Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2462 Results

Location: San Mateo x
2023.05.25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 624
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...ority on this issue, and that the First Appellate District has recently held, in Dhital v. Nissan North America, Inc., 84 Cal.App.5th 828 (2022), that the economic loss rule does not bar fraudulent inducement claims based on concealment. Nonetheless, Defendant asserts that the Court should follow federal decisions, including Catherine Petersen v. FCA US LLC, No. CV 21-1386 OSF (EX), 2021 WL 3207960, at *5 (C.D. cal. July 8, 2021) and Tappana v. A...
2023.05.25 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 345
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...dwood City, CA, 94063, Courtroom 2B. Any party contesting this tentative ruling must also give notice to all other parties of the correct location for the hearing in case any party intends to appear in person. The Demurrer of Defendants Cenlar FSB ("Cenlar") and Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank") (collectively "Defendants") to the First Amended Complaint ("FAC") of Plaintiffs Christopher R. Dhillon and Marissa A. Dhillon ("Plaintiffs") is SUSTAINED IN P...
2023.05.25 Demurrer 353
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...fendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED pursuant to Cal. Evidence Code section 452(d). Defendants argue that the demurrer should be sustained on the ground that there is another achon pending between the same parties on the same cause of action, pursuant to Cal. Code of Civil Procedure Secton 430.10(c). In the related probate action, Case No. 23-PRO-00327, there are three causes of action for (1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Removal of T...
2023.05.24 Motion to Reopen Discovery 036
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.24
Excerpt: ...is due in November 2023, and the parties have declined to stipulate to any waiver of the five year dismissal statute. This is a motion for reconsideration in disguise. On August 17, 2022 this Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's moton to continue the trial (which was granted) and Defendants' motion to continue all pretrial dates and deadlines, to be calculated based upon the new trial date, which was denied. The Court found "No good cause for cont...
2023.05.24 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 464
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.24
Excerpt: ...$25,000, Plaintiff will need to formally serve the Amended Complaint on Defendant, which would re-open Defendant's default. (See 3-21-22 Order denying Plaintiff's "Application to Amend the Complaint."); see also The Rutter Group: unlawful Detainer Complaint, Cal. Prac. Guide Landlord-Tenant Ch. 8-8, Sect. 8:498 ("An amended complaint making substantive changes in effect "opens" existing defaults: All defendants, even those currently in default un...
2023.05.24 Demurrer 310
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.24
Excerpt: ...ional Tort and "Discriminated Against as a Member of an underrepresented Group" are attached. However, the only attachments to the Complaint are documents showing a hotel reservation, and a police report. The checked boxes and attachments are insufficient to show what causes of action are alleged so that Defendant may prepare a defense. The Demurrer to each cause of action is therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend for uncertainty pursuant to Cal...
2023.05.22 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena 913
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.05.22
Excerpt: ...ment Debtor VITALY GOLOMB concedes belong to him, his wife Kateryna Mamyko-Golomb, and Golomb Solet Capital. Judgment Debtor Golomb concedes that he was CEO and "owner" of TIME TRAVELLER. If that is true, then money transfers to his wife and to Golomb Solet-i Capital raise questions about their propriety, especially since at least some of the transfers occurred after this lawsuit was filed. To determine whether the transfers were fraudulent for t...
2023.05.22 Motion for Summary Judgment 057
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.05.22
Excerpt: ...and Reply briefs, and considers them timely. Facts. This is a residential unlawful detainer (UD) case. The allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint appear to be undisputed. As alleged, on 12-6-23, Plaintiff served Defendant with a Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Vacate. Defendant was two months behind in her rent payments at this time, having failed to pay rent for both November and December, 2023. On 12- 9-23, the Three-Day Notice expired. After the...
2023.05.22 Demurrer to FAC 582
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.05.22
Excerpt: ...D as to exhibits A—B attached to the April 7, 2023 Declaration of Jason George and DE-NIED as to exhibits C—H. A hearing was held November 7, 2022, at which the Court continued the hearing to May 22, 2023, and permitted the parties to file supplemental briefing. The Court has considered the supplemental briefing and issues this modified tentative ruling. Defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") demurs to the First Amended Complaint (the "FAC") o...
2023.05.22 Demurrer 937
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.05.22
Excerpt: ...an Carlos, CA. Plaintiffs allege breach of contract of a February 23, 2022 written agreement between Plaintiffs Riley Russell and Tomoko Russell as sellers to Defendant Akaal LLC as buyer for a sales price of $2,100,000 with a leaseback provision, an initial deposit amount of $63,000 within 3 days of acceptance, with the balance due March 8, 2022, and a 90 day lease back. Plaintiffs also allege a cause of action for fraud against Defendants Sarbd...
2023.05.19 Demurrer to SAC 470
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.19
Excerpt: ...r to the Second Amended Cross-complaint no later than ten (10) days after service of written notice of this order. Plaintiff and Cross-defendant Open Text Inc. (hereafter "Open Text") demurs to the Fifth and Ninth Causes of Acton set forth the Second Amended Cross-complaint (the "SAX") pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e), on the grounds that neither count states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. A. ...
2023.05.19 Motion for Attorney Fees 406
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.19
Excerpt: ...for Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability under the Song-Beverly Act and Fourth Cause of Action for Violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act ("CLRA"). (Conn Decl., Exh. A.) The Song-Beverly Act provides that "[ilf the buyer prevails in an action under this section, the buyer shall be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of costs and expenses, including attorney's fees based on ac...
2023.05.19 Motion to Bifurcate Trial of Issues 973
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.19
Excerpt: ... in this case. Defendant notes that the apportionment of liability among Defendant Ross, Defendant Graves, and Plaintiff is disputed. Therefore, according to Defendant, "apportionment of fault in the liability portion of the case is a preliminary determination that will promote trial efficiency and economy, apprising each party of the need (or lack thereof) to call damages experts, including multiple physicians—most with active clinical practic...
2023.05.19 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 786
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.19
Excerpt: ...nce are OVERRULED. This lemon law action relates to Plaintiff's 2020 Honda Pilot, purchased new from Honda of Serramonte in Colma, CA on December 13, 2019. Defendant AHM here moves to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration provision in the "Retail Installment Sale Contract— Simple Finance Charge (With Arbitration Provision)" ("Sales Contract"), and to stay the action. Equitable Estoppel Defendant argues that it is entitled to compel arbi...
2023.05.19 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 038
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.19
Excerpt: ...or Judicial Notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code Sect. 452(d)). Plaintiff's 5-12- 23 Request for Judicial Notice is GRAN ED. (Evid. Code Sect. 452(c)). Plaintiff's 5-12-23 Objections to the Ivar, Dawn, & Patrick Fluharty Decls. are OVERRULED on grounds the objections are immaterial to the Court's ruling on the Motion. Further, these objections would go to the weight of this evidence, not its admissibility. Background. This is a dispute involving neighb...
2023.05.18 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 789
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...ional infliction of emotional distress. Defendants' Mohon for Summary Adjudication is DENIED as to Plaintiff's remaining claims for the reasons set forth below. Statute of Limitations — Relation Back Doctrine Defendants contend, first, that Plaintiff's causes of action are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. Defendants cite Scherer v. Mark (1976) 64 Cal. App 3d 834, 842 for the rule that "Where no effort has been made to alle...
2023.05.18 Motion for Reconsideration 546
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...ault and Default Judgment, is ruled upon as set forth below. The Court agrees to reconsider the Feb. 9, 2023 Order and has considered Plaintiff's opposing arguments. "Reconsidering" the Feb. 9 ruling does not mean changing the result. It means the Court believes Plaintiff has satisfied Sect. 1008's requirements for the Court to reconsider its prior ruling. (See Corns v. Miller (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 195, 202 [reconsidering a prior ruling does not ...
2023.05.18 Demurrer to SAC 521
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.18
Excerpt: ...t as set forth below. A. Second Cause of Action — Interference with Contract Sustained with leave to amend. For delayed discovery to apply, the plaintiff must plead and prove that "a reasonable investigation at that time would not have revealed a factual basis for that particular cause of action." (Fox v. Ethicon Endo-surgery, Inc. (2W5) 35 Cal.4th 797, 803.) The SAC does not meet this requirement. Paragraph 13 alleges that Plaintiff discovered...
2023.05.12 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 362
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.12
Excerpt: ... Legal Standard on Request to File Untimely Compulsory Crosscomplaint When a defendant fails to file a compulsory cross-complaint at the time of filing its answer, a court must grant the defendant leave to belatedly file the cross-complaint as long as the defendant has acted in good faith and provided notice to the other parties. (Code of Civ. Proc., S 426.50.) A strong showing, consisting of substantial evidence of a defendant's bad faith, is re...
2023.05.11 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 600
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.11
Excerpt: .... Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. S437c(p)(1). When the moving party has met its burden, the burden shifts to the opposing party to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact as to the cause of action, or a defense to the cause of action. ld. Here, Plaintiff moves for summary judgment and/or summary adjudication of the First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract, Second Cause of Acton for Money Lent, and Third Cause of Action for Money Had a...
2023.05.09 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 600
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.09
Excerpt: ...END as to all asserted causes of action. Cal. Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subd. (e). Defendants' March 20, 2023 Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Cal. Evid. Code, S 452, subd. (d). The Court takes judicial notice of the documents attached to the Declaration of Susan K. Riggio, but does not take judicial notice of the truth of statements or allegations therein. Applicable legal principles In reviewing a demurrer, the Court assumes that all pr...
2023.05.08 Motion to Compel Further Responses 892
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.05.08
Excerpt: ...d Guang Dai's Motion to Compel Defendant Mavrik Construction & Development, Inc.'s Further Responses and Requests for Sanction is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART for the reasons set forth below. Defendant Mavrik Construction & Development, Inc. ("Mavrik") shall provide further responses to Form Interrogatories no. 324.1, Special Interrogatories nos. 1, 3, & 5—8, and Requests for Production nos. 1, 4— 5, & 8—14 no later than thirty (30) d...
2023.05.08 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 412
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.05.08
Excerpt: ...apers prove each element of the causes of action, and the opposing papers fail to raise a triable issue of material fact as to any element of either cause of action or as to any affirmative defense. l. OBJECTIONS has asserted 37 pages of 52 objections to various matters, most of which are innocuous, having no bearing on the issues. On the subject of "inconsequential written evidentiary objections, without focusing on those that are critical," the...
2023.05.08 Demurrer 315
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.05.08
Excerpt: ...of Plaintiffs Opposition, filed untimely on May 1, 2023, have not been considered. While the Opposition indicates that the parties have agreed to a continuance of this hearing, no justification has been provided for the late-filed Opposition, and a continuance is not conducive to the Court's impacted calendar. Defendants' Demurrer is OVERRULED. Plaintiff's Complaint is based upon a Three-Day Notice to Quit, which states that Defendants permitted ...
2023.05.05 Motion to Release Mechanic's Lien 754
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.05
Excerpt: ...ectronic bookmarks with links to the first page of each exhibit and with bookmark titles that identify the exhibit or letter and briefly describe the exhibit"); San Mateo County Superior Court Local Rule 3.3 (same).) "Rules of Court have the force of law and are as binding as procedural statutes as long as they are not inconsistent with statutory or constitutional law." (R.R. v. Superior Court (2009) 180 Cal.App.4th 185, 205.) Plaintiff's Opposin...

2462 Results

Per page

Pages