Excerpt: ...s not adequately supported by the evidence. Background On or around March 1, 2017, plaintiff and two other entities, as “Landlord,” and defendant Umesh Kumar Sharma, DBA Pizza Amigo, as “Tenant,” entered into a lease agreement for certain retail premises in a mall. The property has been occupied or otherwise in Tenant's possession since that same month. After the property was conveyed entirely to plaintiff in December 2018, the lease was ...

Excerpt: ...essential facts of his or her case “with reasonable precision and with particularity sufficient to acquaint [the] defendant with the nature, source and extent” of the plaintiff's claim. (Doheny Park Terrace Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. Truck Ins. Exchange (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 1076, 1099). Legal conclusions are insufficient. (Id. at 1098–1099; Doe at 551, fn. 5.) The Court “assume[s] the truth of the allegations in the complaint, but do[es]...

Excerpt: ...f Robert Dandrea worked as a Manager at the Pep Boys located at 520 Contra Costa Blvd. in Pleasant Hill. Plaintiff suffered a workplace injury on September 9, 2019. Plaintiff alleges Defendants failed to engage in the interactive process or provide reasonable accommodations. Instead, Plaintiff was suspended and then terminated on September 19, 2019. Plaintiff alleges that throughout his employment he performed his duties competently and in satisf...

Excerpt: ... against defendants are barred by judicial estoppel. Plaintiffs filed Chapter 13 bankruptcies on three separate occasions, taking advantage of the automatic stay to delay foreclosure. But plaintiffs failed to list any claim against defendants on their bankruptcy schedules, or to correct those schedules during the pendency of the bankruptcies. The authorities cited by defendants confirm that this conscious omission is fatal to all of plaintiffs' c...

Excerpt: ... speak English. Plaintiff alleges her manager would become angry when she spoke with the tenants in Spanish. Additionally, her manager forbade her to speak Spanish or Tagalog or keep conversations with tenants. Plaintiff's manager refused to train Plaintiff on the duties of a property manager despite being directed to do so. Plaintiff was told by her manager she was sent there just to look pretty. Plaintiff was informed the manager would make ina...

Excerpt: ... during the meet and confer process. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their first amended complaint by May 6, 2022. The Court sets a case management conference for April 25, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. for the parties to discuss whether this case should be consolidated or coordinated with case MSC22‐00001 (Lynch v. Smietana). Plaintiffs' counsel shall give notice of this CMC to the attorneys in MSC22‐00001 (Lynch v. Smietana) and/or be authorized to spe...

Excerpt: ...rference with contract (FHL against Cyrus Jack), (4) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage (FHL against Cyrus Jack), (5) unfair competition (by FHL against Cyrus Jack), (6) civil conspiracy (FHL against all Defendants), (7) slander per se (Plaintiffs Robert and Joan Marx against Cyrus Jack), (8) intentional CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR COURT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT: 07 HEARING DATE: 04/15/2022 7 infliction of emotional dis...

Excerpt: ... law and motion procedure in future filings. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 1005, subds. (b) and (c).) Defendants' demurrer is sustained in part and overruled in part, as set forth below. Leave to amend is granted. CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR COURT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT: 07 HEARING DATE: 04/15/2022 4 Plaintiffs shall file any further amended complaint on or before May 16, 2022. If plaintiffs choose not to amend, they shall give defendants written n...

Excerpt: ...se of action and is fatally uncertain; and, (2) the third cause of action, for injunctive relief under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), both fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and is fatally uncertain. Introduction & Preliminary Considerations Before specifically addressing the merits of Renew's contentions, the Court first deals with some preliminary matters as a backdrop to that endeavor. First, the Cou...

Excerpt: ...kground and Settlement Terms The original complaint was filed October 23, 2020, raising claims under PAGA and a class action on behalf of non‐exempt employees alleging that defendant violated the Labor Code in various ways. The settlement would create a gross settlement fund of $750,000. The class representative payment to each plaintiff would be $7,500. Counsel's attorney's fees would be $250,000 (33 1/3% of the settlement). Litigation costs w...

Excerpt: ...amended cross‐complaint filed by Lucas Du and Mary Wong and the cross‐complaint filed by Hui Yong. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to this motion, but Du, Wong and Yong have not filed an opposition. Plaintiffs sued the District for nuisance (in various forms), inverse condemnation, dangerous condition of public property, trespass, diversion of water and declaratory relief (based upon the alleged nuisance and trespass). The District moved for s...

Excerpt: ...ound Plaintiff, Julian Hoffman, worked as a registered nurse for defendant hospital San Ramon Regional Medical Center and SRRMC Management, Inc., (collectively “defendants”) from June 2018 through May 2020. Both defendants are subsidiaries or affiliated entities with Tenet Healthcare Corporation, a network of hospitals. In his wage and hour class action complaint, filed in August 2021, plaintiff contends defendants violated various provisions...

Excerpt: ...ame issues as the earlier productions, e.g., not including complete email threads. He argues that more meet and confer sessions will be needed. Defendant is ordered to provide complete responses within 30 days of this order. There also remains the issue of discovery of the current insurance policy. Defendant produced a policy that “was in effect for the relevant time period when Plaintiff filed his lawsuit.” Defendant asserts that this is the...

Excerpt: ...Amended Complaint is lifted. The motion for sanctions is granted as requested, and Plaintiff is awarded $13,024.82 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.99(a), including $12,435.00 in attorneys' fees and $589.82 in costs. Background Plaintiff Mario Ramirez Lopez filed a class action complaint on behalf of himself and other similarly situated employees of E‐Tech alleging seven causes of action, including multiple violations of the Lab...

Excerpt: ...§ 3273.10, and (4) violation of Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq, the body of the Complaint alleges only two causes of action: one for violation of Civil Code § 2923.6 (labeled first cause of action) and one for violation of Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. (labeled third cause of action). For the following reasons, Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is denied. The Temporary Restraining Order issued on February 14, 2022 is dissolv...

Excerpt: ...) As used in this section, “act in furtherance of a person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue” includes: … (2) any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law … The first question before the Court is whe...

Excerpt: ...den of proof that the Hofmann's breached their duty to disclose. The Hofmanns filed this petition to confirm the arbitration award. The Johnsons oppose the petition, arguing that the arbitration award should be vacated. If a petition is filed and served, the Court must confirm an arbitration award unless it corrects the award, vacates the award or dismisses the proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1286.) “Judicial review of an arbitrator's award is ...

Excerpt: ...to April 13, 2022 to be heard in Dept. 21 by the Honorable Jill Fannin. Defendants bring this motion to remove the seal, pursuant Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 2.551. Plaintiff's ex parte application to seal the proceedings was granted by the Court on July 27, 2020. At that time, Defendants had not been served with the summons and complaint; they had no notice and no opportunity to oppose. (Defendants were served almost a year later in April 2021.) I...

Excerpt: ... of forum non conveniens, Defendant's motion is untimely. “A motion to stay or dismiss on the ground of inconvenient forum must be made within the time permitted to plead, i.e., 30 days after service of the complaint, unless extended by stipulation or court order. (§ 418.10, subd. (a).)” (Olinick v. BMG Entertainment (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 1286, 1295.) This ruling does not preclude Defendant from raising the objection after a general appeara...

Excerpt: ...nt, LLC and Betty Dominici. Plaintiff also move to add additional parties, Maruyama Holdings, LLC (as plaintiff) and Ravelloview LLC, A & A Health Services, LLC, AAHS San Pablo LH, LLC; A&A Living, LLC; Alamo Health Management, LLC; and Alamo Senior Living Management, LLC (as defendants). Plaintiff seeks to add about 12 new claims. The proposed SAC seeks to add Maruyama as a Plaintiff in the furtherance of judicial economy. Maruyama's claim runs ...

Excerpt: ...ates to Plaintiff Darinka Allen (“Plaintiff” or “Allen”)'s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) negligent misrepresentation; (4) negligence; and (5) negligent infliction of emotional distress. Defendants demur to all Plaintiff's causes of action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) § 430.10(e) on several grounds. For the following rea...

Excerpt: ...tructive eviction cause of action fails as a result of CCP section 1166(d)(1); and (iv) that the entire complaint is uncertain under CCP section 430.10(f). Murray opposes. The Meet and Confer The Court has carefully reviewed the declaration submitted by counsel for Kizirian as well as the declaration submitted by counsel for Murray. Kizirian's declaration does not meet the requirements of CCP section 430.41(a) in that it does not specify the mann...

Excerpt: ...dant's Submissions To Appraisal Panel. In a letter dated September 24, 2021, the umpire noted that she had received three documents from defendant's appraiser: (1) “Mr. Halpin's Differences by Trade”; (2) “Mr. Halpin's Dispute Discussion by Trade based upon the 2018/2019 Estimates”; (3) “Mr. Halpin's eagleview area diagram.” (Defendant's Exh. 7, p. 3.) Further, defendant apparently submitted a brief to the appraisal panel on September...

Excerpt: ... Western Dental office in El Cerrito. For the following reasons, Defendant's motion is granted. Request for Judicial Notice Defendant requests judicial notice of the Complaint in this action, Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's Demurrer dated February 2, 2021, documents filed with the Court on or before June 10, 2021, and Plaintiffs declaration dated July 20, 2021 and filed July 21, 2021. The Court grants the request, but not the truth of any r...

Excerpt: ...l Notice (RJN). It overrules the City's objection to the County's RJN if the City's Opposition to the County's RJN is deemed an objection. The court takes judicial notice of the existence and contents of the exhibits attached to the County's RJN. The court notes that the City filed considerable evidence with its Reply papers, which may be problematic whether the hearing on this writ is considered a law and motion matter or a trial. (See San Diego...