Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

6288 Results

Location: Sacramento x
2023.02.15 Motion to Compel Further Responses 029
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.15
Excerpt: ...ow of Gary Cannon (the “Decedent”) alleged that the medical treatment administered to the Decedent by numerous Defendants including Defendant David Smith, M.D., resulted in the Decedent's death. By way of the instant motion, Defendant seeks to compel Plaintiff to provide responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Six, Nos. 78-89 and Requests for Production of Documents, Set Four, Nos. 38-40 that seek information regarding Plaintiff's income an...
2023.02.15 Demurrer 235
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.15
Excerpt: ...Ins. Fund (1997) 54 Cal.App.4th 216, 219; Nordlinger v. Lynch (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 1259, 1271.) A demurrer “tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters.” (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) “If the complaint states a cause of action under any theory, regardless of the title under which the factual basis for relief is stated, that aspect of the complaint is good against demurrer." (Que...
2023.02.15 Motion for Summary Adjudication 221
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.15
Excerpt: ...in part, and denied, in part. The Court declines to rule on Defendants' objections as they were immaterial to the determination of this motion. Background This action involves a challenge by various Plaintiffs to regulations adopted by OSFM establishing certification requirements for persons to become “Certified Fire Sprinkler Fitters” for the installation of water-based fire protection systems (the “Regulations”). The Legislature authori...
2023.02.14 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 503
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...es out of plaintiff's employment as a “porter” with UBM. Hired in May 2017, plaintiff generally alleges she was discriminated against on account of her disability and retaliated against for “whistleblowing,” ultimately being “wrongfully discharged” in April 2021. Her complaint purports to assert against UBM and other individuals associated with UBM causes of action for discrimination, failure to prevent discrimination, failure to enga...
2023.02.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 220
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...y” that is cited. Defendant Morton Gold LLC's (“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication, is GRANTED as follows. The Court notes that Plaintiff's opposition brief requests the Court to disregard the documents submitted by Defendant in its request for judicial notice, which consist of prior complaints filed by Plaintiff in unrelated cases. The Court has not considered this evidence in its ruling, and th...
2023.02.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 892
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...for and was issued a credit card by Plaintiff pursuant to a written agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, Defendant agreed that use of the credit card constituted acceptance of the agreement. The agreement obligated Plaintiff to pay vendors for charges made by Defendant, and for Defendant to periodically repay Plaintiff the amount paid to the vendors plus interest as it accrued. Defendant made charges on the account and Plaintiff complied ...
2023.02.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 979
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...which of moving defendant's 14 Undisputed Material Facts will be addressed at the hearing and the parties should be prepared to point to specific evidence which is claimed to show the existence or non-existence of a triable issue of material fact. *** Moving counsel failed to comply with CRC Rule 3.1350(g), which requires a single volume of evidence (including declarations) with a table of contents when the evidence exceeds 25 pages. Factual Back...
2023.02.14 Demurrer to SAC, Motion to Request Equitable Relief from Judgment 266
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...rocedural History This action concerns Plaintiff's medical records regarding his placement on a 5150 hold in November of 2016 after he presented at the UC Davis Medical Center emergency department complaining of heart palpitations. This is the second of three actions that Plaintiff has filed against Defendant. In the first action (Sacramento County Court Case No. 34-2019-00267042), Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that he was falsely imprisoned by ...
2023.02.14 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 676
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...ng counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom. Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.'s (“Defendant”) motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is DENIED as follows. Background Plaintiff Juana E. Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) filed this lemon law action on March 2, 2020 and alleged five causes of action under the Song-Beverly Act, one cause of action under the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, an...
2023.02.14 Motion to Compel Further Responses 720
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...e ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06. Moving counsel is directed to contact opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom. Plaintiffs filed the underlying complaint in this case on January 10, 2022 against Defendants ...
2023.02.14 Motion to Compel Mental Exam, for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 715
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...posing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom or by telephone. Plaintiffs' counsel failed to comply with CRC Rule 3.1113(f), requiring that memorandum of points & authorities which exceeds 10 pages include a table of contents and ...
2023.02.14 Writ of Possession 999
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...ROPPED from calendar due to defective service of notice which deprives the Court of jurisdiction to consider this matter. (Lee v. Placer Title Co. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 503, 509-511.) Plaintiff's notice of application does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06, and does not provide the correct address for Dept. 53/54. (Provided that plaintiff file at or before the hearing on this application pro...
2023.02.14 Motion to Compel Further Responses 288
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.14
Excerpt: ...party of the specific discovery requests that will be addressed at the hearing. The parties are also reminded that pursuant to local rules, only limited oral argument is permitted on law and motion matters. *** Factual Background This action arises out of a 2016 transaction whereby plaintiffs sold a residential care facility to defendants. Plaintiffs generally allege that defendants have breached the contract and engaged in other wrongful conduct...
2023.02.09 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 775
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...request for admissions to Defendant Keisha Myers were deemed admitted on December 9, 2020. When the moving party is the plaintiff, there is only one ground for a motion for judgment on the pleadings: "the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause or causes of action against the defendant and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint." (C.C.P. 438(c)(1)(A).) The grounds for the motion shall a...
2023.02.09 Demurrer 386
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...l (833) 568-8864 and enter the Zoom ID: 16146506749. Defendants J. Lynch and A. Swinney, Jr.'s (collectively, “Defendants”) demurrer to incarcerated plaintiff in pro per Allen Hammler's (“Plaintiff”) Complaint is UNOPPOSED and SUSTAINED with leave to amend. The notice of motion does not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system, as required by Local Rule 1.06. Moving counsel is directed to contact Plaintiff and advise him of L...
2023.02.09 Demurrer to FAC 102
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...n for Judgment on the Pleadings, Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and Judgment of Dismissal in the matter of Ghulam v. Aalemkhiel et al., Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2016- 00199650 is unopposed and granted. Factual and Procedural Background In 2016, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant in the matter of Ghulam v. Aalemkhiel et al., Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2016-00199650 (the “Prior ...
2023.02.09 Motion for Attorney Fees 795
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...vehicle. Kia also agreed to pay Plaintiff's attorney fees, costs and expenses pursuant to Civil Code § 1794(d). Plaintiff seeks $295,874.92 which represents: (1) $165,739 in fees for Strategic Legal Practices, APC (“SLP”); (2) $17,355 in fees for California Consumer Attorneys (“CCA”); (3) a 1.35 multiplier enhancement in the amount of $64,075.90; (4) $45,225.02 in costs and expenses; and (4) $3,500 in fees for reviewing the opposition, d...
2023.02.09 Motion to Compel Further Responses 414
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...st set of Special Interrogatories, numbers 1 and 2, is ruled upon as follows. Angel filed separate motions for each set of discovery, which is preferred by the Court, but the Court will address both motions herein. The Court also notes Angel filed the same points and authorities for both motions, while Polaris filed an omnibus opposition brief to both motions. Angel has indicated the incorrect address in its notice of motion. The correct address ...
2023.02.09 Motion for Summary Judgment 900
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...ises from the chiropractic care and treatment provided by Plaintiff by Defendant at The Joint Chiropractic's Natomas location on January 5, 2022. Plaintiff alleges she sustained injuries during the chiropractic treatment. Defendant moves for summary judgment on the grounds: (1) Defendant did not breach the applicable standard of care regarding Plaintiff; and (2) did not, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, proximately cause or contribu...
2023.02.09 Motion to Compel Arbitration 980
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...dant as Mami Group, Inc. dba MGI Motors. Factual and Procedural Background This action involves the purchase and sale of a used vehicle. Plaintiff Nicholas Tinney (“Plaintiff”) filed his Complaint on March 17, 2022, alleging the following five causes of action: (1) intentional misrepresentation; (2) negligent misrepresentation; (3) violation of Business & Professions Code § 17200; (4) bond claim; and (5) violation of the Consumer Legal Remed...
2023.02.09 Motion to Require Production of Peace Officer Records 987
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...laintiff alleges causes of action for excessive force, false arrest, violation of the Bane Act in Civil Code § 51.7, assault and battery, and negligence. The complaint arises from an interaction between Plaintiff and Mullin and Wright on March 10, 2020 when Plaintiff was celebrating his birthday with a friend at a restaurant. Plaintiff alleges the deputies were looking for a fugitive who was 20 years older, seven inches taller and fifty pounds l...
2023.02.09 Motion to Sequence Discovery, for Protective Order 181
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...015.5. However, Plaintiff's counsel submitted what appear to be corrected versions of the declarations on February 6, 2023. In any event, the Court need not rule on any evidentiary objections in this discovery motion. The objected to declarations simply set forth Plaintiff's contentions regarding meet and confer efforts or lack thereof, and as seen below none of that is material to ultimate outcome of this motion. In this employment action Plaint...
2023.02.09 Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award 177
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.09
Excerpt: ...rm the same award which Simple Foods seeks to vacate. The dispute between the parties arose from shipments of 65 containers of walnuts and almonds from Mariani to Simple Foods during 2017 and 2018. Simple Foods contended that 14 containers had mold and other problems, 29 containers were shipped late and 10 were not shipped. (Altman Decl. ¶ 4.) After the parties could not resolve their differences, they agreed to arbitrate before the Dried Fruit ...
2023.02.08 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 775
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.08
Excerpt: ...edit card debt. (Complaint.) Plaintiff moves for summary judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication of the first cause of action for open book account and the second cause of action for account stated. (Notice.) The complaint, however, alleges only a single cause of action for common counts on separate theories of open book account and account stated. (Complaint.) Accordingly, the request for summary adjudication is denied because the ca...
2023.02.08 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 810
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.08
Excerpt: ...addressed at the hearing and the parties should be prepared to point to specific evidence which is claimed to show the existence or non-existence of a triable issue of material fact. *** Defendants California Department of Veterans Affairs (“DVA”) and Ramon Carlos' (“Carlos”)(collectively “Defendants”) motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication is ruled upon as follows. I. Overview This is an employment a...
2023.02.08 Motion to Compel Further Responses 635
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.08
Excerpt: ...tion arising from alleged sexual abuse of Plaintiff. On March 18, 2022, Defendant served Request for Production of Documents, Set Six (“RFP”) on Plaintiff. (Langenfeld Decl., ¶ 3, Exh. 1.) Plaintiff provided unverified responses on June 17, 2022. (Id., ¶ 5, Exh. 3.) On August 12, 2022, Plaintiff provided a verification that had been executed on August 1. (Id., ¶ 5, Exh. 4.) After various meet and confer efforts, Plaintiff provided verified...
2023.02.08 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 571
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.08
Excerpt: ...es not provide notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 1.06(D). Counsel for Defendant is ordered to notify Plaintiffs' counsel immediately of the tentative ruling system and to be available at the hearing, in person or by telephone, in the event Plaintiffs' counsel appears without following the procedures set forth in Local Rule 1.06(B). The Court further notes counsel for Defendant has failed to comply with this r...
2023.02.08 Motion to Set Aside Summary Judgment 589
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.08
Excerpt: ...mmary judgment. In its June 1, 2022 tentative ruling, the Court noted that “[o]n May 18, 2022, the Court initially issued a tentative ruling indicating that the motion was moot on the basis that Plaintiff Gregory Smith, M.D., Inc. has dismissed its claims on February 25, 2022. However, as pointed out by Defendants' counsel, the dismissal was filed by Plaintiff Gregory Smith, M.D. an individual. The Court therefore continued the matter to today'...
2023.02.08 Motion to Discharge Receiver for Criminal Misconduct, Fraud, and Abuse 266
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.08
Excerpt: ...IED as follows. This action was initiated on January 12, 2021 by Petitioner City of Citrus Heights (“Petitioner”) by the filing of a petition for an order to abate and appointment of receiver pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17980.7. Petitioners presented evidence that a residential property owned by Respondent was in substandard condition and had been the subject of several complaints related to large accumulations of trash and deb...
2023.02.07 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 854
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...ommon counts based on an open book account for money due and an account stated in writing between Plaintiff and Defendant. (Complaint, p. 3.) According to Plaintiff's computerized records of the loan, which are maintained in the ordinary course of Plaintiff's business, the remaining balance on the loan, including interest, totals $3,635.55. (UMF Nos. 7, 10.) Legal Standard CCP section 473c(c) requires that a motion for summary judgment be granted...
2023.02.07 Demurrer 326
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...cle along the Sacramento Bike Trail, just after its intersection with Freeport Boulevard.” (Compl. ¶ 2.) The Complaint alleges that, “an unknown individual and/or employee of Defendants… left the gate providing access to Freeport Boulevard open, allowing it to hang over the bike trail,” and Plaintiff, “struck the end of the subject gate, where the metal plate is located, while riding his bike along the bike trail…” (Compl., ¶ 3.) ...
2023.02.07 Demurrer 597
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...ailable for oral argument at the above-stated time. Appearance will be by ZOOM. To appear on Zoom telephonically, call (833) 568- 8864 and enter the following Zoom ID: 16146506749. The demurrer of defendants to plaintiff in pro per Yandell's complaint is ruled upon as follows. Factual Background This action arises from an incident occurring at California State Prison, Sacramento in February 2019. Plaintiff alleges he was ordered to prepare for tr...
2023.02.07 Motion for Summary Judgment 283
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...all material facts that the moving party contends are undisputed” and that “[e] ach of the material facts…shall be followed by a reference to the supporting evidence” but also specifying “[t]he failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may in the court's discretion constitute a sufficient ground for denying the motion.” The Court denies counsel's request for leave to now file the missing separate statement becaus...
2023.02.07 Motion for Summary Judgment 864
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...arrested Plaintiff at his home for a string of armed robberies that Plaintiff did not commit. Plaintiff brings three distinct causes of action: (1) general negligence, (2) false arrest, and (3) false imprisonment. Plaintiff also makes a claim for exemplary damages. (See Complaint at pp. 4-7.) Plaintiff initiated this action on September 27, 2021 by filing a personal injury/property damage complaint on Judicial Council Form PLD-PI-001. Also on Sep...
2023.02.07 Motion for Additional Time to Depose 504
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...ity for the Elderly (“RFCE”) owned and operated by Defendants Caroline Kang, LLC dba Laguna Woods, RCFE, Caroline Kang, and Francis Kang (collectively, “Kang Defendants”). Plaintiffs allege that on September 20, 2017, Decedent was beaten with a metal cane by Defendant Mee Lai Fong and suffered a subdural hematoma that ultimately caused her death. Plaintiffs allege that the Kang Defendants knew of Ms. Fong's violent and menacing behavior, ...
2023.02.07 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 855
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ... argument is requested, the parties are directed to notify the clerk and opposing counsel at the time of the request which of moving defendant's 15 separate issues for summary adjudication, which of moving defendant's 126 Undisputed Material Facts, which of plaintiff's written objections to evidence and/or which of defendant's written objections to evidence will be addressed at the hearing. The parties should be prepared to point to specific admi...
2023.02.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 307
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...l is directed to contact opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing, along with the correct address for Dept. 53/54. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom or by telephone. Both NNA and plaintiff's 16-page moving and opposing memorandum of points and authorities fa...
2023.02.07 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 237
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...ty of the specific discovery requests that will be addressed at the hearing. The parties are also reminded that pursuant to local rules, only limited oral argument is permitted on law and motion matters. *** The Court notes that plaintiff paid only one $60 filing fee in connection with this motion, although it seeks at least two (2) different orders (i.e., further responses to requests for production and production of responsive documents). A sep...
2023.02.07 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Enter Judgment 044
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...o contact Defendant prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom or by telephone. Plaintiff has indicated the incorrect address in its notice of motion. The correct address for Department 54 of the Sacramento Superior Court is 813 6th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. Plaintiff's counsel shall notify Defendant of the correct address immediately. Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's (“Pla...
2023.02.07 Motion to Strike (SLAPP) 412
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...0, 21, 26, 27, 29, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42, 122-133, 135, 138, 140, 144, 145, 148, and 149 are sustained. Objection Nos. 2, 5, 10, 13, 22, 23, 30, 31, and 65 are overruled. The Court does not rule on the remaining objections as they were related to evidence that was not considered or otherwise material to the Court's ruling on the merits of the motion. (See CCP § 437c(q); see also Taus v. Loftus (2007) 40 Cal.4th 683, 714 [describing anti-SLAPP motio...
2023.02.07 Writ of Attachment 339
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.07
Excerpt: ...he manner to request a hearing, along with the correct address for Dept. 53/54. If moving counsel is unable to contact defendants or their counsel, if any, opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom or by telephone. Plaintiff's application for right to attach order and for writ of attachment as against defendant Virk Systems, Inc. is ruled upon as follows. The Court notes that plaintiff paid only...
2023.02.02 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay of Proceedings 481
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ...ent concealment in connection with her purchase of a 2021 Nissan Kicks (“Vehicle”) from Nissan of Sacramento. Plaintiff alleges she received various warranties from Defendant in connection with the purchase of the Vehicle and that defects arose during the warranty period. (Comp. ¶¶ 2, 3.) Plaintiff alleges that she delivered the Vehicle to an authorized service and repair facility on numerous occasions for defects in the Vehicle, including ...
2023.02.02 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 472
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ...mber 4, 2006, and a judgment was entered against the Defendant on December 27, 2006. The Judgment was renewed on September 4, 2015 in the sum of $12,264.30. Plaintiff levied on defendant's assets in 2021. Defendant contends she did not know of the judgment until 2022. Defendant states that early in the summer of 2022 she discovered there was a lien on her property. Defendant states that this case involved a Citibank credit card that was allegedly...
2023.02.02 Motion to File FAC 198
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ...to and Grass Valley. (Complaint, ¶1.) Nivano's role is to bridge and manage the relationship between those involved in providing medical care and the patients in need of receiving it. (Ibid.) Nivano alleges that Patel and Kyle engaged in a scheme to illegally gain control of Nivano and then to illegally profit from its providers and their patients. (Id., ¶2.) There is no trial date. Nivano contends that the effect of the proposed amendment is t...
2023.02.02 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 262
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ...action for national origin/race discrimination, gender discrimination, disability discrimination, failure to engage in the interactive process, failure to provide reasonable accommodation, retaliation and failure to prevent discrimination and retaliation. At issue on the instant motion are Defendant's responses to special interrogatories nos. 1‐22. In its responses, Defendant raised numerous objections, including that the interrogatories were v...
2023.02.02 Motion to Compel Further Responses 538
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ...Plaintiffs entered into an express warranty contract with General Motors, Inc. [“Defendant”] regarding the subject vehicle. (Id., ¶¶ 9‐10.) During the warranty period, defects in the subject vehicle's battery became apparent. (Id., ¶ 14.) Plaintiffs also allege Defendant knew the vehicle was defective but it refused to offer to re‐purchase the vehicle in violation of the Song‐Beverly Act. (Id. ¶ 16.) Defendant also allegedly failed ...
2023.02.02 Motion to Compel Further Responses 272
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ...d by Defendant, and that defects allegedly became apparent during the warranty period. (Complaint ¶ 9.) Plaintiff alleges the subject vehicle had a defective battery and engine. (Id. ¶ 14.) Defendant had knowledge it would be unable to service or repair the vehicle to conform to the express warranties after a reasonable number of opportunities, yet it refused to re‐purchase the vehicle in violation of the Song‐Beverly Act. (Id. ¶ 27.) On M...
2023.02.02 Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses 681
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ... (deceased) (“Sam”) operated the family businesses for the personal benefit of his mistress, Yimin Dai and himself. Defendant is the trustee of the Samuel B. Fong Trust and Executor of Samuel B. Fong's estate. Plaintiff is one of Sam's siblings. Given that claims against Sam were raised against his estate, Creditor's Claims were filed as required by the Probate Code in the pending probate for Sam's estate. At issue on the instant motion are P...
2023.02.02 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, to Strike 608
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Krueger, Christopher E
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ... Frontier. Defendant contends the Sales Contract with the dealer, the seller of the vehicle, contains a valid, written arbitration agreement (the "Arbitration Provision"). Defendant, the manufacturer, contends it may enforce the Arbitration Provision pursuant to the doctrine of equitable estoppel. As the California Court of Appeal held in Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486,496‐99, review denied (Nov. 24,2020), equitable estoppel ...
2023.02.02 Motion for Summary Adjudication 209
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Sueyoshi, Richard K
Hearing Date: 2023.02.02
Excerpt: ...uests for judicial notice are granted. In Plaintiff RL Liquidators, LLC's second amended complaint (“SAC”), Plaintiff alleged that Landlord owns real property at 221 Richards Boulevard (“Subject Property”). Plaintiff leases the Subject Property pursuant to a commercial lease. Plaintiff alleged that Safelite leases other real property from Landlord which is adjacent to the Subject Property. Plaintiff alleged that it leased the Subject Prop...

6288 Results

Per page

Pages