Excerpt: ...ion Chicago Title Insurance Company and cross -complainant Roya Javid (R Javid”) each filed joinder in Javid's opposition (collectively “Objectors”). On March 29, 2024, defendant and cross complainant Orange Coast Title Company of Northern California (“Orange Coast”) and defendant, cross - defendant and cross -complainant Susan Trujillo (Trujillo) filed response to Tashjian's motion to stay in support of stay. Evidentiary objections O...

Excerpt: ...ecompensated heart failure. (Ibid.) Based on Decedent's medical history, Good Samaritan knew or should have known that Decedent was at high risk of developing pressure sores. (SAC, ¶ 15.) Decedent presented with wounds in her right and left legs. (Ibid.) Pressure sore protocol sho uld have been instituted and followed at Good Samaritan. (Id. at ¶ 16.) Decedent suffered the development and/or worsening of pressure sores while at Good Samaritan. ...

Excerpt: ... Company (“LBMC”), borrow ing $125,000. (FAC, ¶9.) Plaintiffs executed a promissory note (“Note”) secured by a deed of trust (“DO”) against the Subject Property, Plaintiffs' primary residence. (FAC, ¶¶10 – 11.) The Note and DOT incorrectly identified the parcel number for the Subje ct Property as 599-44 -020. (FAC, ¶¶12 – 13.) LBMC subsequently assigned the [DOT] to Mortgage Electronic Registration Services (“MERS”) on o...

Excerpt: ...024. The primary ba sis for the District's demurrer was the claim that Assembly Bill 218 (“AB 218”), which amended the limitations period for bringing a childhood sexual assault claim under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1, was unconstitutional under Article XVI, § 6 of the California Constitution, also known as the “Gift Clause.” The court ultimately rejected this claim and overruled the demurrer. (See January 23, 2024 Order.)3 Two...

Excerpt: ...that she and simila rly-situated dancers were employed by Defendants AJ's LLC and its owner, Paul Gill, from approximately May 1, 2013, until April 22, 2017, but were misclassified as independent contractors. AJ's Restaurant & Bar (“AJ's”) was a fictitious name for a sole pro prietorship owned by Andrea Russo until he passed away in May 2021. The restaurant closed in 2020 during the Covid pandemic and never reopened, as admitted by Plaintif...

Excerpt: ...rty located at 1343 San Juan Avenue in San Jose, California (“Property”) upon the death of his mother, Maria Castaneda (“Castaneda”). (Complaint at BC -4.) Upon Salvador's death or sale of the Property, Plaintiff was to be provided with her share a s issue of Castaneda.1 (Ibid.) On November 26, 2022, Salvador died and Plaintiff discovered that he transferred the Property into his trust to be given to Defendant, his wife, upon his death. (...

Excerpt: ... attached to Dec. of Fineman. Defendant is correct that Plaintiff was not a party to the contract, and therefore lacks standing to bring suit. California law provides that “[e]very action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest[.]” Code Civ. Proc. § 36 7. A real party in interest is generally defined as “the person possessing the right sued upon by reason of the substantive law.” Redevelopment Agency of San Diego v....

Excerpt: ...y are in the legal cu stody of defendant County. (Id.) Defendant County was responsible for the care and safety of children within Santa Clara County. (Id.) Defendant County provided child welfare, child protective, and childcare services to foster children in Santa Clara Count y, including plaintiff Michael Holys (“Holys”). (SAC, ¶9.) At all relevant times, plaintiff Holys was in foster care under the custody, care, and control of defendant...

Excerpt: ...is Plaintiff s' motion for final approval of settlement, which is unopposed. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs began employment with Defendant in September 2019 and ended their employment in April 2022. (First Amended Class Act ion Complaint (“FAC”), ¶ 3.) Both Plaintiffs were employed by Defendant as hourly, non- exempt employees. (Ibid.) According to Plaintiffs, they were sometimes required to work ...

Excerpt: ...below, Plaintiff' s motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND According to the allegations of the operative Complaint (“Complaint”), Ms. Velasco was employed by Bright Matters, which provides cleaning and janitorial services throughout the state of California, as a janitor from appr oximately September 2021 until her termination in January 2022. Ms. Velasco alleges that she and other aggrieved employees were willfully misclassified as independent con...

Excerpt: ...mon areas on the subdi vision map of Tract No. 10108, file no. 21798266 in San Jose (“Project”). (See TAC, ¶¶ 2, 14.) However, as a result of Defendant's omissions and actions, there were numerous latent defects at the Project, including: missing head flashings at windows and doors, improperly installed stucco and stucco accessories, improperly installed self- adhered membrane and building paper, improperly installed lath, improperly inst...

Excerpt: ...ENIED IN PART. Fi rst, Steinberg Hart seeks further responses to Requests for Production Nos. 24, 25, and 26 from its second set of document requests, under section 2031.310. Z&L's responses consisted solely of objections, without any statement of compliance. But Z&L argu es in its opposition that these requests are duplicative of Requests for Production Nos. 4, 5, and 6, which were presumably contained in Steinberg Hart's first set of document ...

Excerpt: ...n Hsu and Chin- Wei Hsu in Case No. 23CV427626 filed a similar notice in their case referencing this Case No. 22CV407623, the same day. In both notices, the second box in Section 1(h) is checked indicating that each case “arise from the same or substantially identical transact ions, incidents, or events requiring determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.” The plaintiffs in both actions are represented by ...

Excerpt: ...y associated premiums, and failed to provide code- complaint wage statements, among other Labor Code violations. Now before the Court are Plaintiffs' motion for final approval of a settlement and motion for attorneys' fees, costs and enhancement awards, which are unopp osed. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motions. I. BACKGROUND On January 24, 2022, Ms. Martinez and Ms. Orellano filed a PAGA Complaint against Defendant in this Court in...

Excerpt: ...n September 29, 2021, Pl aintiff designs, manufactures, and sells electric cars, electric vehicle powertrain components, as well as scalable energy generation and storage products. (FAC, ¶ 36.) Plaintiff sells successful electric vehicles and is poised to enter the pickup truck market, with over 500,000 reservations for its highly anticipated Cybertruck. (Ibid.) Defendants Rivian Automotive, Inc. and Rivian Automotive, LLC (collectively, “Rivi...

Excerpt: ...) Arvind Srin ivasan v. ZL Technologies, Inc., et al. (Case No. 20CV373027); (3) Arvind Srinivasan v. ZL Technologies, Inc. (Case No. 20CV373149); (4) ZL Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Arvind Srinivasan (Case No. 21CV378097); (5) Arvind Srinivasan v. ZL Technologies, Inc . (Case No. 21CV382329). and As is relevant here, ZL Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Arvind Srinivasan (Case No. 21CV378097) (“Defamation Case”) is a defamation action filed by...

Excerpt: ...t, but from the breach of the separate Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Agreement (“Noncompetition Agreement”) between the parties. Plaintiff argues that because the Noncompetition Agreement does not contain an arbitration clause, it cannot be compelled to arbitration. Defendant responds that the Employment Agreement and Noncompetition Agreement should be read as one, citing both Civ. Code § 1642 and Fillpoint, LLC v. Maas (2012) 208 Cal.A...

Excerpt: ...(“San Jose City”) (collectiv e l y, “City Defendants,”), and the County of Santa Clara (“Santa Clara County”) (collectively, “Defendants.”) Plaintiffs Valdez and Garrett were employed by Kiewit6 Infrastructure West Corporation (“Kiewit Corporation”) as Journeyman Pipe Fitters, working a t San Jose-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility (“Wastewater Facility.”) (FAC, ¶ 19.) The Wastewater Facility is jointly owned and op...

Excerpt: ...k to amend the c omplaint to add two new causes of action against defendants Suzanne Ramirez (Jonathan Ramirez's ex -fiancee) and RRT Group, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”): for financial elder abuse and for an accounting. Defendants respond that they “will not oppose” t his motion “with the following conditions”: (1) that Defendants not be required to file a response to the amended complaint; (2) that they be allowed to conduct ...

Excerpt: ...a fraudulent sc heme to retire senior water rights vis- à-vis duplicitous water claims….for the construction and massive expansion of a luxurious private urban development” in Salt Lake City, Utah. (Complaint ¶ 2.) On September 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed suit under the Fed eral Claims Act in the Federal Court for the District of Utah relating to a public drinking water system in Salt Lake County operated by the Emigration Canyon Improvement...

Excerpt: ...y generic and dev oid of specific explanations regarding the disputed requests. Indeed, the brief does not include or discuss the specific text of any of the 37 the requests at issue, instead grouping them into broad categories and then making general arguments about them. In addition, the brief contains no definition of the “transmission defect” and “engine defect” at issue, leaving it for the reply brief to define these terms. Even ...

Excerpt: ...her responses to requests for production of documents, and (5) to compel compliance with requests for production of documents. In addition, Plaintiffs seek $7,429.00 in monetary sanctions against Surgicare. Because Plaintiffs' motion fails to demonstrate good cause for further responses to the document requests, and because the moving papers barely address the substance of the answers to the interrogatories, the court DENIES the motion in large p...

Excerpt: ... now seek an o rder compelling GM to produce documents relating to (1) the SUBJECT Vehicle (RFP Nos. 1, 2, 3, 9, 14); (2) communications between Plaintiff and Defendant or those associated with Defendant (RFP Nos. 15 and 16); (3) documents relating to the call center, lo yalty program, after warrant assistance program, or technical hotline (RFP Nos. 31 -33); and (4) documents evidencing complaints made by California owners of the same make, model...

Excerpt: ... agent to serve. Plai ntiff has been unable to serve EMC. Defendant is a citizen of Canada and was a board director and significant shareholder of EMC. After another investigation, Plaintiff found a residential address for Defendant. In October 2023, Plaintiff engaged a Canadi an process server to conduct personal service on Defendant, but this was unsuccessful. In November or December 2023, Plaintiff retained a new process server who was able t...

Excerpt: ..., 2022, and the y filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) on October 16, 2023. The FAC alleges in part that of the $623,300.00 currently owed to Plaintiffs: . . . $552,300 represents money Plaintiffs loaned to Defendant to assist in the purchase of two pieces of residential real property —one in the City of San Jose and one in the City of Palo Alto, as well as a small of amount of interest on one of those loans. Constituting t...