for petitions to compel arbitration are neutral between federal and state claims for arbitration enfor...

Excerpt: ...iation and informal resolution” that amounted to a sufficient “attempt to talk the matter over, compare their views, consult, and deliberate.” (Clement v. Alegre (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1294; Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1439.) Plaintiffs did not attempt to discuss the merits of any of Defendant's specific objections to any of Plaintiffs discovery requests, but simply took exception to the service of responses...

Excerpt: ...ns interstate commerce between Nevada limited liability company VEROS and California individual person LOPEZ. However, the court rules on this petition using the procedures of Code of Civil Procedure sections 1280 et seq. (Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 410 (Rosenthal).) California's procedural rules for petitions to compel arbitration are neutral between federal and state claims for arbitration enfor...

Excerpt: ...iation and informal resolution” that amounted to a sufficient “attempt to talk the matter over, compare their views, consult, and deliberate.” (Clement v. Alegre (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1294; Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1439.) Plaintiffs did not attempt to discuss the merits of any of Defendant's specific objections to any of Plaintiffs discovery requests, but simply took exception to the service of responses...

Excerpt: ...izes a party to move for summary adjudication “as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty”, which can be granted “only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty”. Here, BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. (“BMO”) seeks summary adjudication of 2 different types of breach of c...

Excerpt: ... an appeal on behalf of a corporation. Further, the amounts due from Luv Care, Inc. were not properly posted as security to perfect a timely appeal. Judgment shall be entered on behalf of Respondent against Luv Care, Inc. pursuant to the Labor Commissioner's decision. Respondent's unopposed motion to dismiss the individual appeal of Shobha Kothapalli is denied. While it appears that Ms. Kothapalli may have attempted to represent the interests of ...

Excerpt: ...defendants. The sole allegation against Defendant Lofas is that he is a resident of Vallejo. (SAC, ¶ 5.) The sole allegation against Defendant Estate of Jean Lofas is that it is domiciled in Vallejo. (SAC, ¶ 6.) Plaintiff has not made any factual allegations concerning Defendant Rentschler. Defendants' demurrer against the first cause of action for elder abuse, second cause of action for assault, third cause of action for battery, fourth cause ...

Excerpt: ...AVID ALLEN should defendant KELSA GENTRY terminate the contract, as she did. The parties agreed to payment based on the time spent multiplied by the hourly rate of every person who worked on the case, and no more. (See Defendants' Compendium of Exhibits, Exhibit 7). Therefore, the court may find, as a matter of law, that plaintiff is entitled to this amount only. Although plaintiff suggests that its retainer agreement with GENTRY is void because ...

Excerpt: ...s overruled as to the second cause of action for interference with prospective economic advantage, third cause of action for interference with contract, fifth cause of action for unjust enrichment, and sixth cause of action for violation of the Unfair Competition Law. Plaintiffs have adequately alleged facts supporting the material elements of these causes of action. Defendants' demurrer to the eighth cause of action for violation of the Rosentha...

Excerpt: ...ges that the lender or mortgage servicer denied an application for a loan modification on the false claim that the borrower failed to provide all required documentation. (Majd v. Bank of Am. (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 1293, 1304, 1306‐1307.) Plaintiffs allege a substantially similar situation in which Defendant Chase demanded, in violation of HAMP rules, documents that were impossible to produce and refused to evaluate their application for a loan ...

Excerpt: ...Mandri v. Judkins (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 326, 336 [nondisclosure or concealment may constitute actionable fraud “when the defendant had exclusive knowledge of material facts not known to the plaintiff”].) A general demurrer may not be sustained if the facts alleged state a cause of action on any theory. (Young v. Gannon (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 209, 220; Brousseau v. Jarrett (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 864, 870‐871.) Parties to appear to discuss the a...