Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

879 Results

Location: Santa Cruz x
2024.02.27 Motion for Attorney Fees 053
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...t Plaintiff failed to provide the Agreement in support of its motion, failed to provide invoice support for the charged fees, and failed to distinguish which fees were related to various events in the case (contempt motion, summary judgment, etc.). LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 2024 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 4 of 14 The Court's original order did not approve fees and costs associated with the entire action, only the OSC contempt ...
2024.02.22 OSC Re Contempt, Fines, Incarceration and Sanctions, or for Evidentiary, Terminating Sanctions 735
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...empt and fined, incarcerated and sanctioned for her willful disobedience of the Court's orders of 10/23/23 and 12/18/23 regarding her continued deposition dates. Defendant further moves for evidentiary and/or terminating sanctions for Plaintiff's repeated violations of the Discovery Act and refusal to comply with court orders. Defendant seeks monetary sanctions in the amount of $4,920 for the costs and fees incurred in bringing this motion. Plai...
2024.02.22 Motion for Protective Order 844
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...aintiff seeks to depose a corporate president, or corporate officer at the apex of the corporate hierarchy, absent a reasonable indication of the officer's personal knowledge of the case and absent exhaustion of less intrusive discovery methods." (Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1287.) "[T]he trial court should first determine whether the plaintiff has shown good cause that the official has uniqu...
2024.02.22 Demurrer 839
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.22
Excerpt: ...er the complaint states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. (Taylor v. City of Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 1216, 1228.) The court “treat[s] the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law ....” (Berkley v. Dowds (2007) 152 ...
2024.02.20 Motion to Amend Judgment 786
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.20
Excerpt: ...ectly controlled the wages, hours, or working conditions of the affected workforce of the judgment debtor. (Labor Code §200.3(2)(3); Declaration of Mohsin, ¶¶2 -17; Declaration of Ali Ammar, Exhibits A through L.) Further, no opposition was filed as to any of these entities. The motion is denied as to Zalo Holdings LP on the grounds that there is insufficient evidence that it uses substantially the same facilities or substantially the same wo...
2024.02.16 Special Motion to Strike Complaint, Demurrer, Motion to Strike 971
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...verned by various recorded Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (“CC&R”) and managed by the Pajaro Dunes Association (“Association”). Changes to properties must be proposed to the Association Board and/or Design Committee in accordance with the CC&Rs. (Complaint ¶¶4 -5; Request for Judicial Notice.) At some point prior to June 2022, Plaintiffs applied to remodel the interior of the home and construct multiple decks. In June 2022, the ...
2024.02.15 Motion to Compel Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 765
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.15
Excerpt: ...signed. (Beene Decl., ¶¶10- 15). Defendants never responded to the discovery prior to the filing of this motion. Defendants filed an untimely Opposition to the motion, six court days after the filing deadline, contending they have suggested many times to Plaintiff's counsel how they thought he should “remedy” the situation, but that they would not respond to the discovery. Defendants fail to provide any declaration or any form of actual ...
2024.02.14 Motion to Vacate Order to Arbitrate 531
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.14
Excerpt: ... Obviously, it was not something that could be adjudicated at a case management conference. LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2024 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 4 of 6 The issue is whether EFAA's prohibition to arbitrate sexual harassment claims applies to cases in which the harassment and termination occurred prior to its enactment, as is the case here. Plaintiff asserts yes, because the act states it applies to disputes, and this dispu...
2024.02.14 Demurrer 614
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.14
Excerpt: ...es, plants, seeds, and firewood to the public. (Complaint at ¶ 1.) Plaintiff alleges that in the years after the CZU Complex fire, several trees, and tree limbs had fallen on the property. While trimming and bucking trees, a dead and decaying limb from an overhanging tree fell and struck Plaintiff, breaking his spine and causing permanent paralysis. (Complaint at ¶ 2.) At the time of the incident, Plaintiff alleges he was an employee of Defen...
2024.02.13 Motion to Compel Site Inspection 609
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.13
Excerpt: ...m Deendants' new decks block their views, which violates the deed restrictions on the property because the decks intrude into the setback, and violates their privacy because anyone on the elevated decks can look directly into their homes and yards. (TAC ¶¶ 1, 47-50, 53-55) Deendants began construction in late 2021. (TAC ¶¶ 20, 36.) Plainti¯s contend that the plans submitted to the County or the project included misleading inormation reg...
2024.02.09 Demurrer to FAC 360
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.09
Excerpt: ...BACKGROUND: Plainti¯ Sungrown brought a complaint for negligence, negligence per se, trespass, conversion, tortious interference with contractual relations, and injunctive relief based on the allegation the County has been incorrectly testing for THC in commercial hemp crops since 2019. This resulted in Plainti¯'s loss of 15 acres of commercial hemp. LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 2024 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 2 of 9 Following...
2024.02.09 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 547
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.09
Excerpt: ...perly identify the nature of the claim and parties a¯ected. Ibid. Where the complaint is so confusing defendant cannot tell what it must answer for, then a demurrer may be appropriate. (Ibid., citing Williams v. Beechnut Nutrition Corp. (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 135, 139, fn. 2; see also CCP §430.10(f).) The Complaint appears to be nearly identical to the deÞcient complaint in 23CV01083 (which Plainti¯ voluntarily dismissed on 10/27/23 instead ...
2024.02.09 Motion to Compel Responses 986
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.09
Excerpt: ...he Opposition, the discovery responses and documents at issue were served on January 7, 2022. (Dec. of Cornejo at ¶ 7.) Plainti¯s never met and conferred. (Dec. of Cornejo at ¶ 9.) Plainti¯'s motion is procedurally defective and untimely. Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.310, which governs motions to compel further responses to inspections, requires that such motions be Þled and served within 45 days of service of the responses. “The...
2024.02.07 Demurrer 653
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...ages.” Plainti¯'s complaint is very poorly drafted and is, in some instances, virtually unintelligible. There are missing words, improper tense, and the grammar and syntax is poor. It is thus di¯icult to decipher what Plainti¯ is alleging at various points within the complaint. “Plainti¯'s primary allegation is that [Santa Cruz County] Ordinance 7.38 has lost sight of State's mandate requiring Plainti¯ to be allowed to the (sic) pra...
2024.02.05 Demurrer 035
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.02.05
Excerpt: ... was recorded, clouding title to Plainti¯'s property. In the FAC, Plainti¯ is requesting the court “to review the validity of document 2007- 0015834 dated March 23, 2007 and document 2007-0018873. Plainti¯ requests entry of an Order that document 2007-0015834 is not acknowledged, it is a forged documents and cannot be recorded, and therefore is to be removed from the Santa Cruz County recorders records along with document 2007-0018873. Th...
2024.01.31 Demurrer 837
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...ainti¯ and his parents, and Myers recommended that Plainti¯ participate in the Travelling School Summer Program, which Myers supervised and was part of the District. (FAC at ¶ 19.) Based upon Myers's recommendation, Plainti¯ participated in the Traveling School Summer Program in 1983. It was at this time Plainti¯ alleges he was groomed for abuse, sexually assaulted, and abused by Myers. (FAC at ¶ 18.) Myers is alleged to have had studen...
2024.01.30 Motion to Compel Verified Responses 746
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ...issions, and Demand for Production of Documents and monetary sanctions as to Plainti¯s Sheryl Lynn Vollers Pinard and Alfred Pinard, III. LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JANUARY 30, 2024 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 2 of 3 On October 5, 2023, Defendants' counsel served form interrogatories, requests for admissions (counsel in his declaration states his o¯ice served special interrogatories but a reference to special interrogatories only appears...
2024.01.29 Motion to Bifurcate 631
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.29
Excerpt: ...ir Plan (“CPF”). The Þrst amended complaint alleges breach o the implied covenant o good aith and air dealing; the causes o action or aiding and abetting, and civil conspiracy were dismissed without prejudice on October 5, 2022. Beore the court is Plainti¯'s Motion or Biurcation to Permit Court Trial Regarding the Validity and Enorceability o Ms. Mapel's Insurance Policy. The motion is made pursuant to Code o Civil Procedure se...
2024.01.29 Motion for Attorney Fees 892
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.29
Excerpt: ...gment “nunc pro tunc” to include Plainti¯'s attorney's fees. Counsel claims four hours of time at $200.00/hour or $800.00. Attached to the motion is a declaration from counsel Harlan Reese who states that he is only seeking compensation for four hours of work even though he spent more time. A review of the Court Þle shows default judgment was entered on March 10, 2020, based upon Plainti¯'s written declaration, in the amount of $8,781.91...
2024.01.26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 638
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.26
Excerpt: ...n the sidewalk while falling forward and injuring her shoulder, neck, hip and back. The accident happened at the intersection [of] Pelton Avenue and Lighthouse Avenue." In connection with this cause of achon she alleges negligence, willful failure to warn, and dangerous condition of public property. Defendant filed its Answer on June 27, 2023. Defendant now brings a motion for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to comp...
2024.01.25 Motion for Reconsideration 838
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.25
Excerpt: ...vice on the parties on November 13, 2023. Therefore, any motion to reconsider the court's order must have been filed by November 23, 2023. The Notice of Entry of Order/Judgment and Order were filed on November 27, 2023. Petitioner has brought this motion because she wishes to present arguments in relation to the court's tentative ruling on the underlying Writ of Mandate. The new circumstances, she asserts, is that counsel for Respondents "engaged...
2024.01.24 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 899
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...ijuana dispensary. Canna filed suit against the County of Santa Cruz ("County") following two Sheriff's Department raids in which 1800 marijuana plants were destroyed in the first raid and 700 in a second raid. In the Spring of 2015, Plaintiff's assignor Granny Purps, commenced a medical marijuana growing operation on Fern Flat Road in Aptos. On 6/22/15, the Sheriff's Department appeared at the Property and destroyed 1,800 cannabis plantsl valued...
2024.01.23 Demurrers 355
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.23
Excerpt: ...aintiff appears to ask this Court to prevent the seizure of wages related to child support arrears judgments and bases his claims on federal constitutional law related to due process. Defendants demur on the grounds that the petition fails to state facts constituting any cause of action, is fatally uncertain, fails to properly identify which claims relate to which parties, and that their actvities in issuing earnings withholding orders against Pl...
2024.01.19 Petition for Writ of Mandate 597
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...n, provides: (a) Where the writ is issued for the purpose of inquiring into the validity of any final administrative order or decision made as the result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or officer, the case shall be heard by the court sitting without a jury. (b) The inquiry in su...
2024.01.18 Motion for Summary Judgment 477
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...ed by defendant Fifty-Five River Street Associates, LLC. ("Fifty-Five River") who was insured by Nationw-de. Plaintiffs operated businesses out of the premises. There are three corporate plaintiffs: Media Rights Technologies, Inc. ("MRT"), Encryptos, and Bluebeat, Inc. Mr. Risan is the Chief Executve Officer of all three companies. (Opp. at pg. 1.) In 2016, water from a storm event entered into the building through the roof. Plaintiffs allege the...
2024.01.16 Motion for Terminating and Monetary Sanctions 070
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.16
Excerpt: ...ons pursuant to CCP 5128.7. Defendants declare they have met the statute's 21- day safe harbor requirement by serving Plaintiff on 11/17/23 with a copy of the motion. (Supplemental Declaration of Marquis, 94) This motion was filed following that period, on 12/12/23. Ms. Marquis seeks $18,074.00 for her tme and that of her associate in their efforts to meet and confer with Plaintiff and preparation of papers related to the motion. Defendants asser...
2024.01.16 Motion for Good Faith Settlement 232
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.16
Excerpt: ...signment is too speculative. Based on the pleadings and the Court's familiarity with this matter, the settlement paid to Plaintiff of $375,000 in exchange for a dismissal with prejudice of the complaint against Defendants Hugo Cazares, Faith & Family Farms, and Jessie Melendrez is within the reasonable range of the settling tortfeasors' proportional share of comparative liability for the alleged damages. (Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & Assoc...
2024.01.11 Motion to Tax Costs, to Credit Payments 406
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...d (neither allowed nor prohibited) in CCP 51033.5. (CCP S1033.5(c)(4).) However, whether awarded as allowable costs underthe statute, or in the court's discretion, all costs are subject to the conditions that they are (1) actually incurred; (2) necessary to the conduct of the litigation rather than merely convenient or beneficial to its preparation; and (3) reasonable in amount. (CCP If items on their face appear to be proper charges, the verifie...
2024.01.11 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 358
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...NTIFFS' MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES BY DEFENDANT DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO; REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE; AND SANCTIONS This is a commercial rent collection case related to a Subway retail store located at 1487 Main Street, Watsonville in the Overlook Shopping Center. Defendants are Ramanjeet Singh Saini, Subway Real Estate, LLC, and Doctor's Associate's LLC. As alleged, from 3/1/20 through 8/31/...
2024.01.09 Motion to Lift Stay, Demurrer 689
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.09
Excerpt: ... Santa Cruz County with Canepa Group. Meanwhile, pursuant to the terms of the sales agreement, Fisken and Carl were embroiled in litigation in the United Kingdom on their claims related to the sale. On 10/30/18, this Court stayed the action pending resolution of the case in the London Circuit Commercial Court (Claim No. LM-2018-000138). The London claim was brought by Plaintiff Friskin for specific performance/delivery of the car pursuant to its ...
2024.01.08 Motion for Attorney Fees 053
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.08
Excerpt: ...s hourly rate for this matter is $475, and costs associated with the entre action total $3,135.19. The total fees amount also includes $15,716.25 in paralegal fees. 1. Legal principles re: attorney fee awards: Serrano Ill requires the trial court to first determine a touchstone or "lodestar" figure based on a careful compilation of the tme spent and reasonable hourly compensation for each LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JANUARY 8, 2024 TIM...
2024.01.08 Demurrer to FAP 443
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.08
Excerpt: ... California Constitution. She seeks to vacate the election and set aside all associated property fee assessments. CALFIRE is named as a Real Party in Interest. County demurrers to Petitioner's First Amended Petition, filed 6/5/20, for Writ of Mandate on the following general grounds: • The entire petition fails to comply with applicable Rules of Court and is so vague, ambiguous, uncertain and unintelligible, and fails to state facts supporting ...
2024.01.04 Special Motion to Strike FAC 821
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.04
Excerpt: ... low valuations which parties in a prior suit (the Elwards) used to force the sale of properties they owned with Plaintiff. There are two causes of action, professional negligence as to the Futura Partnership (1906 Soquel Property) and professional negligence as to the 108 Eastgate and 1999 Soquel Properties. Plaintiff alleges he sued his former business partners, the Elwards, in two suits in late 2019 related to the real properties. (FAC "13-14....
2024.01.04 Motion for Reconsideration 017
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2024.01.04
Excerpt: ...t facts, circumstances, or law, make application to the same judge or court that made the order, to reconsider the matter and modify, amend, or revoke the prior order." The legislative intent was to restrict motions for reconsideration to circumstances where a party offers the court some fact or circumstance not previously considered, and some valid reason for not offering it earlier. (Weil & Brown, Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2023) S 9:328...
2023.12.28 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer 232
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...ve defenses (the 26th 27th and 28th). Defendant wishes to add Labor Code defenses related to Plaintiff Jorge Rodriguez's employment status, namely statutory employee, exclusive remedy rule, and benefits setoff. (Mantych Decl. Ex. 1.) Defendant argues these defenses are legal, will not add to discovery, will allow it to perfect its Answer in advance of trial, and avoid waiver of defenses that have arisen during the course of the action. Plaintiff ...
2023.12.26 Demurrer 358
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.26
Excerpt: ...2) 101 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1405.) The complaint is to be given a reasonable interpretation and read in context. (See Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081.) Defects must appear on the face of pleading or be judicially noticed. (Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 cal.App.4th 968, 994; SKF Farms v. superior court (1984) 153 cal.App.3d 902, 905.) Defendant argues that Plaintiff lacks both the capacity to sue and the stan...
2023.12.21 Demurrer to SAC, Motion to Strike 841
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ... 2023 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 2 of 6 Plaintiff filed declarations stating generally that she attempted to adhere to the Court's order on the earlier demurrer but that due to an urgent situation she is unable to timely respond to the motions. She filed no other opposition to Defendants' arguments. SUMMARY OF COURT RULING: As explained below, the Court's rulings on the demurrers are: • Sixth cause of action, Discrimination due to national origin —...
2023.12.18 Demurrer 854
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.18
Excerpt: ...l„ Inc. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1405.) Fraud allegations must be pleaded with more detail than other causes of action. (Heritage Pac. Fin., LLC v. Monroy (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 972, 989.) The facts constituting the fraud, including every element of the cause of action, must be alleged "factually and specifically," i.e., the plaintiff must plead facts showing the defendant's misrepresentation (or omission that the defendant had a duty to di...
2023.12.13 Motions for New Trial and Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict 347
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ...al motions. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND: The jury returned a verdict on 7/14/23 for Plaintiffs in the amount of $150,000 for Plaintiff Perslow and $413,491.98 for Plaintiff Barabba following an 8-day trial. The jury's verdict found Defendants liable for Plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and findings as to fiduciary duties owed by Defendant Torres. Following the jury trial, a court t...
2023.12.12 Petition for Writ of Mandate 796
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.12
Excerpt: ...of supervisor responsibilities; ethics; relationships; performance; and conduct. City alleged and was successful in demonstrating to the City Manager and City Council that Ball violated these City policies when he sexually harassed a subordinate (Officer Wowak) and retaliated against her. Petitioner's writ is denied. As discussed below, based on this Court's independent review of the evidence, the weight of the evidence supports the CUIA8's decis...
2023.12.11 Demurrer to FAC 603
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.11
Excerpt: ...ces from expressly alleged facts are deemed true. (Sheehan v. San Francisco 49ers, Ltd. (2009) 45 Cal.4th 992, 998; Cundiff v. GTE Cal. , Inc. (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1395, 1405.) Ifthe complaint states a cause of action under any theory, regardless of the title under which the factual basis for relief is stated, that aspect of the complaint is good against a demurrer. "[Wle are not limited to plaintiffs' theory of recovery in testing the sufficie...
2023.12.08 Motion in Limine 010
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.08
Excerpt: ... these findings. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This matter involves a dispute over the sale of real property (an allotment) located in Paradise Park. In 2003, John Simas's father purchased an "allotment" for him to use and occupy. Simas became a member of Paradise Park Masonic Club in 2003. He lived there until he decided to move to Brazil, where he intended to permanently live. While in Brazil, Simas and plaintiffs Craig and Kelly Powell (Craig is John's c...
2023.12.07 Motion to Compel Inspection of Dog 678
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.07
Excerpt: ...animal with known dangerous propensities, strict liability pursuant to Civil Code section 3342, and negligence. He seeks general and special damages. Plaintiff seeks an order compelling the examination and inspection of Pip by Plaintiff's expert, with the following requests to take place at the examination: 1. Pip's reacton to a neutral third party from a safe and reasonable distance; 2. Pip being walked on the sidewalk by a competent, controllin...
2023.12.06 Motion for Summary Judgment 189
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ... Roman claims she suffered a ruptured aneurysm while driving her vehicle. The aneurysm occurred while she was exiting the freeway near her home; her vehicle collided with Plaintiffs' vehicle, her car jumped the median and eventually landed off the roadway. Defendant asserts medical emergency as a defense — that in the seconds before the accident she suffered a ruptured aneurysm and is not responsible for the collision. Plaintiffs' Complaint inc...
2023.12.05 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 746
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.05
Excerpt: ... of the title under which the factual basis for relief is stated, that aspect of the complaint is good against a demurrer. "[Wle are not limited to plaintiffs' theory of recovery in testing the sufficiency of their complaint against a demurrer, but instead must determine if the factual allegations of the complaint are adequate to state a cause of action under LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2023 TIME: 8:30 A.M. Page 2 of 2 any ...
2023.12.04 Motions to Compel Responses, to Deem RFAs Admitted 844
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.12.04
Excerpt: ...ubd. (a) & (b) to obtain supplemental responses. Plaintiff specifically seeks supplemental responses to nos. 12.2-12.7, 13.1-13.2, 15.1, 15.2-16.20, and 17.1. Asto requests 12.2-12.7, 13.1, 13.2, 16.2-16.20 and 15.1, CEA asserts that this second set of interrogatories is improper "because CEA had already responded to the same set of discovery on July 1, 2023, and that CEA has no duty to update its discovery responses, absent the service of a Supp...
2023.11.29 Demurrer 764
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ... over the subject matter of the action shall be joined as a party in the action if (1) in his absence complete relief cannot be accorded among those already parties or (2) he claims an interest relating to the subject of the achon and is so situated that the disposition of the action in his absence may (i) as a practical matter impair or impede his ability to protect that interest or (ii) leave any of the persons already parties subject to a subs...
2023.11.22 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 941
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.11.22
Excerpt: ...further responses after the motion was filed and Defendant has failed to address those new responses or take the motion off calendar. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Johanna Ronsse filed her Complaint on 9/9/22 against three defendants she alleges were complicit in financial elder abuse of her father, who died 4/25/22. She alleges that Maria Hulsey, former neighbor of her father John Ronsse, used undue influence in having John sign over his mobile h...
2023.11.21 Demurrers to FAC 978
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.11.21
Excerpt: ...doctor's discharge order and a safe discharge option. When these conditions are not met, Kindred must continue to treat the patient. Acute care hospitals, like Kindred's, operate at a much higher care level than skilled nursing facilities. (FAC "14-7.) Kindred believes defendant SCMMMCC ("Alliance") is a regional county organized health system formed to administer the Medicare (Medi-Cal) managed care program in Santa Cruz, Monterey, and Merced co...
2023.11.17 Motion to Continue Trial Date 232
Location: Santa Cruz
Judge: All Departments
Hearing Date: 2023.11.17
Excerpt: ...alendar conflict. In support of their motion, counsel for moving parties states he has a calendar conflict with this trial date and that he was assigned as trial counsel to this case after prior counsel resigned. He is to start trial in Stanislaus County on February 6, 2024. Mr. Hermanson states: "the trial judge in the Stanislaus County [case] advised there would be no additional contnuances. Also, I see no chance of the Stanislaus County case r...

879 Results

Per page

Pages