Excerpt: ...Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that ...

Excerpt: ...ment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act. Plaintiff failed to file a FEHA charge within one year of the incident and therefore defendant contends she has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. KB Home noticed the depositions of two workers compensation attorneys who represented plaintiff after the assault. The depositions were taken, but as stated in the moving Memorandum, defendant "...was unable to explore the communications betwe...

Excerpt: ... Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that...

Excerpt: ...nt 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has n...

Excerpt: ... Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that...

Excerpt: ...Appearance Required” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voi...

Excerpt: .... The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk...

Excerpt: ...ent 53 Zoom ID is:841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has n...

Excerpt: ...Required” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is:841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message t...

Excerpt: ...is:841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opp...

Excerpt: ...epartment 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that i...

Excerpt: ...: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the oppo...

Excerpt: ...ply to “Appearance Required” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall l...

Excerpt: ...ters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the c...

Excerpt: ...d” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advi...

Excerpt: .... The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk...

Excerpt: ...ired” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to a...

Excerpt: ...oom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified...

Excerpt: ...e Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk tha...

Excerpt: ...ppearance Required” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voic...

Excerpt: ...Appearance Required” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voi...

Excerpt: ...ters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is:841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, te requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the cle...

Excerpt: ...ers. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the cl...

Excerpt: ...ment 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has...

Excerpt: ...d” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advi...

Excerpt: ...rtment 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it h...

Excerpt: ... The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk ...

Excerpt: ...t 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has no...

Excerpt: ...oom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified...

Excerpt: ...equired” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message t...

Excerpt: ...ers. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the cl...

Excerpt: ...om ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified ...

Excerpt: ...pearance Required” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice...

Excerpt: ... 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has not...

Excerpt: ...Required” matters. The Department 53 Zoom ID is: 841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message ...

Excerpt: ... 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing ...

Excerpt: ...B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to...

Excerpt: ...gument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear and b) that opposing par...

Excerpt: ...Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) ...

Excerpt: ...ID is:841 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the ...

Excerpt: ...tent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the foll...

Excerpt: ...ng oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear and b) that op...

Excerpt: ...esting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear and b) tha...

Excerpt: ...ocal Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) i...

Excerpt: ...1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intenti...

Excerpt: ...ny party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appe...

Excerpt: ...uesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear and b) th...

Excerpt: ...y requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear and ...

Excerpt: ...06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention...

Excerpt: ...ocal Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party must advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear and...

Excerpt: ...l Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party must advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear and b)...

Excerpt: ...l Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its ...

Excerpt: ...1 204 6267. Consistent with Local Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing...

Excerpt: ...y requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear and ...

Excerpt: ...cal Rule 1.06(B), any party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) it...

Excerpt: ... party requesting oral argument on any matter on this calendar must comply with the following procedure. To request oral argument, you must call the Department 53 clerk at (916) 874‐ 7858 and opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. At the time of requesting oral argument, the requesting party shall leave a voice message to advise the clerk that it has notified the opposing party of the following: a) its intention to appear...

Excerpt: ...IRED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. Plaintiff Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.'s (“Plaintiff”) motion to enter judgment pursuant to terms of settlemen...

Excerpt: ...RED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. Plaintiff Discover Bank's (“Plaintiff”) motion to enter judgment pursuant to terms of settlement pursuant to CC...

Excerpt: ...�APPEARANCE REQUIRED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. Plaintiff Paramvir Sahota, M.D.'s (“Plaintiff”) motion to compel defendant California Departme...

Excerpt: ...UIRED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. Defendant Jason Fong, as Trustee of the Samuel B. Fong Trust and as Executor of the Estate of Samuel B. Fong's (t...

Excerpt: ...EARANCE REQUIRED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. Plaintiff Holy Trinity Orthodox Tewahedo Church's (“Plaintiff” or “Holy Trinity”) motion for p...

Excerpt: ...PLY TO “APPEARANCE REQUIRED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. Defendant Keith Hughes, M.D. moves for summary judgment of Plaintiff Terri Castle's cause...

Excerpt: ... APPLY TO “APPEARANCE REQUIRED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. This matter was continued from February 21, 2020, to today's date, to permit defendant...

Excerpt: ...�APPEARANCE REQUIRED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. Defendant County of Sacramento moves for summary judgment of the three causes alleged against it i...

Excerpt: ...NCE REQUIRED” MATTERS. INDIGENT LITIGANTS MAY CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING TO ARRANGE FOR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE. ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS REGARDING COURT CALL OR A CALL‐IN APPEARANCE SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE CLERK IN DEPT. 53 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE COURT DAY BEFORE THE HEARING. Plaintiff Stacey Claire Leach moves for an order quashing Defendant LiebherrAmerica, Inc.'s subpoenas to C...

Excerpt: ...ely, (2) to remand to the arbitrator with instructions that California Restaurant Mutual Benefit Corporation v. Gold Country Foods, Inc., American Arbitration Association case number 01‐18‐0004‐ 7001, be dismissed without prejudice and/or the award vacated without prejudice. On November 15, 2016, CRMBC's Board of Trustees voted to implement an assessment for fiscal years 2005 through 2015. CRMBC thereby levied the approved assessment amount...

Excerpt: ...o Plaintiff in the cannabis industry. The CSA provides that any controversy between the parties “involving the construction or application of any provision of” the agreement shall be resolved by binding arbitration with JAMS. Plaintiff's causes of action for breach of contract, etc. all relate to the construction and/or application of the CSA. A written agreement to submit a controversy to arbitration is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable co...

Excerpt: ... complaint. According to the moving papers Defendant Reliance was served through an agent for service of process that who was no longer its agent at the time. It indicated that it only learned of the lawsuit when its insurance carrier contacted it. (Deol Decl. ¶¶ 4‐6.) As to Defendant Mathew Wolfe, he declares that while he used the subject address where he was purportedly served as a residence (homeless shelter), he was never served with the...

Excerpt: ...amed Defendants Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., House of Blues Concerts, Inc., Ace of Spades, LLC, and Ace of Spades as Defendants. Plaintiff alleges that he was assaulted by Defendant Mike Ness, the lead singer of the band. He alleges that security personnel employed by Defendants restrained him and assaulted him as well. At issue on this motion are Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's form interrogatories. All four Defendants responded to the ...

Excerpt: ...aw case, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion to compel further responses to requests for production Nos. 2, 6, 8, 9, 12‐16, 21, 24, 26, 29, 32, 34, 37, 40, 42, 45, 48, 50 and 65. The Court ordered Defendant to provide further responses no later than February 14, 2020. The Court's order also indicated that documents asserted to be confidential, proprietary, and/or trade secret shall be produced subject to a stipulated protective order. Plaintif...

Excerpt: ...ble to depose this witness but has not moved for a continuance under CCP 437c(h). Plaintiff's FAC alleges the following causes of action arising out of her employment with CHP commencing in 2007 and ending with her termination in 2016: 1st cause of action Discrimination based on Disability (FEHA), 2nd cause of action Failure to Accommodate (FEHA), 3rd cause of action Failure to Enter into the Interactive Process (FEHA) and 4th cause of action for...

Excerpt: ...ethod of resolving wage claims.” (Cuadra v. Millan (1998) 17 Cal.4th 855, 858.) Pleadings are limited to a complaint and answer. There is no discovery process. (Labor Code § 98, subd. (d).) Technical rules of evidence do not apply, and all relevant evidence is admitted “if it is the sort of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs.” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 13502.) Either party may ...

Excerpt: ...lated contracts were signed in Sacramento before a notary. Plaintiff demurs to the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth affirmative defenses on the grounds each fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a defense and fails to specify whether the contract or agreement referenced in the affirmative defense is a written or verbal contract. Plaintiff contends the affirmative defenses at issue all rely on a series of verbal representat...

Excerpt: ...Tutto's motion, Hot Italian raised the argument that Tutto lacked the capacity to participate in this action because its current entity status is “FTB Suspended.” The California Secretary of State's online business portal did, at the time the opposition was filed, reflect that Tutto's status as “FTB Suspended.” (Hot Italian's RJN Exh. H.) California law provides that if a corporation fails to pay taxes, penalties, interests, or any liabil...

Excerpt: ...ections to Cal Casualty's first set of written discovery, including special interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and form interrogatories. (ROA 7.) Dixon was ordered to serve the responses no later than December 31, 2019. Dixon has failed to comply with the Court orders and Cal Casualty now moves for terminating sanctions. For misuse of the discovery process, including as is the case here, disobeying a court order to provide dis...

Excerpt: ... residence during his eviction the previous day. The incident occurred on November 28, 2012. Plaintiffs are decedent's wife, Tina Marcum, and son, Roy Steven Marcum. Plaintiffs' complaint was filed on November 25, 2014, and alleges causes of action for wrongful death on behalf of each of the Plaintiffs against defendants Joseph Francis Corey, Citibank, Tracy Ramirez, Sal Ramirez, and Does 1 through XX, inclusive. (ROA 1.) On June 7, 2017, Plainti...

Excerpt: ... February 20, 2020 hearing date is repeated below. Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas issued by defendant to Sutter Medical Foundation and Kaiser Permanente seeking plaintiff Alicia Tutt's medical records is granted. Plaintiffs seek damages for alleged personal injuries arising out of extensive mold found in their residence after the purchase. The defendant was the seller's realtor who readied the home for sale after the home was ci...

Excerpt: ...ara Lovenstein, by and through her successor‐in‐interest Robin Hutcheson, and Jean Charles' (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) “motion to resolve the issue of disqualification” is ruled upon as follows. This motion involves Plaintiffs' counsel, the Law Office, Ed Dudensing attorney‐at‐law (“TLO”) and TLO's hiring of Margaret Mallough as a legal secretary. TLO has hired Ms. Mallough, but she has not yet started working at TLO. TLO in...

Excerpt: ... The litigation coordinator shall provide the tentative ruling to plaintiff Silus Mardel Valson. Appearance is required on March 12, 2020. Plaintiff shall be available, by COURTCALL, to participate in oral argument on the continuance date. Plaintiff Silus Mardel Valson's (“Plaintiff”) motion to set aside and vacate the judgment sustaining defendant's demurrer pursuant to CCP § 663 is DROPPED. On December 6, 2019, this Court sustained defenda...

Excerpt: ...ituted as Plaintiff in November 2017. Jody Parks passed away on March 17, 2019 and Casey Darr, the son of George and Jody Parks was substituted in as he successor in interest on October 17, 2019. The order granting the motion to substitute successor in interest stated that Nate Parks was also a successor in interest and that he agreed in his declaration to the substitution of Mr. Darr as "the" successor in interest. (Minute order October 17, 2019...

Excerpt: ...ancy; (3) failure to prevent discrimination; (4) failure to accommodate; (5) failure to engage in the interactive process; (6) retaliation; (7) wrongful termination in violation of public policy; (8) violation of Labor Code § 1197.5; and (9) defamation. Defendants have presented evidence that on March 8, 2018, Plaintiff Tiffany Kamerman‐Kretzmer, D.O., a physician, ("Plaintiff') and Pediatrix Medical Group of California, A.P.C. ("Pediatrix") a...

Excerpt: ...ty against Defendant Anu Arora ("Arora"). On January 27, 2020, following the granting of the motion for summary judgment, the Court entered the judgment in the amount of $128,198.95 for plaintiff against defendants. The order stated in part that "Plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to attorney's fees and costs in an amount according to proof as allowed by law." (See ROA 43 and 44) Pursuant to the order finding plaintiff to be the pr...

Excerpt: ...ise its discretion and control over all proceedings relating to the litigation before it." (Johnson v. Banducci (1963) 212 Cal. App. 2d 254, 260) and thus retains discretion to continue hearings on motions, if it is based on a reasoned judgment (Forthmann v. Boyer (2002) 97 Cal. App. 4th 977, 984). Self‐represented Plaintiff Christopher Gustard filed a complaint for “declaratory and injunctive relief.” The gist of the complaint is premised ...

Excerpt: ...e Court issued a further minute order on January 14, 2020, again continuing this matter on the Court's own motion to March 10, 2020, and again ordering the parties to appear before Judge Davidian in the Settlement Department to address the issues raised by this motion. The parties were ordered to appear on February 19, 2020. The parties appeared before Judge Davidian in the Settlement Department on February 19, 2020, but were unable to settle the...

Excerpt: ...yee pressure washing the entrance area at the front of the Winco store. After her fall she reported her fall to Winco and a Winco employee took a report. CityWide propounded a request for production of documents on Winco requesting surveillance videos and documents related to Plaintiff including any statements made by Plaintiff and any reports made by Winco. Winco agreed to produce a video and a photo in response to RFP 1. As to the other request...

Excerpt: ... they were deposed between April and June 2016 and because the depositions would be duplicative. Generally, once any party has taken the deposition of any natural person, including that of a party to the action, neither the party who gave nor any other party who received notice of the deposition may take a subsequent deposition of that deponent without leave of court. Pursuant to CCP § 2025.450(a), where a deposition notice has been properly ser...

Excerpt: ...set forth in the ruling, the proof of service on the motion indicated that Defendant unsuccessfully attempted to personally serve Plaintiff [counsel's office] on November 27, 2020 and plaintiff was served by mail and email that same day. The Court noted that there was no notice in the Court's file indicating that any party agreed to accept service electronically but even if there were, service of the motion on November 27, 2019 was only 76 days b...

Excerpt: ...on as required by CCP 430.41. The First Amended Complaint ("FAC") alleges that in April 2018, Mr. Gadbois and South Coast Heliocopters ("SCH") entered into an employment contract in which Mr. Gadbois agreed to perform services for SCH as a helicopter pilot and general manager in return for compensation in the form of wages and benefits. In late April 2018, SCH entered into a contract with CalFire through which SCH agreed to provide aerial support...

Excerpt: .... Arnold are sustained. The Court notes that even if the objected to evidence was considered, it would not alter the Court's analysis. This action arises from injuries that plaintiffs Inessa Bailey (“Bailey”) and Fitchie allegedly received as a result of a traffic collision that occurred at the intersection of 19 th Street and Q Street in Sacramento on July 19, 2017, at approximately 5:00 p.m. Plaintiff Bailey has dismissed her Complaint agai...

Excerpt: ...ed settlement in a class action is fair. (Rebney v. Wells Fargo Bank (1990) 220 Cal. App. 3rd 1117, 1138.) The law favors settlement, particularly in class actions and other complex cases where substantial resources can be conserved by avoiding the time, cost, and rigors of formal litigation. (See Newberg on Class Actions 4th (4th ed. 2002) § 11.41 (and cases cited therein); Class Plaintiffs v. City of Seattle (9th Cir. 1992) 955 F.2d 1268, 1276...

Excerpt: ... for Department 53 of the Sacramento County Superior Court is 813 6th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. Defendants shall notify Plaintiffs immediately. Additionally, the notice of motion does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 1.06(D). Defendants are ordered to notify Plaintiffs immediately of the tentative ruling system and to be available at the hearing, in person or by telephone, in the even...

Excerpt: ... public property while closing part of a roadway while a CDCR inmate crew worked on the sides of the road to perform weed abatement. Officer Nader Saca was supervising the crew at the time. Plaintiff Maria Luisa Hills walked on foot on the roadway, where she was subsequently struck by a car driven by Defendant Carolyn Vodoklys. Both the CDCR and the City claim the other party was responsible for providing traffic control at the scene of the accid...

Excerpt: ...mproperly deducted amounts from his commissions, failed to provide him commissions on certain jobs, and failed to provide him information to verify GCCR's commission totals. Plaintiff's commissions were based upon a percentage of the approved costs covered by the insurance companies, minus rebates and credits offered by plaintiff to induce homeowners to enter into the contract. For the third time, Plaintiff seeks further responses and production ...

Excerpt: ...which defendant DGS leased property located at 9855 Compagnoni Street, Bakersfield, California from Bakersfield CHP LP ("Lease"). Bakersfield CHP, LP, as owner and lessor, was to contract for the development of certain improvements on the property in accordance with the "Facility Design Program" and "Outline Specifications" provided by DGS and attached as exhibits to the Lease. CHP would occupy the improved property, paying lease payments beginni...

Excerpt: ...imum wages, failing to provide compliant meal period and rest periods and associated premium pay, failing to timely pay wages during employment and upon termination of employment, failing to provide compliant wage statements, failing to maintain requisite payroll records, and failing to reimburse necessary business expenses, and thereby engaged in unfair business practices under California Business and Professions Code section 17200, et seq. Plai...

Excerpt: ...he first cause of action alleges (premises liability) in pertinent part, "Plaintiff was lawfully on Defendants' premises, located at or about 4401 Broadway, Sacramento, California 95817, when suddenly and without notice, Plaintiff slipped and fell on an liquid substance, believed to have been a raw egg, that presented a dangerous condition. ..." (Id. p. 4). The Court very reluctantly has considered Plaintiff John Cooks' opposition to the motion f...

Excerpt: ...iability) in pertinent part, "Plaintiff was lawfully on Defendants' premises, located at or about 4401 Broadway, Sacramento, California 95817, when suddenly and without notice, Plaintiff slipped and fell on an liquid substance, believed to have been a raw egg, that presented a dangerous condition. ..." (Id. p. 4). The Court very reluctantly considered Plaintiff John Cooks' opposition to the motion filed only six court days prior to the hearing an...

Excerpt: ...rters. On February 21, 2020, this Court denied Plaintiff's motion to compel CDCR's further responses to certain Requests for Production seeking “Print‐outs of any and all CMS entries for Office of Internal Affairs Case No. H‐OIA‐ 005‐16‐A” and “Print‐outs of any and all CMS entries for Office of Internal Affairs Case No. H‐SEC‐003‐ 17‐D.” These are both investigations into Plaintiff. The Court denied the motion only on...

Excerpt: ...ligent misrepresentation, cancellation of a voidable contract, violation of Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, intentional misrepresentation, violation of Civil Code § 3294(c)(3), violation of Civil Code §§ 2924.12 and 2924.17, cancellation of written instruments, slander of title, quiet title, declaratory relief and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs allege that they obtained a mortgage from Paul Financial, LLC on March 20 2007 in the amount of $546,850....

Excerpt: .... CSC alleged that GSOP breached a construction contract by not having adequate plans, failed to complete change orders, used unlicensed contractors, interfered with its performance and diverted work and payment to unlicensed contractors. (Comp. p.3 ¶ BC‐2.) CSC also alleged that GSOP breached the contract by failing to arbitrate the dispute pursuant to the provision in the contract requiring AAA mediation and them arbitration. (Comp. p.4 ¶ B...