Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

5842 Results

Location: Santa Clara x
2024.03.19 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 647
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...ttachment alleges that “Pomogaibo has to sent [sic] order for publication, summons, and credit card details to newspaper. Newspaper has to publish summons 4 weeks and charge $400 for it. Newspaper refused to comply with court order based on conversation with attorney Ekate rina Berman, who said to newspaper three false datums – she represented his client Yevgeniy Babichev, [I]'m [vexatious] litigant, [I] have not received permission from pres...
2024.03.19 Demurrer to FAC 587
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...t a single cause of action for intentional tort – defamation.2 Zhan alleges that Tang intentionally and maliciously mistranslated Zhan's emails from Chinese to English as part of the evidence submitted to the Santa Cruz court in the civil harassment case. According to Zh an, she notified Tang about these alleged mistranslations and thereafter sent a cease -and -desist letter to Tang. Zhan never received a response from Tang. Zhan then filed t...
2024.03.19 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 119
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Pennypacker, Evette D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...zemipour lied about investment opportunities, which caused Plaintiff to invest money with him that Kazemipour spent on unauthorized personal expenses and travel. (FAC, ¶ 21.) With the assistance of defendant Troy Foster, Kazemipour defrauded Plaintiff out of approxima tely $750,638. (Ibid.) On information and belief, Tirgari alleges from 2019 to 2021, Kazemipour used funds from their joint investment account for his own personal benefit and the...
2024.03.14 Motion for Attorney Fees 664
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Monahan, William
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...osts of $1,5660.40 for a total of $121,272.90. Nguyen is the “prevailing defendant under CCP section 425.16(c), which mandates that “a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs.” (CCP § 425.16(c).) On November 8, 2023, the Court issued an order granting Nguyen's anti -SLAPP motion with respect to six of the seven counts contained in Plaintiff's First Amended Complai...
2024.03.14 Demurrer 490
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Monahan, William
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...ollectively, “Defendants”). Dr. Kethineni is a medical doctor with a specialization in infectious diseases who practices at San Joquin General Hospital. (Complaint at ¶ 2.) In December 2010, non- party Neelinfo, Inc. (“Neelinfo”), a California c orporation, entered into a commercial agreement (“Agreement”) with defendant Techorbit, a Texas corporation. (Complaint at ¶ 3.) On June 13, 2012, Techorbit filed an action against Dr. Keth...
2024.03.14 Demurrer 990
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rosen, Amber
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...d SAC, Plaintiff had a duty to “competently” advise City Entities and to defend them in “numerous lawsuits” involving the City Entities' ownership of the “San Francisco 49ers football team.” (Id. at ¶ 3.) From approximately February 2017 to December 2017, Plaintiff became the “Interim City Attorney” for the Defendant, in a “part time capacity.” (Id. at ¶ 4.) From December 19, 2017, until his termination on September 2, 2021,...
2024.03.14 Demurrer or Motion to Stay 984
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Monahan, William
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...c. (collectively, “Defendants”). According to the first amended complaint (“FAC”), the subject of this action concerns certain real property located at 3962 Ross Avenue in San Jose, California (“Property”). (FAC at ¶ 1.) The Mathew Wang Li ving Trust Dated May 5, 2021 (“Trust”) was and is the co -owner of the Property. (FAC at ¶ 2.) Plaintiff and his late wife, Betty Wang (“Betty”1), were cotrustees of the Trust. (Ibid.) Up...
2024.03.14 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 595
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Adams, Charles F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...laintiff's motion. I. BACKGROUND As alleged in the operative complaint, Plaintiff worked for Defendant as an RN Case Manager from November 13, 2020 to June 28, 2021. (Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Damages (“SAC”), ¶ 6.) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant f ailed to provide her and other employees with accurate itemized wage statements and failed to pay meal and rest break premiums at the regular rate of pay. (Id., ¶ 18.) Specific...
2024.03.14 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 298
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Adams, Charles F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...er Labor Code vio lations. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for approval of PAGA settlement, which is unopposed. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion. VII. BACKGROUND According to the allegations of the operative First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff was employed by Defendants as a non -exempt employee from January 1, 2017, through March 25, 2021. Defendant Lite -On Inc. is engaged in the research, development, sale and dist...
2024.03.14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 698
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...s. (Complaint, ¶ 1.) O n March 5, 2015, Royal Coach and Miletak entered into an employment agreement in which Miletak agreed to participate in Royal Coach's Student Driver Trainee Program. (Id. at ¶ 5.) Under the program, Royal Coach would pay Student Driver Trainees to attend classroom instruction, enabling them then to apply for a commercial driver's license. (Ibid.) Upon completion of the program, Royal Coach had the option to hire trainees ...
2024.03.14 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement 871
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Adams, Charles F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ... complaint wage statem ents, among other Labor Code violations. Before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of settlement, which is unopposed. As discussed below, if satisfactory clarification is provided concerning whether the notice will be provided in lan guages other than English, the Court will GRANT the motion. XIII. BACKGROUND According to the allegations of the operative Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), Plaintiffs...
2024.03.14 Motion for Summary Judgment 017
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ... (“UPI”). (Complaint, ¶¶ 4 -5.) Cheng, a licensed accountant, provided accounting services to the brothers and to UPI. (Id. at ¶¶ 2 -3, 6, 9, 14 & 19.) In 1991, UPI established a Money Purchase Pension Plan (“Plan 1”) and a Profit Sharing Plan (“Plan 2”). (Complaint, ¶ 10.) S cott made contributions and payments to Plan 1 and Plan 2. (Id. at ¶ 12.) In addition, UPI was required to make annual contributions to Plan 1 for Scott. ...
2024.03.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 224
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rosen, Amber
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...n May 3, 2023, plaintiff s Lingsen and Hang Chun Leung (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed the FAC against defendants Welcome Market and Welcome Market's owner, Tawa Supermarket, Inc. (“Tawa”) (collectively, “Defendants”) asserting causes of action for: 1) Premises liability; 2) Negligence; and, 3) Loss of consortium. Defendants move for summary judgment, or, in the alterative, for summary adjudication of each cause of action, on the ...
2024.03.14 Motion to Compel Arbitration 219
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Pennypacker, Evette D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: .... App. 4th 1272, 1283 (citations omitted).) “The petitioner bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by a preponderance of the evidence, and a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its defense. [Citation.] In these summary proceedings, the trial court sits as a trier of fact, weighing all the affidavits, declarations, and other documenta...
2024.03.14 Motion to Compel Arbitration, to Stay Representative PAGA Claim 121
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Adams, Charles F
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...periods or pay associated premiums, failure to provide code -compliant wage statements, and other Labor Code violations. Before the Court is Defendants' motion to (1) compel arbitration of Plaintiffs' individual PAGA claims and (2) stay the representative PAGA claim pending resolution of the arbitration, which is opposed by Plaintiffs. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiffs' individual PAGA cla...
2024.03.14 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 773
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rosen, Amber
Hearing Date: 2024.03.14
Excerpt: ...egligent repai r, and fraud by concealment. Plaintiffs now seek an order compelling Ford to produce documents relating to (1) the subject Vehicle (RFP Nos. 1, 3, 12, 15); (2) internal Knowledge and investigation Discovery (RFP Nos. 17, 19, 31, 36, and 39); (3) documents concerning summaries and memos regarding transmission defects (RFP Nos. 43, 45, and 46); (4) documents concerning buyback policies and procedures (RFP Nos. 56, 57, 58, 68, 69, and...
2024.03.13 Motion to Seal 785
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Zayner, Theodore C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...license Old DivX's codec software. (Complaint, ¶ 1.) In 2013, Plaintiff and Old DivX allegedly amended the contract so Plaintiff could purchase a perpetual license to the Old DivX decoder software. (Id. at ¶ 2.) Plaintiff subsequently paid the perpetual license fee. (I bid.) Plaintiff alleges that it continued using, and reporting its use of, the perpetually licensed Old DivX software for the next eight years without any issues or disputes. (Co...
2024.03.13 Motion to be Relieved as Counsel 663
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Zayner, Theodore C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ..., 2022, sets f orth the following causes of action: (1) Willful Misclassification of Employees as Independent Contractors; (2) Failure to Provide Required Meal Periods; (3) Failure to Provide Required Rest Breaks; (4) Failure to Pay Overtime Wages; (5) Failure to Pay Min imum Wages; (6) Failure to Pay Timely Wages; (7) Failure to Pay All Wages Due to Discharged and Quitting Employees; (8) Failure to Maintain Required Records; (9) Failure to Furn...
2024.03.13 Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement 999
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Zayner, Theodore C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ... Under the Pri vate Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Plaintiff alleges that defendant Facility Masters, Inc. (“Defendant”) had an unlawful rounding policy, failed to compensate employees for “off the clock” time, failed to compensate employees when they worked through me al periods, failed to accurately calculate employees' regular rate of pay, failed to provide employees with accurate and complete itemized wage statements, failed to k...
2024.03.13 Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement 701
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Zayner, Theodore C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...ivil Penalties for Violations of California Labor Code, Pursuant to PAGA, §§ 2698, et seq. (“PAGA”). The parties reached a settlement of the PAGA claim. Plaintiff moved for approval of the PAGA settlement. The motion was unopposed. On February 7, 2024, the court continu ed the motion for approval of the PAGA settlement to March 13, 2024. The court explained that it had multiple concerns regarding the fairness of the settlement. First, the l...
2024.03.13 Motion for Protective Order 666
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Zayner, Theodore C
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...n February 18, 2020, sets forth the following causes of action: (1) Failure to Pay All Hours Worked; (2) Failure to Pay All Overtime Hours; (3) Meal Period Violations; (4) Rest Period Violations; (5) Failure to Reimburse Business Expenses; (6) Wage Statement Violations; (7) Waiting Time Penalties; (8) Private Attorney General Act; and (9) Unfair Competition in Violation of Cal. Business and Professions Code § 17200, et seq. On April 22, 2022, Pl...
2024.03.12 Motion to Stay Case 307
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...opposes the motion. Because the court sees little to no utility in a four -month stay, and because Timothy does not demonstrate any valid basis for a stay, the court DENIES the motion. Timothy contends that this case was commenced improperly by his brother, Brian Bumb (“Brian”), in Bria n's capacity as manager of S.J. Bayshore, and that the First Street case will establish this fact by granting Timothy a declaratory judgment that Brian unlawf...
2024.03.12 Motion to Set Aside Default 377
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Monahan, William
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...ion”]; Stepan v. Garcia (1974) 43 Cal.App.3d 497, 500 [the court may take judicial notice of its own file].) Accordingly, the court takes judicial notice of its own file in this matter. Plaintiff's moving papers filed 10/10/2023 and on 2/1/2024 show her address is: 2694 GLEN DOON CT, SAN JOSE, CA 95148. Here, the proof of service filed 6/29/2022 shows that Defendant was served by substitute service. It states that the summons and complaint ...
2024.03.12 Motion to Set Aside Default 340
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Pennypacker, Evette D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...d and wa s responsible for maintaining the roadway and contracted with Defendant MasTec North America, Inc. (“MasTec”) to dig and/or maintain trenches or tunnels for electrical components near where Plaintiff's accident occurred. (Complaint, ¶¶10 -11.) According t o Plaintiff, MasTec contracted with Smart Communications Systems, LLC (“SCS”) to assist and oversee the construction, including resurfacing the roadway at the accident locatio...
2024.03.12 Motion to Quash Service 328
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Pennypacker, Evette D
Hearing Date: 2024.03.12
Excerpt: ...der”) alleges on February 10, 2022, Lender's predecessors -in -interest entered into a loan agreement (the “Loan”) for up to $3,262,500.00. (Complaint, ¶ 7.) The borrower executed a secured note (the “Note”) in which they agreed to pay the original lender the principa l amount of $3,262,500.00 plus interest, costs, and attorneys' fees. (Complaint, ¶ 8.) To secure payment under the Loan and Note, the borrower pledged to the original le...

5842 Results

Per page

Pages