Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2800 Results

Location: San Francisco x
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 240))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 25
Array
(
)
2024.03.29 Motion to Compel Further Responses 656
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ... Docs Set 4 This motion is denied on procedural and substantive grounds. The first ground for denying this motion is that it is untimely as it was filed three (3) days after the date provided in the order shortening time allowing the filing of t he motion on shortened notice and the motion does not comply with the order shortening time. The second ground for denying this motion is that the separate statement submitted in support of the motion ...
2024.03.29 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication, to File Under Seal 728
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29
Excerpt: ...dgment is denied. Defendant San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency's ("SFMTA") motion for summary judgment is granted. CCSF's motion for summary adjudication on the general negligence and other ancillary negligence causes of actio n is granted. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) Friday's Law & Motion Calendar will be called out of Dept. 301. Anyone intending to appear in person ...
2024.03.27 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 793
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...r received the summons and complaint," so the default and default judgment are void. (Memo. 2:18; Not. 1:26 -2:1.) It is undisputed that defendant lived at, and ran his d/b/a construction business out of, 1201 32nd Avenue, San Fra ncisco, so substitute service could be accomplished there. (CCP 415.20.) A registered process server declares under penalty of perjury that she tried to serve defendant at the address over the course of three days, ...
2024.03.26 Motion to Obtain Cellular Phone Records, to Enforce Deposition Subpoena 392
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ...llular Phone Records From Metropcs By T -Mobile Or Alternatively, To Enforce Dep osition Subpoena (tentative ruling part 1 of 2) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro T...
2024.03.26 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 593
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ..., a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same au...
2024.03.26 Motion to Compel Further Responses 331
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ...eets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion m ay be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a par...
2024.03.26 Motion to Compel Deposition, for Protective Order, for Sanctions 965
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ...tive Order Re: Deposition Of Pla intiff Melanie Garcia; And Request For Sanctions (tentative ruling part 1 of 3) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all...
2024.03.26 Motion for Relief from Waiver 041
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ...LING PART 1 OF 3) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agree ing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem...
2024.03.26 Motion for Preference in Trial Setting, Extending Discovery Cutoff 180
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ... filed. 1. The trial date is July 15, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 23, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 9, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C...
2024.03.26 Motion for Preference in Trial Setting 164
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ... of the recipients served but rather refers the Court to "SEE TRANSACTION RECEIPT ON FILE & SERVEXPRESS WEBSITE." Even if a proper POS was on file, the motion would be denied on the merits . Plaintiff failed to provide clear and convincing medical documentation demonstrating that Plaintiff suffers from an illness or condition raising substantial medical doubt of survival beyond six months. (C.C.P. Section 36(d).) Counsel refers to the De...
2024.03.22 Motion for Protective Order, for Sanctions 965
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...ive Order Re: Deposition Of Plai ntiff Melanie Garcia; And Request For Sanctions (tentative ruling part 1 of 3) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear th is motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all...
2024.03.22 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 006
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the mo tion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a pa...
2024.03.22 Motion to Strike or Exclude Late Disclosed Non-Retained Expert Testimony 130
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...te Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing th at the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Jud...
2024.03.22 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted, for Monetary Sanctions 139
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ... And To Deem Documents Genuine Under C.C.P. 2033. 280(B) And For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Ricardo Dias Under C.C.P. 2023.030(A) And 2033.280(C) (tentative ruling part 1 of 2) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stip...
2024.03.22 Petition to Enforce Intestigative Subpoena 484
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ...tember 28, 2023, a laborer was killed in a trench collapse. The construction company does not deny that agents of the construction company, Filiberto Poblano, John D'Arcy and John W. Tobin, wer e supervising site safety, managing the work and/or present on the day of the trench collapse. Pursuant to its authority under the Government and Labor Codes, the petitioner pursues an investigation to determine whether there were any violations of law...
2024.03.22 Request for Monetary Sanctions 932
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22
Excerpt: ... 1 of 2) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a s tipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will...
2024.03.21 Motion for Summary Judgment 858
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ...edical malpractice defendant files an expert declaration that its conduct met the standard of care, it is entitled to summary judgment unless plaintiff addu ces conflicting expert evidence. (Munro v. Regents of University of California (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 977, 985.) Pro per plaintiff's opposition papers are largely incomprehensible, but could be read to seek a continuance to enable her to adduce an expert de claration. (See CCP 437c(h).) ...
2024.03.21 Demurrer 513
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21
Excerpt: ... at a vacation rental home booked through Airbnb. The 22- months'-pregnant wife slipped and fell on steep stairs in dangerous condition. Born prematurely as a result, plaintiff baby suffered l oss of all toes on her right foot and other injuries. (FAC 1:27- 2:18.) Airbnb advises its property owners to "ensure stairs are safe and have railings" and inspects for safety before listing a property on its website. (Id. at 3:10 -14.) The FAC...
2024.03.20 Motion for Attorney Fees 218
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...ceivables. That contract provided for assignment to plaintiff of security interests in the receivables and had a prevailing -party attorney fee provision. (Civ. Code 1717.) In turn, Galca had an oral contract for temporary staffing services with TPI (SAC at 4:27 -5:3), generating receivables assigned to plaintiff. Galca was suspended as an LLC in 2017. (Memo. 3:24 - 4:3.) Plaintiff sued, alleging TPI did not pay receivables as required, but TPI p...
2024.03.20 Demurrer 798
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...:2.) By the CLRA's plain language - which must be "liberally construed" - education is a service and plaintiff was a consumer of said service offered by defendant. (Civ. Code 1760 -61.) De fendant cites no contrary court case. The SAC adequately pleads an Unruh Act claim on theories that defendant discriminated against him as white, male and from a conservative Christian background. (Id. at 14:6 -15:8.) Christian beliefs are readily i...
2024.03.20 Demurrer 107
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20
Excerpt: ...omplete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) Per CCP 452, plaintiff's alter ego allegations are sufficient. The court rejects defendant's misjoinder argument and overrules the demurrers to the conversion and br each of contract causes of action. The demurrer to the breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing cause of action is sustained with 20 days leave to amend. The demurrer to the "Unjust Enrichment/Restitu...
2024.03.19 Motion to Dismiss Based on Forum Non Conveniens or to Stay 992
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ... interests of comity and judicial economy. (CCP 128(a)(8).) A putative class action that raises claims similar to this action is presently pending in Delaware. (Cornet, et al. v. Twitter, Inc., Case No. 1:23 -cv -00441 -JLH (D. Del.).) "It is black letter law that, when a federal action has been filed covering the same subject matter as is involved in a California action, the California court has the discretion but not the obligation to stay...
2024.03.19 Motion to Compel Deposition, for Monetary Sanctions 034
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...and parties are required to appear re motely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link (DISCOVERY, DEPARTMENT 302 DAILY AT 9:00 A.M.), or dial the corresponding number and use the meeting ID, and password for Department 302. Any party who contest...
2024.03.19 Motion for Trial Preference 173
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 16, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local R ules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 2, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C.P., unless the parties stipulate otherwise...
2024.03.19 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 567
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ... tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be c onducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding pho...

2800 Results

Per page

Pages