Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

7733 Results

Location: Orange County x
2021.05.10 Motions to Compel Deposition, to Quash Subpoena 590
Location: Orange County
Judge: Zeltzer, Nancy
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Demurrers 385
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lewis, Gregory
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Motion to Compel Arbitration 627
Location: Orange County
Judge: Zeltzer, Nancy
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Demurrer 559
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lewis, Gregory
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 105
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gooding, Martha K
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 750
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gooding, Martha K
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Anti-SLAPP Motion
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Motion for Bifurcation 117
Location: Orange County
Judge: Zeltzer, Nancy
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Motion for Sanctions 107
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gooding, Martha K
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 434
Location: Orange County
Judge: Zeltzer, Nancy
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Motion for Summary Judgment, for Issue or Evidentiary Sanctions
Location: Orange County
Judge: Scott, Nathan
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Motion for Writ of Mandate 081
Location: Orange County
Judge: Gooding, Martha K
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 474
Location: Orange County
Judge: Lewis, Gregory
Hearing Date: 2021.05.10
Excerpt: ......
2021.05.07 Motion to Compel Further Responses 360
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1435, citations omitted [explaining “This rule is designed ‘to encourage the parties to work out their differences informally so as to avoid the necessity for a formal order.'”].) Here, the record shows St. George's counsel sent a single letter, on January 25, 2021, to defense counsel to address four sets of discovery responses. (Williams Decls., at ¶ 4, Exh. C.) Defense counsel sent a response...
2021.05.07 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 095
Location: Orange County
Judge: Di Cesare, James
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: .... Until recently, defendant owned a distribution center in Camarillo, California, with twenty-one (21) non-exempt hourly-pay employees. On or about 07/31/17, defendant received an unannounced visit at its Orange County headquarters from Forensic Auditor Shearer with the U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement division of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security referred to as “ICE”. A Notice of Inspection was hand served that same day, calling f...
2021.05.07 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 303
Location: Orange County
Judge: Moss, Robert
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...ants' separate statement is grouped by cause of action, with between 2-3 discrete issues for adjudication set forth below, instead of setting each issue as a separate noticed issue with its own section as required by the Rules of Court. Additionally, rather than sent forth separately, each Undisputed Material Facts (“UMF”) in support of each noticed issue, most of the separate statement incorporates the preceding UMFs by reference. Failure to...
2021.05.07 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication, for Protective Order and Stay and Motion to Quash 360
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...mmary judgment or, in alternative, summary adjudication is DENIED. The Court declines to rule on the parties' evidentiary objections, which are immaterial to the disposition of the motion. (CCP § 437c(q).) I. Summary Judgment The only questions that may be litigated in a summary judgment motion are whether “the action has no merit” or “there is no defense to the action or proceeding.” (CCP § 437c(a)(1).) As a result, summary judgment ma...
2021.05.07 Motion to Compel Arbitration 361
Location: Orange County
Judge: Moss, Robert
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...agreement with non-party Crevier BMW, which contains the arbitration clause. However, while the existence of the lease is a prerequisite to Plaintiff's Song-Beverly Act claim, plaintiff's claims against BMW do not rely on the terms of the lease. They rely on the express warranty issued by BMW as alleged at paragraph 10 of the complaint. In support of its argument, BMW points to the case of cites Felisilda v. FCA US LLC (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 486. ...
2021.05.07 Motion to Enforce Court Order, for Sanctions 452
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...ed to provide complete responses to every discovery request at issue, as set forth below. 2. The following facts/issues shall be taken as established against Defendants: a. That the tasks performed by Business Managers are governed by detailed uniform policies that prevent the exercise of independent judgment and discretion. b. That the four non-Business Manager hourly employees with the highest hourly rate at each of Defendants' restaurants in e...
2021.05.07 Motion to Compel Further Responses 844
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ..., § 2030.220, subds. (a) & (b).) Where the question is specific and explicit, an answer that supplies only a portion of the information sought is improper. It is also improper to provide “deftly worded conclusionary answers designed to evade a series of explicit questions.” (Deyo v. Kilbourne (1978) 84 Cal.App.3d 771, 783.) A motion to compel also lies where the party to whom the interrogatories were directed gave responses deemed improper b...
2021.05.07 Motion to Compel Further Responses 886
Location: Orange County
Judge: Servino, Deborah C
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...complied with the requirements of California Rule of Court 3.1345(c); and, in any event a separate statement is not required in all instances because a concise outline may be allowed pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1345(b). (Reply, at p. 8.) Plaintiffs document is labeled a "Separate Statement." It does not comply with California Rule of Court 3.1345(c). As to Plaintiffs' argument that a separate statement was not required, effective Janua...
2021.05.07 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 202
Location: Orange County
Judge: Sanders, Glenda
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...Inc. (1972) 7 Cal.3 rd 695, 706; See also Civil Code §8180). Per Civil Code §8412 and Civil Code §8180(a), the maximum period in which a mechanic's lien may be recorded is 150 days from the date of cessation of labor (i.e. 60 days after cessation is “completion” and then 90 days from completion). “Courts have looked at whether the work at issue was required under the claimant's contract in determining whether a work of improvement was co...
2021.05.07 Petition for Coordination 167
Location: Orange County
Judge: Claster, William D
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...is in Department C26, but he has designated the case complex and stayed proceedings to permit the filing of this coordination petition. (Brady Decl. (ROA 5), Ex. C.) As a result of the stay, while Cardenas has been designated complex, it has not yet been transferred to a complex department by the Presiding Judge. I. Background A. Factual Allegations The Included Actions, whose complaints are nearly word-for-word identical except for details about...
2021.05.07 Petition for Writ of Mandate 889
Location: Orange County
Judge: Moss, Robert
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ...ut also her history involving erratic driving. The hearing report of 5-22-18 states in part: “Did the Respondent cause or contribute to the cause of a collision that resulted in a fatality? The department finds that the Respondent contributed to the cause of a collision based on the physical evidence regarding the damages sustained to the Mercedes Benz on the left driver side which is consistent with damage sustained to Respondent's vehicle on ...
2021.05.07 Motion for Attorney Fees 613
Location: Orange County
Judge: Moss, Robert
Hearing Date: 2021.05.07
Excerpt: ... the court finds was reasonably and necessarily incurred. Plaintiffs argue that no apportionment between defendants is required. However, plaintiffs have not provided any evidence to show that apportionment is not required. Defendant Mission Pools of Escondido argues that defendants Sal Vargas dba New Vision Landscape, and New Vision Landscape, Inc., should bear a proportionate share of plaintiffs' attorney fees, on grounds of comparative and/or ...

7733 Results

Per page

Pages