Excerpt: ...“IIED”); 6th Caus e of Action for Violation of the Ralph Act [California Civil Code §51.7]; and 7th Cause of Action for Gender Violence in Violation of California Civil Code § 52.4 “[A]n employer is vicariously liable for the torts of its employees committed within the sco pe of the employment.” (Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital (1995) 12 Cal.4th 291, 296 (Lisa M.).) An employer's vicarious liability may extend to an empl...

Excerpt: ...are entitled t o reasonably incurred costs, including attorney's fees. Counsel provided detailed billing records showing a lodestar total of $104,626.50 based on 256.9 hours. (Kirnos Decl., Ex. A.) Defendant argues that hours are excessive due to overstaffing by 17 atto rneys. “[I]t is appropriate for a trial court to reduce a fee award based on its reasonable determination that a routine, noncomplex case was overstaffed to a degree that signi�...

Excerpt: ...ff's first (breach of written contract) and second (money had and received) causes of action are based on the terms of the Lease entered between the parties. (FAC ¶¶ 14 –16, 19.) With respect to the first cause of action, the FAC alleged that “Defendants and each of them br eached the Lease on or about August 2, 2022 . . . by failing and refusing to compensate and reimburse Plaintiff for the damage Plaintiff has incurred as a result of th...

Excerpt: ...xpenditures, does not make every proposed action by the administrative board a petitioning activity before a governmental entity. Here administrative board meetings of a non -profit organization, even one whose fiscal sponsor and oversight falls to a City, cannot be de emed part of any “legislative,” “judicial,” or “official” proceeding, or indeed any proceeding “authorized by law” and reviewable by writ of mandate. (See Slaught...

Excerpt: ... (C.C.P. § 437c(q).) Plaintiffs object to Vance and Downey's own deposition testimony. These are not welltaken and are overruled. Plaintiffs objections to portions of the traffic collision report regarding the officer's conclusion that Vance caused the collision by fa iling to stop at the stop sign at Via Zapeda and Canyon Crest Drive are sustained as hearsay. (People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665. 694695.) The objections to the declarations ...

Excerpt: ...ims XP breached the Contract by entering into an agreement with Safeco to with regard the value of the property without his consent in violation of Section 18(J) of the NAIC Model Laws, Regulations, Guidelines and Other Resources (October 2015), which provides that an adjuster may not agree to any loss settlement without the insured's knowledge or consent. (FAC, ¶31.) However, Plaintiff does not point to any contractual terms relating to Claims ...

Excerpt: ...mounts, and is reluctant to accept the funds because of a potential fee dispute (¶ 16), as hearsay, as well as lacking foundation and personal knowledge. The statements are hearsay and do not appear to fall within any exception, so the objections are sustained. II. C.C.P . § 664.6 C.C.P. section 664.6 provides, “If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside the presence of the court or orally before th...

Excerpt: ... expert testimo ny to create a triable issue of fact regarding either the standard of care or the causation of her injuries. (Hakhamian Dec.) A dentist is required to have and to use that degree of learning and skill ordinarily possessed by dentists of good professional r eputation practicing in the vicinity. (Barham v. Widing (1930) 210 Cal. 206, 213). Failure to use such ordinary skill and care in the application of such knowledge renders a den...

Excerpt: ...” notwithstanding the s tay. (CCP §425.16(g).) The court should allow reasonable and specified discovery “when evidence to establish a prima facie case is reasonably shown to be held, or known, by defendant or its agents and employees.” (Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v. Chronicle Pub lishing Co. (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 855, 868.) To show good cause, however, plaintiff must make a prima facie showing at least as to the elements of the claim for ...

Excerpt: ...th 97, 113.) Her e, Defendant, Wanhoo, requests the Court take judicial notice of: 1) a print -out from the California Secretary of State's website of the Statement of Information for Wanhoo, LLC, filed on 7/22/22; 2) the subject POS filed on 12/8/22; 3) three invoices issu ed by Cheung & Chu, CPA to Wanhoo, LLC, in 2022 and 2023, for accounting services; and, 4) a letter dated 11/15/23 from Wanhoo's counsel challenging substitute service as im...

Excerpt: ...f Expert Mark Blanchette on grounds stated. Declaration of Mark Giannamore: OVERRULE Objections Nos. 1-9. SUSTAIN Objections Nos. 9-14 on grounds stated. Declaration of Mark Burns: SUSTAIN Objections Nos. 15, 17, 19 (1st), 19 (2nd), 20 ,21 and 22 on grounds stated. [The Court notes that in there is no Objection 16 indicated in the objections, and that there are two Objections Nos. 19, identified here as "19(1st) and IS(2nd). OVERRULE Objection No...

Excerpt: ...ostic tests and procedures, conditions, scope, and nature of the examination. CCP § 2032.320(d). It is unclear what types of tests and what neurological issues the examination will cover. In reply, Defendants make no attempt to fix this issue, even though it is pointed ou t by Plaintiff. Based on this alone, the motion must be denied without prejudice. Defendants' request that Plaintiff be precluded from audio recording the examination is also ...

Excerpt: ...he FAC is uncertain based on incorporating by reference paragraphs. (See FAC, ¶¶ 45, 70, 79, 89, 111, 124, 140, 145, 155, 163, 168.) Incorporating by reference is a common pleading practice and the demurrer is overruled to the extent it is based on this practice. Defendant also contends that Plainti
¯s fail to state who the eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth causes of action are brought by. Typically this is indicated in the heading t...

Excerpt: ...olved in a project, Ro cket must b e named as an addition al insured under the subcontractor's policy or the SNIC Policy does not apply to the occurrence and thus there is no coverage. (FACC, Exh. B.) SNIC argues Rocket's ailure to allege it was an additional insured under Divine's policy means that Rocket has not stated a cause o action. However, SNIC cites to no authority requiring it to make such a speciÞc allegation. Indeed, Rocket's alleg...

Excerpt: ...stantial cause of Plaintiffs injuries. Defendants' Evidentiary Objections. The matters to which objections are made were not material to the preparation of the analysis on this motion, and therefore are overruled on such grounds. Objections not ruled upon by the trial court are presumed overruled and preserved for appellate review. (See Reid v. Google, Inc. (2010) 50 Cal.4th 512, 532 [summary judgment motionl.) l. Defendants met their initial bur...

Excerpt: ... injunction: (1) the likelihood that the plaintiff will prevail on the merits at trial and (2) the interim harm that the plaintff would be likely to sustain if the injunction were denied as compared to the harm the defendant would be likely to suffer if the preliminary injunction were issued." (Smith v. Adventist Health System/west (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 729, 749.) This test functions on a sliding scale, such that a greater showing on one factor ...

Excerpt: ...lleged injury that served as the basis for her claims in Henry v. Henry, RIC1906267. (See, RFJN, Exs. 1, 5.) Additionally, Defendant was also a defendant in that action. However, while the Court entered judgment against Plaintiff in RIC1906267, that judgment is currently on appeal. Under California law, a judgment is not final for purposes of res judicata during the pendency of and until the resolution of the appeal. (The Inland Oversight Comm. v...

Excerpt: ...9.) Because Jayco seeks to stay the action rather than dismiss, this Court will retain jurisdiction and Plaintiffs may move to lift the stay if the Indiana court refuses to apply California law. (See Investors Equity Life Holding Co. v. Schmidt (2015) 233 Cal. App. 4th 1363, 1376.) Because Jayco stipulates to the application of California law, it has met its burden of establishing that the forum selection will not result in the loss of any statut...

Excerpt: ...e moving Declaration of Mark Blanchette, who earned a Ph.D. in Biokinesiology with specialization in Biomechnics and has experience with premises liability accidents, etc. (See Ex. I to moving Compendium of Exhibits.) The evidentiary objections are based on lack of personal knowledge (Ev. Code SS 702, 800), and improper expert opinion (Ev. Code S 803.) For example: Objection No. 1 to entire Blanchette Declaration. As to lack of personal knowledge...

Excerpt: ...Gregory Nylen, which the court rules on as follows: 1. SUSTAIN 2. OVERRULE Here, Plaintiff's claims fall into two categories—individual and derivative. Plaintiff's individual claims are clearly covered by the Arbitration Agreement. As to the derivative claims, it is well established that the initiator of a derivative suit "stands in the shoes" of the company whose rights such person seeks to enforce, and "[t]he causes of action do not belong to...

Excerpt: ...ir reply. As the defects these objections are directed to are easily fixable (and if remedied, the expert declaration is likely sufficient to create a triable issue of material fact), the motion is continued to allow Plaintiff to submit the necessary evidence to properly support her expert's opinion. A. General Objection to Plaintiff's Declaration Defendants first raise a general objection to Plaintiff's declaration, in which she disputes certain...

Excerpt: ...les of justice and equity ... paths neither marked no traceable by judicial review." (Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (1992) 3 cal.4th 1, 11; Noguerio v. Kaiser Found. Hospitals (1988) 203 cal.App.3d 1192, 1195.) Courts will not review the validity of the arbitrator's reasoning or the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the arbitrator's award. (Moncharsh v. Heily & Blasé, supra, 3 Cal.4th at 12-13.) By agreeing to arbitration, parties agree to bea...

Excerpt: ...e the initial filing fee is the only amount that has been properly documented. Defendants argue fees to download copies of documents from the court are not recoverable because they are not filing or motion fees. In Opposition, Plaintiff provides invoices to support the following costs: 1. Legal Lawgic eFiling (11/1/23): $43.70 2. Legal Lawgic eFiling (10/26/23): $43.70 2 Even if the Court was inclined to find that Defendant's had met their burden...

Excerpt: ...(2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 855.) The California Supreme Court has held that the conduct of teachers who sexually molest students under their supervision will not be imputed to school districts to permit recovery by injured students from the employing districts under the doctrine of respondeat superior. (John R. v. Oakland Unified School Dist. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 438, 447-52; Kimberly M. v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 545, 547-...

Excerpt: ...project contained a fungus that caused Valley Fever; he contracted Valley Fever; his predecessor at the project also contracted Valley Fever; Defendants did not inform Plaintiff about the predecessor or that he had Valley Fever; and his symptoms got worse. (Complaint at "1 12-22.) However, there are no allegations indicating Defendants knew the fungus that caused Valley Fever was in the soil at the project, that they knew how Plaintiff's predeces...