Excerpt: ... now seek an o rder compelling GM to produce documents relating to (1) the SUBJECT Vehicle (RFP Nos. 1, 2, 3, 9, 14); (2) communications between Plaintiff and Defendant or those associated with Defendant (RFP Nos. 15 and 16); (3) documents relating to the call center, lo yalty program, after warrant assistance program, or technical hotline (RFP Nos. 31 -33); and (4) documents evidencing complaints made by California owners of the same make, model...

Excerpt: ...y generic and dev oid of specific explanations regarding the disputed requests. Indeed, the brief does not include or discuss the specific text of any of the 37 the requests at issue, instead grouping them into broad categories and then making general arguments about them. In addition, the brief contains no definition of the “transmission defect” and “engine defect” at issue, leaving it for the reply brief to define these terms. Even ...

Excerpt: ...t, but from the breach of the separate Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Agreement (“Noncompetition Agreement”) between the parties. Plaintiff argues that because the Noncompetition Agreement does not contain an arbitration clause, it cannot be compelled to arbitration. Defendant responds that the Employment Agreement and Noncompetition Agreement should be read as one, citing both Civ. Code § 1642 and Fillpoint, LLC v. Maas (2012) 208 Cal.A...

Excerpt: ...k to amend the c omplaint to add two new causes of action against defendants Suzanne Ramirez (Jonathan Ramirez's ex -fiancee) and RRT Group, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”): for financial elder abuse and for an accounting. Defendants respond that they “will not oppose” t his motion “with the following conditions”: (1) that Defendants not be required to file a response to the amended complaint; (2) that they be allowed to conduct ...

Excerpt: ...(“San Jose City”) (collectiv e l y, “City Defendants,”), and the County of Santa Clara (“Santa Clara County”) (collectively, “Defendants.”) Plaintiffs Valdez and Garrett were employed by Kiewit6 Infrastructure West Corporation (“Kiewit Corporation”) as Journeyman Pipe Fitters, working a t San Jose-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility (“Wastewater Facility.”) (FAC, ¶ 19.) The Wastewater Facility is jointly owned and op...

Excerpt: ..., 2022, and the y filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) on October 16, 2023. The FAC alleges in part that of the $623,300.00 currently owed to Plaintiffs: . . . $552,300 represents money Plaintiffs loaned to Defendant to assist in the purchase of two pieces of residential real property —one in the City of San Jose and one in the City of Palo Alto, as well as a small of amount of interest on one of those loans. Constituting t...

Excerpt: ...mplaint (“FAC”), ¶ 4.) Loren z is the Chief Executive Officer of County Hospital/SCVMC. (Id. at ¶¶ 2, 3(a).) During Plaintiff's employment, he observed County Hospital's failure to maintain a sanitary environment and improper handling of materials, including surgical instruments. (FA C, ¶ 11.) On and after September 2022, Plaintiff informed several people that certain instruments were incorrectly sterilized and had been incorrectly steril...

Excerpt: ...nts LLC (collectively, the “Gong Defendants”) in “multiple protracted complex litigations” involving residential property located at 2276 Bentley Ridge Drive in San Jose (the “Property”).1 (Complaint, ¶¶ 1, 9.) In 2015, Jason Pacheco and Shanna Pacheco (collectively, the “Pachecos”) sued the Gong Defendants over a dispute regarding the Property. (Complaint, ¶ 12 -14.) David Hamerslough represented the Pachecos in the underlying...

Excerpt: ...her responses to requests for production of documents, and (5) to compel compliance with requests for production of documents. In addition, Plaintiffs seek $7,429.00 in monetary sanctions against Surgicare. Because Plaintiffs' motion fails to demonstrate good cause for further responses to the document requests, and because the moving papers barely address the substance of the answers to the interrogatories, the court DENIES the motion in large p...

Excerpt: ...4.) Doe 6 was a teacher empl oyed by Doe 1 who abused his position of power to groom young students, including Plaintiff. (Id. at ¶ 15.) After Doe 6 gained Plaintiff's trust, his sexual advances against Plaintiff became more aggressive. (Compl., ¶ 16.) Doe 1's employees knew, or shou ld have known, that Doe 6 was sexually grooming and sexually abusing Plaintiff. (Id. at ¶¶ 18, 26.) Doe 6 targeted Plaintiff because of his gender. (Id. at ¶ 20...

Excerpt: ...ccording to the c omplaint, Xu has refused to contribute to the loan since January 2023, and Jiang has had to pay Xu's share of the loan. (Ibid.) In addition, despite verbal promises, Xu has refused to repay Jiang one -half of the advance payment and transaction fees. (Id . at ¶ 11.) Jiang incurred other expenses related to the Bowen Property, including property tax, insurance premiums, replacement of airconditioning system, gardener fees, repai...

Excerpt: ...2. (See complaint, ¶ 7.) Construction of the project was to be substantially completed by July 7, 2022. (See complaint, ¶ 8.) Plaintiffs contend that Premiere improperly over -excavated and demolished the base rock of an approved location of a 10,000 -gallon water tank with its foundation without notifying Plaintiffs, and the project ultimately was severely delayed and incomplete. (See complaint, ¶ 9.) Premiere stopped work and left the projec...

Excerpt: ...choscopy. (SA C ¶ 2.) While Dr. Nathan was under anesthesia, the anesthesiologist left him for crucial minutes, during which time the internist made a mistake, and Dr. Nathan suffered a stroke. (SAC ¶ 22.) Failing to detect the stroke, Stanford staff wrongly concluded t hat Dr. Nathan had suffered a heart attack and did not conduct a physical or neurological examination until 48 hours after the procedure. Dr. Nathan was released on March 16, 20...

Excerpt: ...er the name “ Findora.” In Case No. 20CV372622 (“Abittan”), Temujin alleges that Defendants and CrossComplainants Ariel Abittan, Benjamin Fisch, and Charles Lu conspired to: (a) assert a false claim of ownership of its business; (b) misappropriate its trade secrets; (c) usurp and interfere with control over its assets, such as social media accounts; and (d) interfere with its relationships with investors and business partners. Mr. Abittan...

Excerpt: ...on November 12, 2019 by plaintiffs Wendy Towner, Francisco Aguilera, Nick McFarland, Justin Bates, and Brynn OtaMatthews (collectively, the “Towner plaintiffs”). The Towner plaintiffs eventually filed a Fifth Amended Complaint (“5AC”) on July 23, 2021, stating several c auses of action against defendants Gilroy Garlic Festival Association, Inc. (“GGFA”), First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. (“First Alarm”), the City of Gilroy (“...

Excerpt: ...merger of Plaintiff with Tal amantez' Castling Kids Chess, and then the hiring of Talamantez as Plaintiff's Director of Enrichment. (See TAC, ¶¶ 28, 3738.) On May 14, 2018, Talamantez executed a nondisclosure agreement with Plaintiff, in which he agreed not to disclose Plaintiff's c onfidential information or solicit its customers and to return all property in his possession at the time of termination with Plaintiff. (See TAC, ¶ 49, exh. D.) ...

Excerpt: ...actions whe re there is a common question of law or fact pending in the same court. CCP §1048(a). In considering a motion for consolidation, the court should consider the timeliness of the motion, the complexity of the case, and prejudice. See State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1956) 47 C.2d 428, 430- 432. Jane Doe's motion is timely and the two actions concern the same property and involve overlapping parties. However, LHP 2019 wi...

Excerpt: ...e Fenton”). Pursuant t o California Rule of Court 3.1308, the Court issues its tentative ruling. I. Background This is an action for fraudulent conveyance. According to the allegations, on November 25, 2014, Martin and Hoge Fenton entered into an agreement in which Hoge Fento n agreed to represent Martin in an underlying action, which was a real property dispute between Martin's father and Mark and Paul Watts related to property located at 3156...

Excerpt: ...2024, in the principal amount of $ 894,443.54 that was modified on June 5, 2023, to $979,425.90, on two major grounds. First, Kokinos claimed that vacatur is required pursuant to “section 1286.2(a)(6)(B) because WELSH refused to honor KOKINOS's timely demands for disqualification of hersel f and of her designated forensic accountant Vanessa Hill (Hill), when WELSH was required to remove herself and the accountant from the proceedings” citin...

Excerpt: ...2023. It states four causes of action: (1) Nonpayment of Wages (against Flawless); (2) Breach of Contract (against Flawless and Flawless S.A.R.L.); (3) Violation of Business and Professions Code Section 17200 et seq. (against Flawless); and (4) Defamation (against Flawless an d Loughan). There are no exhibits attached to the complaint. Flawless filed an answer to the complaint on October 30, 2023. Currently before the court is a special motion t...

Excerpt: ...dariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83 (Armendariz). Perera alleges that FINRA has not complied with the holding in Armendariz that an employment arbitration must involve a neutral arbitrator and must not require the employee to pay any type of expense that he or she would not have to pay if the dispute had been brought in court rather than in arbitration. Perera alleges that FINRA has charged him thousands of dollars ...

Excerpt: ...mstances, a defend ant must bring a motion to vacate and set aside default within six months of the date the default was entered. Code of Civil Proc. § 473(b) provides, in pertinent part, that: (b) The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her l egal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect....

Excerpt: ...ant is served by e mail and the Plaintiff asserts that Defendant has agreed to such service. The proof of service form specifically required Plaintiff to provide the authorizing code section for its method of service and unsurprisingly, Plaintiff offered none. Moreover, the Court Clerk indicated that service was not proper when it rejected the request for entry of default on March 2, 2022, noting that service was not proper. Plaintiff claims it ...

Excerpt: ..., previ ously doing business as Lifestyle Hospitality Inc., provides case goods, seating, millwork, various types of furniture and related items and services to the hospitality industry. (Complaint, ¶¶2, 3, and 11.) Defendant ECD -Great Street DE, LLC dba theWit Ch icago (“Defendant”) has a principal place of business at 250 Parkway Drive, Suite 120, in Lincolnshire, Illinois. (Complaint, ¶4.) Defendant owns and/or operates one or more hot...

Excerpt: ...rtment between A ugust 25, 1997, and July 7, 2015. (Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication (“SSUMF”), ¶1.) She was promoted to senior accountant on June 30, 2014, and remained in that position until her retirement. (Id., ¶2.) As both an accountant and senior accountant, Defendant's responsibilities included maintaining Cupertino's general ledger accounts and performing bank ...