Excerpt: ... cause of action and for uncertainty, (4) the Third Cause of Action for Fraud Failure to state a cause of action and for uncertainty, (5) the Fourth Cause of Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty for Failure to state a cause of action and for uncertainty, (6) the Fifth Cause of Acton Cause for Conversion for Failure to state a cause of action and for uncertainty, (7) the Sixth Cause of Acton for Aiding and Abetting Conversion for Failure to state a...

Excerpt: ... (2) that she did not suffer wage loss, (3) that she did not suffer loss of earnings capacity, (4) that she did not suffer medical expense, (5) that she did not suffer general damages, (6) that she was negligent at the time of the incident, (7) that Plaintiff's negligence was the The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4111 to no...

Excerpt: ...iff slipped at 1:43, (5) The same customer walks through the area again and begins eating again at 1:43, (6) Plaintiff slippled and fell on grapes spilled by the customer at 1:44, (7) The location of the slip was the main action aisle of the Walmart, (8) the Walmart was located in Merced, and (9) Plaintiff filed a lawsuit containing a single cause of action against Walmart and its manager. While the sequence of events occurred over a relatively s...

Excerpt: ...ity, (6) undue annoyance, embarrassment, and oppression, and privacy are OVERRULED. While it is true that any direct negligence by Defendant Brad Johnson Trucking with regard to training or other actons relating to the management of its driver are not relevant the driver is determined not to have been negligent at the time of the incident, they remain relevant until such time that Defendant Brad Johnson Trucking prov-des an unambiguous admission ...

Excerpt: ...aining a First Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief, a Second Cause of Action for Injunction, and a Third Cause of Acton for Writ of Mandate to enforce an agency to perform an alleged ministerial duty, the reopening of a fish ladder. On January 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Verified Complaint for Public Nuisance, Violation of Constitution Rights of Due Process and Equal Protection, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, and Verified Pet...

Excerpt: ... damages portion of the trial, the actual wording of the motion goes somewhat farther, stating: Defendants "will move this Court for an order (1) bifurcating the trial into liability (determined by clear and convincing evidence that Defendants intentionally concealed information from Plaintiffs Abel H. Arias, and Maciel and Alejandra Galicia ('Plaintiff<) regarding a defective totally integrated power module (TIPVI') in their vehicle) and punitiv...

Excerpt: ...was made and overruled is in fact a moton for reconsideration and the instant motion to strike fails to comply with the procedural requirements of a moton for reconsideration. Finally, the evidentiary objections raised in the Motion to Strike are due consideration of the merits of such objections by this Court, are without merit, and are hereby OVERRULED. Motion for Reconsideration The moton for reconsideration brought by Defendant/cross-complain...

Excerpt: ...use of Action for Declaratory Relief, a Second Cause of Action for Injunction, and a Third Cause of Action for Writ of Mandate to enforce an agency to perform an alleged ministerial duty, the reopening of a fish ladder. The Demurrer by Merced Irrigation District is supported by a Request for Judicial Notice of the following documents more particularly described in the Request for Judicial Notice filed with this Court by Defendant/Respondent Merce...

Excerpt: ... appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4111 to notify the court of your intent to appear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. To limit the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the court encourages remote hearings. Parties who contest the tentative ruling or wish to appear at a hea...

Excerpt: ...d by Defendants Despite No Loss of Earnings Claim, and Request for Sanctions in the Amount of $2,547.95 Against Defendant Pedro Molina, Sr., Irvin Trucking, Inc., and its Attorneys Cholakian & Associates is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. The Three subpoenas seek confidential employment records to which a right to privacy exists despite conceding that no claim for lost wages or inability to work is pending and that such claim has in fact been...

Excerpt: ...that while “Bad Faith” is not defined in the statute, “case law has defined gross negligence as the want of even scant care or an extreme departure from the ordinary standard of conduct.” (Id. [quoting Eastburn v. Regional Protection Authority (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1175, 1185-1186].) The Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint for Damages alleges in ¶ 16 that at approximately 11:50 p.m. the Los Banos Disbatcher dispatched at least two Los ...

Excerpt: ...cial and Form Interrogatories, and for sanctions raises similar issues to those addressed by this Court on Tuesday, February 21, 2023 in connection with a motion by Plaintiff Parkash Pabla to Compel Further Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions, Requests for Production of Documents, Special and Form Interrogatories, and for sanctions. At the Tuesday hearing, after hearing extensive The following tentative rulings shall become the rulin...

Excerpt: ..., 12.7, 15.1, 16.1-16.8, 17.1, 50.1, and 50.3-50.5; and for monetary sanctions in the amount of $4,800 pursuant to CCP § 2031.310, 2023.010, 2030.300 The Motion by Plaintiffs Parkash Pabla and Jaswinder Kaur to Compel Defendant Dual Arch International, Inc. to Provide Further Responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Admission Nos. 5, 6, 11- 13, 15-21, 24-32, 35, 37, 40-42, 44, 46, 49, 55-58, and 60-63 is GRANTED. Objections by Defendant Dual Arch I...

Excerpt: ...ld: “Damages for fear of cancer may be recovered only if the plaintiff pleads and proves that (1) as a result of Defendant's negligent breach of a duty owed to the Plaintiff, the plaintiff is exposed to a toxic substance which threatens cancer; and (2) the plaintiff's fear stems from a knowledge, corroborated by reliable medical or scientific opinion, that it is more likely than not that the plaintiff will develop the cancer in the future due t...

Excerpt: ...to judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff as submitted general evidentiary objections along with specific evidentiary objections to Exhibit 3, the Declaration of Jake Farmer, Exhibit 5, Exhibit 6, Exhibit 7, and Exhibit 8 on the grounds of failure to lay proper foundation, improper authentication, failure to qualify expert testimony, hearsay and lack of personal knowledge. Those objections are OVERRULED. This Court finds that an adequate foundati...

Excerpt: ...llowing tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725‐4111 to notify the court of your intent to appear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. To limit the spread of the COVID‐19 vi...

Excerpt: ...AMEND. The Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED and this Court, on its own motion, take Judicial Notice of its order granting summary judgment on the Complaint in this action. This Court finds that Cross‐Complainant 4‐S Ranch Partners, LLC has failed to allege facts establishing tender or a judicially recognized exception to requirement for tender. (See Arnolds Management Corp. v. Eischen (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 575, 578). As a general rule, ...

Excerpt: ...ven the contention by Cross‐Defendant Altenergy Power Systems USA that a declaration of necessity conforming CCP § 2030.050 was not provided. There can be no dispute that a party who has propounded an interrogatory has the right to withdraw that interrogatory at any time before it is answered. Valley Unique Electic, Inc. asserts that no response was received to an initial set of interrogatires and that Valley Unique Electric elected to withdra...

Excerpt: ...irst Cause of Action for Adverse Possession. This shifts the burden to to Plaintiffs to provide admissible evidence establishing a triable issue of material fact. The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725‐ 4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your inte...

Excerpt: ...ed, Israel Rosales, Imelda Vivero, and Kenneth Calderon have joined is DENIED. While CCP § 583.310 and CCP § 583.360 provide for mandatory dismissal if an action is not brought to trial within five years after the action is commenced, CCP § 583.340 provides three conditions which “shall be excluded” from the computation of time to which the mandatory dismissal is required if the matter is not brought to trial: (a) the Jurisdiction of the C...

Excerpt: ...rnative Summary Adjudication on the grounds that Civil Code Section 1009 bars claims by Plaintiff Anthony Silva and Plaintiff Daniel Silva for (1) Quiet Title to Easement by Prescription, (2) Declaratory Relief, and (3) Interference with Easement because Plaintiffs are members of the general public and not adjacent landowners is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. While it is possible that facts exist that would cause Civil Code Section 1009 to bar Plainti...

Excerpt: ...ion of Documents Set No. 1, and for Monetary Sanctions of $2,169.00 Against Plaintiff's Counsel Harry B. Gill Pursuant to CCP § 2031.280(a) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Request 16: [Documents Supporting Contentions that Flagstar Bank Loan as been paid] The original objections to Request 16 by Plaintiff Jaswinder Kaur on the grounds of overly broad, oppressive, unduly burdensome, harassing, vague and ambiguous, unlikely to lead to the d...

Excerpt: ...native Summary Adjudication on the grounds that Civil Code Section 1009 bars claims by Plaintiff Anthony Silva and Plaintiff Daniel Silva for (1) Quiet Title to Easement by Prescription, (2) Declaratory Relief, and (3) Interference with Easement because Plaintiffs are members of the general public and not adjacent landowners is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. While it is possible that facts exist that would cause Civil Code Section 1009 to bar Plaintif...

Excerpt: ...MEND. The other grounds for demurrer to the First Cause of Action are OVERRULED AS MOOT given the above ruling. The Demurrer to the First Amended Complaint's Second Cause of Action for Cancellation of a Written Instrumentation on the grounds that (1) it fails to state a cause of action, (2) the statute of limitations bars the action, (3) fails to meet the requirements of Civil Code § 3412 is SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND to plead around the stat...

Excerpt: ...ons of $5,419.71 pursuant to CCP § 2023.010 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Request No. 5 [Documents Relating to Quality Control of Microinverter models including model number APS YC‐500A]: The Objections by Cross‐Defendant Altenergy Power Systems USA Inc., on the grounds of relevance, not calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, unduly burdensome, oppressive, seeking confidential proprietary trade secret informatio...