Excerpt: ...in its ruling of April 28, 2021 finding that the statutory mechanism of enforcement under CCP § 664.6 wasn't available. At the time of counsel's execution of the settlement agreement, CCP § 664.6 only permitted enforcement if the agreement was signed by the parties. CCP § 664.6 was amended effective January 1, 2021 to permit enforcement (by entry of judgment) of a settlement agreement signed by counsel. The Court found (in its April 28, 2021 r...

Excerpt: ...ught pursuant to CCP § 2031.310 shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. CCP § 2031.310(b)(2). “A meet and confer declaration in support of a motion shall state facts showing a reasonable and good faith attempt at an informal resolution of each issue presented by the motion.” CCP § 2016.040. The Declaration of Stewart C. Altemus describes the meet and confer efforts he has made to resolve the issue with Plaintiff's counsel. T...

Excerpt: ...(d) and 453. Defendants' Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence. Defendant objects to ¶ 2 of the Declaration of Claudia Brisson which reads, “Plaintiff has not been able to conduct any discovery in this case.” Defendant objects on the grounds that this is a misstatement of the law and the facts of this case. The Court overrules this objection. Defendant objects to ¶ 4 which reads, ““Plaintiff does not have and has not been able to obtain cr...

Excerpt: ...of Motion: The Federal Arbitration Act and controlling California authority require the Court to enforce a parties' Arbitration Agreement and compel arbitration on all arbitrable claims. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Byrd (1985) 470 U.S. 213, 218. In deciding a motion to compel arbitration, the Court's role is limited to answering two questions: 1) does a valid agreement to arbitrate exist; and, if it does; 2) does the arbitration agreement encom...

Excerpt: ... and Crown. Plaintiff alleges various statutory violations of the SongBeverly Act and fraud by omission against Ford. Plaintiff alleges a single cause of action of negligence against Crown. None of the complaint's allegations relate to a term or obligation imposed by the Sale Contract between Plaintiff and Team Ford. Defendants separately seek to compel arbitration based on the Arbitration Provision in the Sales Contract which states in pertinent...

Excerpt: ...ice identified 32 areas of inquiry and demanded production of 28 categories of documents including any and all documents related to certain recalls and technical bulletins. On April 23, 2021, GM served a 32 page response setting forth various objections to the categories of inquiry and the request for production. After a brief and meet and confer process, GM offered to proceed with a deposition but subject to terms that were not acceptable to the...

Excerpt: ...sed liberally to permit amendment. Nestle v. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal. 3d 920, 939. “If the motion to amend is timely made and the granting of the motion will not prejudice the opposing party, it is error to refuse permission to amend and where the refusal also results in a party being deprived of the right to assert a meritorious cause of action or a meritorious defense, it is not only error but an abuse of discretion.” Morgan v. Sup.Ct. (1...

Excerpt: ...ealing fail as a matter of law on the grounds that plaintiffs made material misrepresentations during their claim that vitiated coverage under their Integon policy. Issue No. 2. Integon is entitled to summary adjudication on the grounds the undisputed facts establish plaintiffs' unclean hands bars plaintiffs' first cause of action for breach of contract against Integon. Issue No. 3. Integon is entitled to summary adjudication on the grounds the u...

Excerpt: ...lleges that the Third Amended Complaint is barred by public immunity. The Demurrer is unopposed. Cause of Action No. 1 (FEHA): Plaintiff's first cause of action is an alleged hostile work environment citing to Gov't Code § 12940(j) of FEHA. FEHA protects against discrimination against identified protected classes. The Third Amended Complaint fails to identify any protected class to which Plaintiff belonged. Without discrimination, harassment or ...

Excerpt: ..., Defendant also moves to exclude evidence regarding the revocation/alleged revocation of Millville Grange's Charter. In its moving papers, Defendant argues that Plaintiff has sued the wrong party. The Second Cause of Action alleged is Cancellation of Deed and Quiet Title. Defendant currently holds title to the real property at issue. In a quiet title action,"[t]he plaintiff shall name as defendants in the action the persons having adverse claims...

Excerpt: ... Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff opposes the motion and seeks sanctions. Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice. Granted. Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Evidence. Plaintiff makes 19 objections to various portions of the Declaration of John P. Kelley. Objections 1‐17 and 19. Overruled. Objection 18. Sustained only as to “He was asked if he knew his deposition had been noticed for April 28 and he again said ‘no.'” Merits. Moti...

Excerpt: .... Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal. 3d 920, 939. “If the motion to amend is timely made and the granting of the motion will not prejudice the opposing party, it is error to refuse permission to amend and where the refusal also results in a party being deprived of the right to assert a meritorious cause of action or a meritorious defense, it is not only error but an abuse of discretion.” Morgan v. Sup.Ct. (1959) 172 Cal.App.2d 527, 530. Defendants se...

Excerpt: ...unds that the Court lacks Jurisdiction, the matter is not ripe, that the first cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against Defendants, and the first cause of action is uncertain because Defendants cannot ascertain what damages, if any, were suffered by plaintiff. CCP 430.10(a), (e), (f). Defendants are also seeking sanctions under CCP § 128.5. In support of the Demurrer, Defendant requests that the Cou...

Excerpt: ...f of service does not explicitly state that service was personal, however, it does contain information that is generally only provided with personal service, i.e., the specific time of service and physical description of the person served. As it appears that Respondent was timely served, the Court is exercising its discretion to accept the proof of service and issue a ruling on the merits. Merits. “[T]he Legislature has expressed a strong publi...

Excerpt: ...CP §§ 1005(b) and 1013(c). Service on Defendant is proper as she is currently selfrepresented in Case No. 196018 as confirmed by no substitution of attorney on file and Defendant's indication 2 that she was proceeding in pro per at the resolution review hearing on July 12, 2021. Leave to File FAC. CCP § 473 provides that the court may “in furtherance of justice…allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading or proceedin...

Excerpt: ...n was continued, by stipulation, to the instant date. This case is currently set for trial on November 16, 2021. The Plaintiffs' complaint alleges 6 causes of action. Cause of Action No. 1 alleges violation of 14 separate Labor Code Sections; Cause of Action No. 2 alleges violation of Health and Safety Code Section 1278.5; Cause of Action No. 3 alleges violation of Labor Code Section 1102.5; Cause of Action No. 4 alleges ‘senior abuse'; Cause o...

Excerpt: ...g Company, Inc. who worked for Seco in California from June 6, 2015 through date of preliminary approval.” The Proposed PAGA Recipients will include all Class Members who do not opt out of the Settlement and worked for Defendant within the PAGA Period, which is defined as “any time from June 12, 2018 to date of preliminary approval.” The proposed class members are approximately 217 former and current employees of Defendant. The proposed set...

Excerpt: ...re granted. Meet and Confer CCP § 439(a)(3) provides : “The moving party shall file and serve with the motion for judgment on the pleadings a declaration stating” the attempts made to meet and confer. No such declaration was filed. That is sufficient to deny the motion. However, in the interest of judicial efficiency, the Court will exercise its 2 discretion and consider the merits of the motion, despite Plaintiff's failure to follow the sta...

Excerpt: ...2021. Kelly Cotton (“Moving Party”) now seeks leave to intervene pursuant to CCP § 387(a) and Welfare and Institutions Code § 15657.3 and CCP § 377.33, claiming to have superior rights to pursue these claims. Moving party has provided admissible evidence that she was nominated by the Decedent to act as his personal representative in his Will. The terms of the Will provide that all assets of the Estate are to be deposited into the Decedent'...

Excerpt: ...roposed cross‐complaint relates to the same parties and deals with disputes and issues arising from the use of an easement. The Court finds that allowing the filing of the cross‐complaint would be in the interests of justice. In reaching this finding the Court notes that there is presently no trial date set. The Court is in agreement with much of the discussion contained in the opposing party's briefing. The motion to amend is indeed late in ...

Excerpt: ... insurer will pay the policy limits of $400,000 plus the $6,000 Medical Payments Coverage. All parties who have appeared in the action per CCP § 1014 were provided proper notice. No Oppositions were filed. Merits of the Motion. The California Supreme Court case of Tech‐Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward‐ Clyde & Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488 provides that “the intent and policies underlying [Code of Civil Procedure] section 877.6 require that a numb...

Excerpt: ...o. 4: OVERRULED Objection No. 5: OVERRULED Objection No. 6: OVERRULED Objection No. 7: SUSTAINED on the grounds of a legal conclusion; OVERRULED as to the remainder Objection No. 8: OVERRULED Objection No. 9: OVERRULED Objection No. 10: OVERRULED Objection No. 11: OVERRULED Objection No. 12: OVERRULED Objection No. 13: OVERRULED Objection No. 14: OVERRULED Plaintiff's Objections: Objection No. 1: OVERRULED Objection No. 2: OVERRULED Objection No....

Excerpt: ... on May 27, 2021. Defendant contends it was timely as Defendant had until June 2, 2021 to file the Demurrer pursuant to CCP § 430.41(a)(2). CCP § 430.41(a)(2) states in part: The parties shall meet and confer at least five days before the date the responsive pleading is due. If the parties are not able to meet and confer at least five days prior to the date the responsive pleading is due, the demurring party shall be granted an automatic 30‐d...

Excerpt: ... insurer will pay the policy limits of $400,000 plus the $6,000 Medical Payments Coverage. All parties who have appeared in the action per CCP § 1014 were provided proper notice. No Oppositions were filed. Merits of the Motion. The California Supreme Court case of Tech‐Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward‐ Clyde & Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488 provides that “the intent and policies underlying [Code of Civil Procedure] section 877.6 require that a numb...

Excerpt: ... on May 27, 2021. Defendant contends it was timely as Defendant had until June 2, 2021 to file the Demurrer pursuant to CCP § 430.41(a)(2). CCP § 430.41(a)(2) states in part: The parties shall meet and confer at least five days before the date the responsive pleading is due. If the parties are not able to meet and confer at least five days prior to the date the responsive pleading is due, the demurring party shall be granted an automatic 30‐d...